Mafiascum.net

Thank you. Going to wait for gobble to come in and see what he does.

Luca, I know Tchill's claim is ridiculous. But you seemed to buy into it yourself to some degree (you were seriously considering me/gobble as a team) until you saw that I got Icon's mail. Surely you can see that it isn't immediately obvious that Tchill is lying without some amount of confirmation bias?

Going to be reading back for some time. This is beginning to feel solvable, but as of right now I'm rather torn.

In post 634, Alisae wrote:Kop (3) [L-1] - Almost50, Iconeum, Datisi, Billy Pilgrim
Datisi (3) [L-2] - Tchill13, Emperor flippyNips, Luca Blight
Emperor flippyNips (1) - Kop
Tchill13 (1) - Klick

I think at around this formation is where I want to say that there is 1 scum on each wagon.

Well played Alisae lol

Oh but then you go on to say the Datisi wagon screams 2 scum to you. Hmm. Might be worth checking Tchill/Luca's interactions with the Datisi wagon again anyway just to see if I find anything new and interesting.

In post 3050, Klick wrote:Thank you. Going to wait for gobble to come in and see what he does.

Luca, I know Tchill's claim is ridiculous. But you seemed to buy into it yourself to some degree (you were seriously considering me/gobble as a team) until you saw that I got Icon's mail. Surely you can see that it isn't immediately obvious that Tchill is lying without some amount of confirmation bias?

Going to be reading back for some time. This is beginning to feel solvable, but as of right now I'm rather torn.

I never bought into Tchill’s claim. I wanted him to think I was considering the idea that it could be Klick/Gobble so he would consider voting Gobble to get my trust. I’ve been pretty sure of a Tchill/Gobble scumteam since late D2 when Tchill wanted to Lynch Datisi based on her content with even realizing she had attacked you, thus meaning he hadn’t even read her content. Obviously your letter changed the course of these events.

VOTE: Luca

[REDACTED] I received the message that I tracked Lil uzi Vert to icon.

Yeah I'm done answering any and all questions from Luca or uzi.

Hopefully you're still reading the content I'm providing. I definitely urge you to.

I also think it's odd uzi is yet to vote me if I'm conf scum

I asked Luca to case why gobble/uzi wasn't the team (he didn't).

I've tried to think of every possible angle. My pushes are born of uzi/x team.

Luca voted gobble and wouldn't tell me why gobble/uzi wasn't the team.

And if I didn't know scum couldn't use their PR action and make the kill then am I faking that or do I get town cred similar to Billy not knowing scum didn't have dayc chat?

I'm pushing so much "why would gobble/tchill do x" because it's really all I have for my defense at this point.

Idc if Luca ask credible questions. You've seen what happens when I answer. "it's bullshit" either way. Every.... Answer. So if you want to ask I'll answer. I'm done with Luca though.

In post 3047, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:We’ve seen enough man. As Luca said, all you’re doing is drowning the thread with scum claim after scum claim.

Hops in 2 hours after nobody has made a post to tell me to stop posting.

Dude has provided no scum hunting this day phase. All he's done is call me conf scum (without voting me I might add).

This entire game is hanging on Billy's interaction.

If you went by luv's play alone then there'd be no reason to TR this slot.

Luca clears this slot based on what the replace out did.

Luca condemns the a50/gobble slot based on what the replacement did.

LUV has effectively accomplished nothing since he replaced in. He hasn't scum hunted.... In lylo lol.

I'm over this game. My temperament changed the moment I realized it was luca/uzi. I'm at peace with the game and I've apologized to who I needed to apologize to (I've been a huge asshole) but hopefully you don't start scum reading me because I'm not interacting with Luca or luv anymore. Why would I? They're conf scum.

And I did that, btw. I had to go and case why uzi/gobble wasn't the team. Luca voted gobble but failed to provide why it couldn't be uzi/gobble.

Also think it's hilarious that Luca's claiming he cleared you off an L-2 vote. I never quite understood his logic on that.

