Mafiascum.net

That's exactly what I was assuming pooky. I skipped over the meta whenever I catch up because it's long and probably not worthwhile without a solid read on it myself.

She seemed to be playing within her interests in matrix.
What's your read on the ex Isis slot now?

Some selected quotes from Obv-scum Taylor:

In post 1132, Tayl0r Swift wrote:fucking just give me the scroll then.

In post 1296, Tayl0r Swift wrote:people who are town:


people who are scum:
pookyx10000
unowen
hectic

In post 1319, Tayl0r Swift wrote:im 95% confident in saying that pooky is scum and isis is town here.

In post 1689, Tayl0r Swift wrote:

In post 1657, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:I'm waiting to see what Tayl0r has to say on the matter first. If she accepts, I'd take that to see you flip.

Otherwise, I'll keep doing what I'm doing: building up a map of the gamestate and planning targets to push.

im not giving pooky the second shot though.

In post 2868, Tayl0r Swift wrote:if i get voted off i wont be passing the scroll to pooky. pooky doesnt get the scroll second.

In post 3049, Hopkirk wrote:I started the wagon not murder noraa, and I think it's got about 45-60% odds of hitting scum (good odds)

Those are insanely good odds.

there's even more posts where she states I am obv1000X scum

she also supposedly wants the scroll.

but she won't pass me the scroll.

this is obviously self-preservational in order to keep herself alive. She has no real conviction that I'm scum but she shades me over and over again. This is very similar to her play in Matrix Decipher in which she shades me as scum over and over for crap-reasons.

In post 3050, Hopkirk wrote:That's exactly what I was assuming pooky. I skipped over the meta whenever I catch up because it's long and probably not worthwhile without a solid read on it myself.

She seemed to be playing within her interests in matrix.
What's your read on the ex Isis slot now?

We have slightly more experience with Taylor and have met the more creative, less safe and sound taylor.

But we're not taylor experts,
just sayin, she's a mystery.

But wait! let's look at some other things T-Swizzle says:

In post 2566, Tayl0r Swift wrote:VOTE: bell

In post 2568, Tayl0r Swift wrote:

In post 2565, Bell wrote:VOTE: TaylorSwift

youre not even gonna address the scumslip you made and instead just gonna omgus me?

In post 2569, Tayl0r Swift wrote:

In post 2567, MURDERCAT wrote:lol

Come on, you are both town, let's do panda

bell scumslipped

In post 2579, Tayl0r Swift wrote:

In post 2576, Bell wrote:I don't think Taylor would be scum reading me as town this game.
On the other hand, TaylorSwift,
Mysterious lady.

i was townreading you until you referred to scum's wincon as "our wincon"

In post 2584, Tayl0r Swift wrote:time to update this:

people who are town:
mush
the isis slot
fidget
shelly?
bell
lld
noraa?
murdercat
(me)
adorable

Says Bell is scum for "scumslipping" comments on it multiple times, yet in the updated readlist won't even move him to scumread

yea im sure she's putting lots of thought into this

In post 3037, Vaxkiller wrote:

In post 3005, Bell wrote:It's a shame how self-aware I am and that I can't shut up with these wry observations.

Like this is just it. It's observations. Something happens and bell comments on gamestate, or calls someone scum and then no action. Then he goes off on this taylor swift nonsense which doesn't help at all and is just a distraction.

Vax is scum, bell is town

In post 3047, Noraa wrote:After it was started, his reactions were super townie(yes I agree with pooky on this one) so now everyone is kinda like "ok they be town except we ... too lazy to start a new wagon?"

You can't stop a wagon because of a person's reaction too it, scum will always manipulate it

In post 3049, Hopkirk wrote:I started the wagon not murder noraa, and I think it's got about 45-60% odds of hitting scum (good odds)

Same

In post 3054, Bell wrote:

In post 3050, Hopkirk wrote:That's exactly what I was assuming pooky. I skipped over the meta whenever I catch up because it's long and probably not worthwhile without a solid read on it myself.

She seemed to be playing within her interests in matrix.
What's your read on the ex Isis slot now?

We have slightly more experience with Taylor and have met the more creative, less safe and sound taylor.

as scum only or as scum more?

In post 3050, Hopkirk wrote:What's your read on the ex Isis slot now?

vax killer is scummy af and I don't really want to talk about her replace-out reasons because I don't think it would be appropriate.

In post 3055, Bell wrote:But we're not taylor experts,
just sayin, she's a mystery.

Im in the site wide Taylor fan club. Cant remember where but I remember her defending me somewhere and me getting forever pocketed That just how it be.

I played with her as town in which she choose to lie about a section of her role pm specifics when everyone else had the same type of role section. When she replaced out, her replacee contradicted her and got caught in a lie and mis-eliminated.

"this person defended me so i'm forever pocketed" is a really bad way to play mafia

Pooky let's work together to kill vax

i'm way more certain on taylor for the reasons I've listed above.

In post 3066, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:i'm way more certain on taylor for the reasons I've listed above.

Taylor is LHF and I know you know that.

I literally just finished a game where she tried to get me elim'd as scum with no good reasoning and she's doing the same thing here again so why wouldn't I read that as scum indicative?

also when offered trade 1:1 she refuses to take the shot - implies she doesn't actually believe her stated 95% scum-read on me. - she's more interested in keeping herself alive than shooting dead her 95% scum read. What does that tell you about her plans here?

You refused that trade too Pooky...

Vax I'll look at again sometime then. I had them as town due to the Isis replace out.

In post 3064, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:"this person defended me so i'm forever pocketed" is a really bad way to play mafia

can remember but it was a very specific situation where I found it really kind and I've never played with scum!Taylor before so I am quite a bit biased towards her.

If you give someone you think is scum a vengeful shot then it's a 2:1 not a 1:1. That's consistent with Taylor or you or anyone as town or scum. We've been over this so many times now

In post 3068, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I literally just finished a game where she tried to get me elim'd as scum with no good reasoning and she's doing the same thing here again so why wouldn't I read that as scum indicative?

also when offered trade 1:1 she refuses to take the shot - implies she doesn't actually believe her stated 95% scum-read on me. - she's more interested in keeping herself alive than shooting dead her 95% scum read. What does that tell you about her plans here?

Weird how all the LHF you are pushing just happened to roll scum this game

In post 3072, MURDERCAT wrote:

In post 3068, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I literally just finished a game where she tried to get me elim'd as scum with no good reasoning and she's doing the same thing here again so why wouldn't I read that as scum indicative?

also when offered trade 1:1 she refuses to take the shot - implies she doesn't actually believe her stated 95% scum-read on me. - she's more interested in keeping herself alive than shooting dead her 95% scum read. What does that tell you about her plans here?

Weird how all the LHF you are pushing just happened to roll scum this game

Foul.

she is stating flat out if she is given the scroll first she won't scroll me at 2.

That's not refusing a 1:1 trade or refusing a 2:1 trade. That's promising not to scroll someone she thinks is definitely scum.