Mafiascum.net

In post 3020, Almost50 wrote: Then THAT is our lynch of the day!

VOTE: Havingfitz

No. No it isn't. I know what Fitz is and he's 100% town. I'll let him decide if I out his role to prove my own, but his role is impossible to be 3rd party/mafia.

VOTE: James

However, James as proven himself to be false. We could've lynched him D1 or D2 with his obvious fake claim. Now with his fake results, we're lynching his ass D3.

I need someone to summarize all claimed roles and claimed actions
or I can try and get to it later
this seems solvable for at least one scum today

In post 3026, TTTT wrote:I need someone to summarize all claimed roles and claimed actions
or I can try and get to it later
this seems solvable for at least one scum today

James 1-shot cop checked Comm and claim guilty
Comm non consec rolecop checked Fitz
I claimed Jailkeeper and jailed Fitz

[Blue = TR, Green = Town]

PeregrineV, RadiantCowbells,
, XnadrojX, SlySly

, TTTT, Vifam, Elena Fisher, TheFuzzylogic99, Ramcius,, Nero Cain, Tywin Lannister

Almost 50/Zekromaster was voting James. I doubt a scum slot would be sitting on scum during the last voting of the day when a town was being mislynched.

Other than that, might as well go for a confirmed mafia today. Unless someone else got someone higher in the food chain.

Also Ramcius, since you claimed Jailkeeper, Fitz can either prove or disprove you right now when he gets here. Which means, we could have 3 living confirmed towns and 1 living confirmed mafia.

In post 3027, Ramcius wrote:

In post 3026, TTTT wrote:I need someone to summarize all claimed roles and claimed actions
or I can try and get to it later
this seems solvable for at least one scum today

James 1-shot cop checked Comm and claim guilty
Comm non consec rolecop checked Fitz
I claimed Jailkeeper and jailed Fitz

FuzzyLogic claimed VT
I do believe Vifam claimed VT

In post 3029, CommKnight wrote:Also Ramcius, since you claimed Jailkeeper, Fitz can either prove or disprove you right now when he gets here. Which means, we could have 3 living confirmed towns and 1 living confirmed mafia.

he could, then he gets rope tomorrow with you on D5 after i flip JK today, i'm totally fine trade 1 for 2 scums

Welcome Almost50. You replaced into an inactive scum slot so we're glad to have you. But you need to cool your jets....especially with as flawed as your content is.

In your opening remarks you immediately push for a Vifam lynch despite not having read any of the game. That's a crock of shit. Then you insert your nose in Tywin's posterior. kisskisskiss...More bs.

As for RC...replacing out...replacing out is not AI. And while you might think this is his town game...I have 4 or 5 games with RC and this did not feel like his town game to me. And in fact...I have seen pissed/frustrated RC replace out as scum (Cheetory6 Mini 1708).

Then...you basically tap dance around James' guilty on Comm ("Now I'm NOT accusing James of being scum" coughcoughbullshit) and basically a 1v1 between he and Comm...for a vote on Vifam. And as mentioned...you haven't even read the game yet. But Vifam is a popular wagon so he muuuust be scum.

Then for some reason you are keen on defending Comm (2991)....as well as the RC slot....

Then you leave your vote on Vifam and proceed to debate with James...of the 1v1 with Comm. 2999

Then you kiss Nero's ass...wtf? 3011 On top of all the posthumous RC smooching.

Then your enthusiasm to lynch me based on Ramicus' result. ???

So you are ok ignoring a guilty claim by James...but you are quick to support a JK claim that does not even confirm alignment. Even if Ram is telling the truth (which he may very well be doing) there is no reason to assign alignment on his JK target. I.e. me. I am town btw.

So I'm on board with a Comm lynch. If he's town, we have scum caught in James.

Then we can move on to you (Almost50) and or Yume assuming the stench of RC's slot hasn't left the game by then.

VOTE: Comm

Also...what were your results Comm?

P.edit...where does Comm claim anything wrt me?

In post 3025, CommKnight wrote:No. No it isn't. I know what Fitz is and he's 100% town. I'll let him decide if I out his role to prove my own, but his role is impossible to be 3rd party/mafia.

I'm VT.

now game getting real

nvm

In post 3035, Vifam wrote:nvm

you staying?

Yeah fuck it

!!!!!!
So, out of ALL players, Comm checked fitz, Ram jailed fitz, and Mafia shot at fitz??? Is that what you're trying to tell me?? Well, it does NOt compute at this end like AT ALL.

First of, what ARE the chances of almost EVERYONE targeting the same player?

