Mafiascum.net

high*

In post 3022, nomnomnom wrote:this is how you're act?

"when vork does it, it's hot air, BS, he's being annoying, *insert reason here*"
"when , it's solving, much wow, such LAMIST, gamesolvey"

ofc- I'm slightly butthurt

In post 3023, nomnomnom wrote:you all I

In post 3026, Vorkuta wrote:

In post 3022, nomnomnom wrote:this is how you're act?

"when vork does it, it's hot air, BS, he's being annoying, *insert reason here*"
"when

literally anyone else does it

, it's solving, much wow, such LAMIST, gamesolvey"

ofc- I'm slightly butthurt

It's not consistent with how you approached this day 1 dude.
How the fuck is this not relevant in your world?? hello???

In post 3024, pisskop wrote:Vorki, this is a pertinent question.

I think it's complete BS that I'm told to shut up and hold my concerns for most of the game
and finally, when I'm starting to compromise (mostly one-way so far) and see eye-to-eye with some people, this shit gets struck up AGAIN

ugh its not struck up again.

In post 3029, Vorkuta wrote:

In post 3024, pisskop wrote:Vorki, this is a pertinent question.

I think it's complete BS that I'm told to shut up and hold my concerns for most of the game
and finally, when I'm starting to compromise (mostly one-way so far) and see eye-to-eye with some people, this shit gets struck up AGAIN

Because you brought it up and I want to understand.

Nobody told you to shut up, you're not being consistent and honestly you're causing me a headache by how obtuse you're acting. How is the slot you were doubting announcing they actually may not be miller not relevant to the gamestate?

In post 61, Vorkuta wrote:-If the setup guys were drunk they could make him "Odd-Night" Miller (investig shows him as cop during even nights, and scum during oddnights)

this is just spec, but no I dont think you can make it an active ability, and if you did it would almost always be compulsive.

In post 74, Nero Cain wrote:b/c Nom didn't understand why ppl were saying the miller was a modifier. Why should I not have clarified that for him? I am not sure why it shows you as quoting Cinns words. I prob quoted something wrong but is that even important?

- I have an excuse I cite first
- It was an accident.


:IGMEOU:

In post 75, Detective Pikachu wrote:With my expert detective work I have determined that nero and teacher are not s/s

Cinnamon (3):

Vorkuta, Flubbernugget, Nero Cain

teacher (1):

u r a person 2

u r a person 2 (1):

teacher

skitter30 (1):

Detective Pikachu

EvilDeanius (1):

nomnomnom

No Lynch (1):

Cinnamon

Not Voting (5):

NerfedBuJ, skitter30, Saladman27, Dunnstral, EvilDeanius

With

13

alive, it takes

7

to hammer.
Day 1 ends in

(expired on 2019-06-22 09:30:00)

omg ohrfz Your floating VC is fan-freakin-tastic!

In post 3030, pisskop wrote:ugh its not struck up again.

In post 3016, skitter30 wrote:HURT: pk

oh ok then

In post 3031, nomnomnom wrote:How is the slot you were doubting announcing they actually may not be miller not relevant to the gamestate?

*inhales*
do you really need to be spoonfed here?

I'm always willing to buy that town obfuscates/hides information as I think its the optimal thing to do.
I DID NOT like bunny's approach to everything related to that claim, but all of you are like "no vork stfu scum"
NOW THAT his slot is doing things that I like, approve of, and view as more optimal- you're all like "hurt tags" and shit

So like you were fine with half-assing this slot when I was in charge
but *hand-wavey* "things changed" and now you 180.

I think vork is scum. Im at 89 and all Ive read is whats been posted since I placed and those 89 posts.

In post 3035, Vorkuta wrote:NOW THAT his slot is doing things that I like, approve of, and view as more optimal- you're all like "hurt tags" and shit

...What stuff exactly have you liked from pisskop?

Vork, when you are scum you tend to joke around more and make up bad reasons for pushing people. You also fall back onto making several one liners in posts: and none of them are ever very useful

In post 98, Detective Pikachu wrote:

Spoiler:

I dont suppose youre an openly out alt?

You do have a certain 'feel'

@pisskop
oh man
#89
back in the day

@nom x3
-he's coming to the game with a fresh take on things regarding the urap2 wagon.
I disapprove of his attempt to derail it, but I approve of something FRESH brought in
-he's doing things with his role PM that I view to be pro-town and more optimal than bunny's.... buniness.
of course it COULD just be damage control, but I don't think so
-he scum reads you and it's about time someone took me seriously on it

In post 3040, Vorkuta wrote:-he scum reads you and it's about time someone took me seriously on it

That's an omgus vote considering he has not read the game at all. That's honestly a terrible reason to like his entrance.

Bad reasons?


Bad reasons aye

In post 3038, pisskop wrote:you tend to joke around more

false- I've just rolled scum a few times and this coincides with me getting more and more comfortable with site/meta/people/blah

In post 3038, pisskop wrote:ou also fall back onto making several one liners in posts

In post 3038, pisskop wrote:none of them are ever very useful

shit I've already used that one

But as town, every push I make is golden, and every post I make is useful and serious?
Also kindly keep reading

Nom is still scummy imo

In post 101, Cinnamon wrote:I felt like I shouldn't be playing it like a regular miller but I wasn't sure so I felt like coming out as a miller was a weaker, albeit safer play.

this kid just doesnt stop.


Yes I have miller as part of my role.

In post 3045, pisskop wrote:

In post 101, Cinnamon wrote:I felt like I shouldn't be playing it like a regular miller but I wasn't sure so I felt like coming out as a miller was a weaker, albeit safer play.

this kid just doesnt stop.


Yes I have miller as part of my role.

UNVOTE:

In post 3041, nomnomnom wrote:

In post 3040, Vorkuta wrote:-he scum reads you and it's about time someone took me seriously on it

That's an omgus vote considering he has not read the game at all. That's honestly a terrible reason to like his entrance.

is your vote on nom a non-serious and terrible OMGUS vote?

But he should really have not mentioned the 'i have more' stychk. I have no clue if he tried crumbing or mentioning targets or w.e. but he would have done so much better to just sit there and not be nked, Just like every other miller ever.

In post 3047, Vorkuta wrote:is your vote on nom a non-serious and terrible OMGUS vote?

Mostly trolling, but I mean we'll see just how scummy they get.