Mafiascum.net

In post 3016, Tayl0r Swift wrote:

In post 2998, schadd_ wrote:

In post 2944, MathBlade wrote:

@schadd: Do you publically answer questions? If so if a Miller was publically copped however that happened would any modifiers such as miller or godfather come into effect? Or is this the “mod ordained” truth?

if there were the possibility of that kind of result tampering i would indicate as such. for instance, the information regarding norwegianboyee at the start of today is indeed true

doesnt this imply that the cop is miller-proof or that there are no millers in the game? or am i missing something?

I am not sure. I think we need more information but likely miller claim was a lie but people fake claim day one as “jokes” a lot. I think the information we need the answer this outweighs the scum hunting going on. Now if someone claims the public cop (don’t please today we’ve had enough claims) or it flips then hunt there. But right now we have two “claims against people” that need to be sorted.

In post 3020, Morning Mage wrote:

In post 3016, Tayl0r Swift wrote:

In post 2998, schadd_ wrote:

In post 2944, MathBlade wrote:

@schadd: Do you publically answer questions? If so if a Miller was publically copped however that happened would any modifiers such as miller or godfather come into effect? Or is this the “mod ordained” truth?

if there were the possibility of that kind of result tampering i would indicate as such. for instance, the information regarding norwegianboyee at the start of today is indeed true

doesnt this imply that the cop is miller-proof or that there are no millers in the game? or am i missing something?

why have millers and a miller-proof cop? unless there are multiple cops i guess? like alignment and faction variants

well this one is clearly a variant cop. and theres a tracker, so maybe its a very cop-heavy setup.

yeah im not sure where the titus wagon is coming from. i think titus likes scumreading me. i dont think its that AI? definitely need to see those notes before scumbinning.

In post 3023, Morning Mage wrote:I'm very excited right now.

And yes, that is a hard claim.

Are you Bell? How are you hard claiming it is multiball? Or are you just hard claiming town? I don’t want if it’s your role related or what not just want to calibrate my reads.

i think maybe BM was hardclaiming excited there.

I am in a neighborhood with mastina, Nero Cain, and Almost50. Almost50 was neighborized last night by me. He can confirm.

Still not home. I just saw this and needed to give input.

why did the neighborhood start out with 2 people

I'm a little confused, who claimed miller?
I think almost claimed miller mason but i thought that was a joke?

In post 3016, Tayl0r Swift wrote:

In post 2998, schadd_ wrote:

In post 2944, MathBlade wrote:

@schadd: Do you publically answer questions? If so if a Miller was publically copped however that happened would any modifiers such as miller or godfather come into effect? Or is this the “mod ordained” truth?

if there were the possibility of that kind of result tampering i would indicate as such. for instance, the information regarding norwegianboyee at the start of today is indeed true

doesnt this imply that the cop is miller-proof or that there are no millers in the game? or am i missing something?

You're missing:

A) "if there were the possibility of that kind of result tampering"
and
B) "NorwegianboyEE is not a member of King Doris Donatello's Army"

This means:

A) There is NO possibility if this being the case (most likely because the "Cop" that is assigned to find us can only get "Goliath/Not Goliath" kind of result.
and
B) Norwee is only cleared from being on the same faction as Gamma, but not confirmed a townie.

Let me remind you all that it does NOT say that we are "Masons" nor that we are "Millers" in our PT. What it does say is we are all confirmed to be "Town Aligned 3P", so the "Mason Miller" was me rephrasing what I had perceived it to be, but -obviously- we cannot be "Millers" if there's no Cop that returns "Town/Not Town" or "Town/3P/Scum" results.

Got it?

In post 3032, PlusJOYED wrote:why did the neighborhood start out with 2 people

Three. Ask the mod post game, but we neighborize one person per night.

I'm also inclined to believe april is telling the truth here
peddit; you said you neighborized and started with 3. whose the 4th?

A50 check the hood.

Pedit: The hood started with me, Nero, mastina. We added A50.

In post 3037, Titus wrote:A50 check the hood.

Pedit: The hood started with me, Nero, mastina. We added A50.

Titus I find this odd from you. Assuming you’re town rule of three implies one of Mastina/Nero/you is scum.
Why invite a mason claim to a hood with likely scum? That seems odd for you.

Is it a group vote or you decide after asking people?

i don't believe, at the very least, everyone in that hood has a town wincon.

So you’re all 3rd party?

Last time I messed with a neighborhood group claim, things got wrecked

In post 3038, MathBlade wrote:

In post 3037, Titus wrote:A50 check the hood.

Pedit: The hood started with me, Nero, mastina. We added A50.

Titus I find this odd from you. Assuming you’re town rule of three implies one of Mastina/Nero/you is scum.
Why invite a mason claim to a hood with likely scum? That seems odd for you.

Working with a mason is a good thing. Even supposing there's scum in the hood, which there is not, a mason just works with town. We can sort out the Army that way.

In post 3040, PlusJOYED wrote:i don't believe, at the very least, everyone in that hood has a town wincon.

Same

We're actually mod confirmed to each other. See mastina's readwall having me as town before I posted.

In post 3042, Titus wrote:

In post 3038, MathBlade wrote:

In post 3037, Titus wrote:A50 check the hood.

Pedit: The hood started with me, Nero, mastina. We added A50.

Titus I find this odd from you. Assuming you’re town rule of three implies one of Mastina/Nero/you is scum.
Why invite a mason claim to a hood with likely scum? That seems odd for you.

Working with a mason is a good thing. Even supposing there's scum in the hood, which there is not, a mason just works with town. We can sort out the Army that way.

No more so than a largely townread player. The mason can’t out their partner(s) in the hood if valid. Mason claims are very jokey on d1 especially no pressure. So benefit wise seems at best a VT in there and you’ve given scum cards to play in advance. Like I feel like you’re either not all here or scum.

so the additions dont necessarily share your alignment do they? if they did that would be wildly OP.

Last time I saw a neighborhood with “all confirmed to be town” they didn’t all end up being town.

In post 3042, Titus wrote:

In post 3038, MathBlade wrote:

In post 3037, Titus wrote:A50 check the hood.

Pedit: The hood started with me, Nero, mastina. We added A50.

Titus I find this odd from you. Assuming you’re town rule of three implies one of Mastina/Nero/you is scum.
Why invite a mason claim to a hood with likely scum? That seems odd for you.

Working with a mason is a good thing. Even supposing there's scum in the hood,

which there is not,

a mason just works with town. We can sort out the Army that way.

?

Ugh and I thought I felt bad yesterday.

What’s the 3rd party wincon then?