Second, Comm checking him means he was "not sure" about him. Ram jailing him means either he was sure fitz was a POWERFUL Town role (thus protecting him) or suspected him for Scum (thus tried to prevent him from taking action). No why would the Mafia try to shoot a player with this status? And WHY OVER TWO CLAIMED COPS? I even think PV claimed investigative, but I think he was joking.

If we only consider their "authority" in the game (so to speak), then why over Nero for instance? It doesn't make sense AT ALL. Can somebody explain it to me?

P-edit:



Regardless of anything else, I find it amusing for you to back a Comm lynch when he just claimed you were Town-all-Town based on your role!! I didn't see that one coming!

P-edit2:

@Ram:

More amusement for you, mate. Comm says a "Vanilla Role" cannot be Scum, meaning there can't be there Mafia Goons.

OK, I'm stepping back 2 steps to take a look at he bigger picture (can't stop laughing though). There seems to be some confusion between he Mafia itself.

So, either fitz is telling the truth, thus Comm is auto-lynched today for his result alone )no to mention the guilty on him from James), or Comm is telling he truth, thus we have TWO guilties in James and fitz (and a VI in Comm who thought whatever fitz' role is cannot be Scum). Either James is telling the truth, thus Comm is one bad Mafioso who has been feeding us shit all the way, or James is Scum and Comm is Town = fitz is lying Scum and Comm is still VI).

Now the BIG JOKE would be if fitz AND Comm are Scum together and fitz didn't check the Scum PT nor did he read Comm's post about him either. It amazes that he pretends to have read everything and didn't even comment on Comm's result on him.

Work it out between you guys. I'm going to watch you try wriggle this one.

@Vifam:

THANK YOU for keeping my faith in you.

I think Comm is telling the truth but honestly everyone is playing so fucking weird this game

Btw, we need to lynch between James and fitz for starters to decide on the next lynch. fitz claims a VT and James claims to have already used his one shot so is effectively a VT for the rest of the game. (Actually I should say Vanilla for both because we don't know yet if they're Town).

Out of the four; Ramcius is the one I'm NOT lynching today no matter what. We need to solve this dilemma/fiasco.

P.S. Now wouldn't it be even funnier if we got one more claim by someone else?? That's be HILARIOUS.

Like both cop claims are just doing everything they're not supposed to do it's amazing

Guys, what your thoughts about Fitz busing buddy? Or scum!Fitz try get lynch on town Comm today just to trade 1 for 1? I just can't think good explanation otherwise for what happening, town!Comm have no reason to lie about Fitz role, and scum!Comm have no reason to save VT, Comm getting vanilla result is impossible, VT couldn't disprove my claim to jail them as Comm stated Fitz could do

P-edit: A50, Comm already burned bridge of vanilla result, he said Fitz can disprove my jailing him claim, and Fitz simply can bus buddy, claiming to check Fitz over his SRs, heck, he was calling me scum PR for SRing, yet he check Fitz from all the people?

In post 3042, Vifam wrote:I think Comm is telling the truth but honestly everyone is playing so fucking weird this game

If Comm is telling the truth then either fitz is lying or Comm is the worst player ever!!

In post 3044, Vifam wrote:Like both cop claims are just doing everything they're not supposed to do it's amazing

James claimed prematurely and unnecessarily, granted. But he did check the one target he should have.

Comm also claimed prematurely and unnecessarily, but also his check on fitz is astonishingly odd.

@Comm:

Do you have extensive experience with fitz from before? I mean, can you explain why you picked HIM to check over everybody else?

Actually the same question can be directed at Ram: Why did you jail fitz in particular?

@Ram:

Yes, I saw that and it's still making me laugh. I'm for lynching fitz still for starters, unless someone shows me a better option.

fitz flipping red = Comm red = James green

fitz flipping green = Comm is BAD TOWN = James is Scum

In post 3046, Almost50 wrote:
Actually the same question can be directed at Ram: Why did you jail fitz in particular?

i was thinking which one from my SRs (yes, i have like half people in game as SRs ) could submit NK, basically was picking between TTTT and Fitz, i was looking someone who isn't complete lurker, but neither being under scrutiny D1, in other words for someone, who wouldn't be roleblock target normally

Cool. So you had a SCUM READ on fitz already (doesn't surprise me as I had him as a scum lean myself).

Now tell me, how likely -in your own opinion- for a Role Cop to have also checked him? Also, let assume -for the sake of argument- that fitz is actually Town; so how likely he would be the NK target as well?

Moreover, how can you explain Comm saying fitz has a role that can prove you Jk'd him while fitz claiming to be a mere VT?

Finally, could you please put the three names in question in order from best lynch to worst? The three of course are Comm, fitz & James (you won't be naming yourself, and I have you as the one I won't lynch of the four anyway)