Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2021 11:18 am
My target N2 was DGB so from my PoV it makes sense if Shrek visited DGB to NK them and STD protected DGB and MegA is scum with a fake claim.
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
Because the NK would be me over DGB and that makes DGB look bad because DGB should always die before me.In post 3021, Roden wrote:Oof my part got removed.In post 3001, Roden wrote:In post 2992, LicketyQuickety wrote:Because I think the NK will implicate DGB.In post 2988, Roden wrote:If you think DGB is scum then why do you want to vote Gamma?In post 2982, LicketyQuickety wrote:If DGB is scum why would it purposely implicate itself as scum with the NK?In post 2981, CheekyTeeky wrote:Tbh I want Shrek to be town, but I still think both MegA/Shrek are scum.
I don't. DGB has been Scummy since they brought up their claim. Now they are SURE that Shrek is Scum? Given all the other talk about Rolestopper and RB? It does not sound like DGB is interested in actually sorting Shrek but just wants to Elim them.
If DGB is scum then why would it purposely implicate itself with the NK?
I'm not asking what makes sense to you. I'm asking you about what you know for a fact.In post 3025, CheekyTeeky wrote:My target N2 was DGB so from my PoV it makes sense if Shrek visited DGB to NK them and STD protected DGB and MegA is scum with a fake claim.
In post 2947, LicketyQuickety wrote:Yeah, and DGB is still pushing the "Shrek is Scum" narrative that is really lacking an awareness of what has been said.In post 2944, Dragon of the West wrote:So DGB has a "guilty" in the sense that the person they targeted wasn't added to the PT. But they wouldn't know the difference between that and being blocked
In post 2988, Roden wrote:If you think DGB is scum then why do you want to vote Gamma?In post 2982, LicketyQuickety wrote:I don't. DGB has been Scummy since they brought up their claim. Now they are SURE that Shrek is Scum? Given all the other talk about Rolestopper and RB? It does not sound like DGB is interested in actually sorting Shrek but just wants to Elim them.In post 2981, CheekyTeeky wrote:Tbh I want Shrek to be town, but I still think both MegA/Shrek are scum.
HEYIn post 2991, LicketyQuickety wrote:Uh, no? Because we let NKs solve this. If I die (which is likely) then it paints DGB in a bad light. If Shrek dies, then it paints DGB in a bad light. If DGB dies, then it makes Shrek look bad. If Cheeky dies, it probably does nothing, but dissuades the conversation one more day.In post 2984, CheekyTeeky wrote:If DGB is scum we all owe it to it to nom them after the game.
On another note, I think the reason that DGB took my advice to target Shrek is because of who it clears if Shrek is Scum. I would have honestly expected Town!DGB to question my methods of those clears because they are behind closed doors.
this is the first good lead I've seen you pursue in a long timeIn post 3027, LicketyQuickety wrote:I'm not asking what makes sense to you. I'm asking you about what you know for a fact.In post 3025, CheekyTeeky wrote:My target N2 was DGB so from my PoV it makes sense if Shrek visited DGB to NK them and STD protected DGB and MegA is scum with a fake claim.
I know for a fact that I targeted DGB N2 and got a action failed result.In post 3027, LicketyQuickety wrote:I'm not asking what makes sense to you. I'm asking you about what you know for a fact.In post 3025, CheekyTeeky wrote:My target N2 was DGB so from my PoV it makes sense if Shrek visited DGB to NK them and STD protected DGB and MegA is scum with a fake claim.
In post 2947, LicketyQuickety wrote:Yeah, and DGB is still pushing the "Shrek is Scum" narrative that is really lacking an awareness of what has been said.In post 2944, Dragon of the West wrote:So DGB has a "guilty" in the sense that the person they targeted wasn't added to the PT. But they wouldn't know the difference between that and being blocked
In post 2988, Roden wrote:If you think DGB is scum then why do you want to vote Gamma?In post 2982, LicketyQuickety wrote:I don't. DGB has been Scummy since they brought up their claim. Now they are SURE that Shrek is Scum? Given all the other talk about Rolestopper and RB? It does not sound like DGB is interested in actually sorting Shrek but just wants to Elim them.In post 2981, CheekyTeeky wrote:Tbh I want Shrek to be town, but I still think both MegA/Shrek are scum.
In post 2991, LicketyQuickety wrote:Uh, no? Because we let NKs solve this. If I die (which is likely) then it paints DGB in a bad light. If Shrek dies, then it paints DGB in a bad light. If DGB dies, then it makes Shrek look bad. If Cheeky dies, it probably does nothing, but dissuades the conversation one more day.In post 2984, CheekyTeeky wrote:If DGB is scum we all owe it to it to nom them after the game.
On another note, I think the reason that DGB took my advice to target Shrek is because of who it clears if Shrek is Scum. I would have honestly expected Town!DGB to question my methods of those clears because they are behind closed doors.
In post 2995, Nero Cain wrote:lol guy. DGB like exclusively defended scum and pushed town at least in the early game.In post 2986, Dragon of the West wrote:LQ, town!DGB is just really accusatory in general and pegs people as scum even without hard guilties. I'd say at best it's NAI but I haven't seen their scum play so maybe I'm wrongIn post 2982, LicketyQuickety wrote:I don't. DGB has been Scummy since they brought up their claim. Now they are SURE that Shrek is Scum? Given all the other talk about Rolestopper and RB? It does not sound like DGB is interested in actually sorting Shrek but just wants to Elim them.In post 2981, CheekyTeeky wrote:Tbh I want Shrek to be town, but I still think both MegA/Shrek are scum.
Action failed is RB. No Result is anything else.In post 3029, Dwlee99 wrote:Action failed is different in what way from no result?
Yeah my bad. Poor wordingIn post 3020, Nero Cain wrote:oh i get it. When you said "pegs" you just meant calls. It doesn't have anything to do with accuracy.
No. No result is what's given on a roleblock. Read the normal guidelinesIn post 3034, LicketyQuickety wrote:Action failed is RB. No Result is anything else.In post 3029, Dwlee99 wrote:Action failed is different in what way from no result?
In Normal games, a common example of approved wording for a "no result" PM is "Your action failed, and you did not receive a result."
So what happened to my Shrek target then?In post 2997, Dwlee99 wrote:So we definitely lim in mega/cheeky.
Idk what Cheeky's specific role is but if you roleblock certain investigative roles they get a "no result" pm per the wiki. So action failed = no result of roleblocked unless action failed isn't getting roleblocked? Idk what the scenario would be for action failed?In post 3034, LicketyQuickety wrote:Action failed is RB. No Result is anything else.In post 3029, Dwlee99 wrote:Action failed is different in what way from no result?
Yeah it is a thing, specific to my role which means either I was RB'd or DGB ascetic which I don't think they are due to Shrek/mega claims and STD death.In post 3038, Dwlee99 wrote:"Action failed" just isn't a thing.
Cheeky could have roleblocked you?In post 3041, DrippingGoofball wrote:So what happened to my Shrek target then?In post 2997, Dwlee99 wrote:So we definitely lim in mega/cheeky.
You couldn't have been roleblocked if you were seen visiting DGB. So either mega is lying or cheeky is lying.In post 3044, CheekyTeeky wrote:Yeah it is a thing, specific to my role which means either I was RB'd or DGB ascetic which I don't think they are due to Shrek/mega claims and STD death.In post 3038, Dwlee99 wrote:"Action failed" just isn't a thing.