Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2020 12:29 pm
Because I thought he might be scum? Because he was unlikely to be a TPR? because he was unlikely to be a scum PR so he was more likely to be the one making the kill?
Because I thought he might be scum? Because he was unlikely to be a TPR? because he was unlikely to be a scum PR so he was more likely to be the one making the kill?
In post 3035, lilith2013 wrote:Also mena’s play D3 makes no sense as a cop receiving an innocent result on skitter. I want crumbs.
i'm leaning this way too (believing menalque), which is why a doctor should straight up claim now, as it's a direct counterclaim to menalque.In post 3047, petapan wrote:i think he's probably telling the truth about being blocked regardless because the potential for someone to just counter him would make it incredibly stupid to do as scum
why were you hunting scum when there are still 3 of them and it would just give another ambiguous soft-guilty? instead of the widely accepted correct meta way which is to use it like a doc until scum numbers are down?In post 3050, lilith2013 wrote:Because I thought he might be scum? Because he was unlikely to be a TPR? because he was unlikely to be a scum PR so he was more likely to be the one making the kill?
it would hurt the odds of skitter surviving any further if I didn't act ambiguously on her? I wanted scum to think there was still doubt in my mind about her to try to maybe reduce the odds of her dyingIn post 3055, lilith2013 wrote:you called skitter likely scum and me locktown at one point. that’s not a thing that a cop with an innocent on skitter does.
failing to see how this is relevant?In post 3055, lilith2013 wrote:and me locktown at one point.
A lot of things depends on whether there's a doc in the setup. If there isn't, we have to think about if you made the kill N1 or if you were the NK target. If there is, n_m is directly cc'ing you. A commuter existing and when they used their shot could change things a bunch as well.In post 3049, Menalque wrote:wait, talk me through this? surely it makes more sense to elim within us even if it was me?
there are two blocks claimed last night.In post 3056, Menalque wrote:doctor should not claim because (1) it's not, lili could have JK'd me last night
and (2) if we elim in me/lili/NM there's no reason to out them
because I'd clearly revoked it by the end of the day and I assumed that people would look at my pointed remark at skitter at start of day and sole TR status at the end of day as the most indicative things if I died, vs the various shit I say in the course of the dayIn post 3059, lilith2013 wrote:if you’re a cop and you don’t have an innocent on me then why would you say something that could be taken that way?
this seems? weird? seeing as I think either skitt or I asked you about it when we quizzed you on choosing me as a N1 target?In post 3060, lilith2013 wrote:I don’t (didn’t) know what the “widely accepted meta way” is. I have close to 0 knowledge of what the proper “mechanics” for PR usage is.
what do you mean by this?In post 3066, Infinity 324 wrote:I feel like he's played this day very weirdly.
i don't have anyIn post 3066, Infinity 324 wrote:I want to know where peta is at with reads because I feel like he's played this day very weirdly.
I'm scared mena and lilith are scum together.
while that's possible it would require her and n_m planning the clear each other while using her jk elsewhere, because ???reasons??? which doesn't seem that likelyIn post 3056, Menalque wrote:doctor should not claim because (1) it's not, lili could have JK'd me last night