In post 551, Billy Pilgrim wrote:I'm having trouble coming around to scum!Icon in this interaction. That said, I feel like this wagon built up pretty quickly. Datisi, if you're town, do you think scum is on or off the wagon?

This isn't great.

I agree, but I’m not sure what the relevance is?

I'm rereading and commenting as I go

In post 1202, Alisae wrote:

In post 1194, Almost50 wrote:

In post 702, Almost50 wrote:And allow me to point out (@Ali) that I think you probably misread 618. I didn't get the feeling he was mad at ou challenging his authority at all. Read it again, if you will.

Well, at least I still got a good eye for crumbs.

o i see it

Part of me feels like Alisae left the crumb because he wanted to use it to read A50 as town if he lived? Especially considering this post came before the crumb.

You never said what time you got your notification of the letter klick. Which would validate my point of how incredibly dangerous it's be for scum to push someone before all ppl post and before scum have an idea of who may have received the letter.

In post 2296, Tchill13 wrote:Icon please vote LUV. For the luv of all that is good... Hehe.

No seriously. We need a flip. Luv is a better lynch than datisi. Idc what gobble's reasons for voting luv is.

This is a good post.

Chemist seems to not want us to talk timestamps? I don't see that as a super strong selling point anyway.

I’m still rereading because I’ve honestly just skimmed it all. A part of me also was hoping and still is that you’d give up and save yourself the embarrassment.

Your inability to put yourself in my shoes is another reason why you’re confirmed scum. I’m a vanilla townie which means I know you’re faking a guilty on me. Considering that you often chastise town for fake claiming and disincentive it in a majority of your games, it’s hard for me to believe you’re somehow town here doing it.

We are pass the point of whether or not you could be town doing it for reactions. You clearly buckled down on your claim despite the mounting evidence that shows you’re lying. What choice am I left with?

You keep referencing my play but the only thing that you can say about it is that I’m inactive. You refuse to read all my content and the few bits of content you have read, you frame it as scummy.

But I got my PMs for the result and for Day 3 starting very, very close to each other, time-wise.

Good deal. Thx.

Is there any reason for luv not to have voted me by now?

The jig is up right luv? You should have voted me the moment I claimed a "fake guilty" on you.

Are you afraid to do so now that Luca's vote on me?

Because you had a chance to vote me before that and didn't.

I'll interact with you if you're gonna play.

You claim I should have reason to push you other than "inactive"

By all means please tell me what you've produced that will help town win this game.

Tell me what distinctions you've come across before others had. What events you controlled or decided.

I have failed to see the game from your perspective.

Luca has failed to see the game from my perspective.

I'm calling for you to vote me in your next post also.

Seeing how ik gobble/klick are town.

If you don't vote me in your next post I'd like a reason. Then I'd like an explanation of said reason.

@luv

What do you make of Luca voting gobble instead of me in lylo? Luca has sr'd me longer than gobble.

What do you think about Luca eating till klick claimed the letter b4 putting his vote on gobble. Definitely a safer play if luca is scum than to come out and vote gobble immediately right?

Nobody answer anything I've sent towards luv. If he wants to provide content then I've given him the opportunity.

In post 1, Chemist1422 wrote:

Rules

• Do not reference timestamps on any moderator messages.

In post 3070, Chemist1422 wrote:

In post 1, Chemist1422 wrote:

Rules

• Do not reference timestamps on any moderator messages.

y’all, please stop referencing timestamps from messages, even indirectly.

Hey man... Like... Luca's this desperate to win as scum here. Which is hilarious. Anyway, sorry.

Somebody called for me to do that and I got scum read harder for not doing that immediately lol.

I did ask klick about this though. I guess we're even. I didn't do it first though.

You were the one who asked Klick when he received his result.

My point was this was a slip - you had momentarily forgotten your Tracker claim. If you really were Tracker you would know when Klick received his result by your own result and wouldn’t have needed to ask.