Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2020 9:04 pm
like if pooky is a town vig who is a vig shooting n2 is a throw
Yeah, that might be a great idea. We can no execute and leash him to shoot whomever the majority wants because having both an execution plus a vig would only help scum.In post 3024, the worst wrote:Trying to decide if I would value noelim and having Pooky shoot (/me die???) more than I would value an elim atp
If we’re wrong on it being exactly djstr/Pooky.In post 3035, Raven Branwen wrote:Yeah, that might be a great idea. We can no execute and leash him to shoot whomever the majority wants because having both an execution plus a vig would only help scum.In post 3024, the worst wrote:Trying to decide if I would value noelim and having Pooky shoot (/me die???) more than I would value an elim atp
@SS what do you think of this idea?
I don't want Pooky to shoot me. I want to be a be the scum nk!In post 3036, Raven Branwen wrote:@duckling, why would you want Pooky to shoot you though, that part I’m not getting?
pooky: i don't know if i'm a blank or notIn post 3027, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:honestly I think the only value my role can play now is that if you guys accept me as town - scum will have to use a NK on me as I will draw vs scum in a 1v1 endgame but that would require you guys to actually believe me.
there's been at least one (micro 909)In post 3026, the worst wrote:does anyone know off hand if there's been a strongman in a micro in the last year?
Well. that’s why I proposed a leash, if he shoots anyone else. it would be a scumclaim basically. It depends on how confident we our on who is most likely to be scum but I think Pooky’s role could possibly be confirmable. Because I tl him slightly after ISOing him in coalition, I would prefer to confirm him if possible.In post 3031, the worst wrote:The problem is that to accept that plan, we also have to carte blanche accept you as town who will be the final person standing and I'm not sure how I feel about that.
Oh sorry, I misread. D’ohIn post 3039, the worst wrote:I don't want Pooky to shoot me. I want to be a be the scum nk!In post 3036, Raven Branwen wrote:@duckling, why would you want Pooky to shoot you though, that part I’m not getting?
In post 3027, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:honestly I think the only value my role can play now is that if you guys accept me as town - scum will have to use a NK on me as I will draw vs scum in a 1v1 endgame but that would require you guys to actually believe me.
But you’re not sure you’re not a blank vig, is this correct?In post 3028, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:if you all accept that I have to be town - scum have to NK me because they can't let me get to 3p lylo because even if we miss there, I would shoot the last scum in the endgame
I’m not familiar with that game but why even have a blank vig in a setup? I’ve heard of modified bgs before but never a blank vig.In post 2985, Something_Smart wrote:enomis was a blank vig. I'd be surprised if Micc didn't clarify that Pooky was a blank vig, because they certainly are.
In post 3041, Datisi wrote:there's been at least one (micro 909)In post 3026, the worst wrote:does anyone know off hand if there's been a strongman in a micro in the last year?
Welcome, [Playername]. You are a Mafia 1-Shot Strongman.
You are a member of the Mafia, along with X, who is a Mafia Goon. You and your partner share a factional kill each night. You must choose which of you will commit the kill. You also share a factional PT, located here, where you may talk at any time.
Once per game you may strongkill a player, overriding any protection they might have.
You win when the Town has been eliminated, or nothing can stop this from occurring.
The game thread is here. Please confirm by replying to this PM with your role name or by posting in your PT.
In post 3046, Datisi wrote:i played in that game, it's a role madness chaos game where there's 3-5 viginaltes, and each has a 50% chance of being a blank viginalte. of course, the vigis themselves are not aware whether they're a blank or not.
Yeah, there’s obviously some swing in this: you don’t have a lover, tw doesn’t have a neighbour etc. But I see your point, it’s possible he could be bluffing but then why not just say he vigged N1 but it failed? Why claim he just didn’t try? That’s the part that I’m not getting.In post 3047, Datisi wrote:vigilante*, i can't spell. also the person he's claiming to be was a blank in that game, but the role PM doesn't say that.