Mafiascum.net

I'm Utsuho Reiuji
Kagami is China
Varsoon is Tewi Inabi

There's one more I'm missing. Whoever it was, they couldn't pronounce/spell it so they said ____ or whatever it's called.

In post 3048, Jaqen Hghar wrote:A man asks that of Desparado because Desparado himself used the same play in Castle: A Mafia Murder So Vile (I got a guilty on Mantis! lynch it!) to break a fast and as such must have intimate knowledge of such a dire ploy.

See, now that makes more sense.

I guiltied Mantis because I was already dead from hammering Huntress the day before. Whose play is that supposed to be similar to, Dan's?

- Des

In post 3076, Messiah Complex wrote:

In post 3048, Jaqen Hghar wrote:A man asks that of Desparado because Desparado himself used the same play in Castle: A Mafia Murder So Vile (I got a guilty on Mantis! lynch it!) to break a fast and as such must have intimate knowledge of such a dire ploy.

See, now that makes more sense.

I guiltied Mantis because I was already dead from hammering Huntress the day before. Whose play is that supposed to be similar to, Dan's?

- Des

Dude your syntax is making it impossible read what you write.

How is my fake-guiltying Mantis the same thing as Cabd suggesting that Lush had a guilty on Muffin???

- Des

In post 3076, Messiah Complex wrote:

In post 3048, Jaqen Hghar wrote:A man asks that of Desparado because Desparado himself used the same play in Castle: A Mafia Murder So Vile (I got a guilty on Mantis! lynch it!) to break a fast and as such must have intimate knowledge of such a dire ploy.

See, now that makes more sense.

I guiltied Mantis because I was already dead from hammering Huntress the day before. Whose play is that supposed to be similar to, Dan's?

- Des

A man wonders how you can't see the similarity in your play and that of GCBC here. A man thinks a Wolf must needs die in order to lift the veil from so many clouded eyes and to see the obvious ploy for what it is. A boy using a false guilty to further an agenda is just as scummy here as it was for Desparado to do the same in the past. Previous days events don't come into play here because a boy is using what he claims to be a guilty from another and can wriggle right out of it should town choose to allow for such mockery. Other than that, the two are the same.

In post 3077, Messiah Complex wrote:

In post 3076, Messiah Complex wrote:

In post 3048, Jaqen Hghar wrote:A man asks that of Desparado because Desparado himself used the same play in Castle: A Mafia Murder So Vile (I got a guilty on Mantis! lynch it!) to break a fast and as such must have intimate knowledge of such a dire ploy.

See, now that makes more sense.

I guiltied Mantis because I was already dead from hammering Huntress the day before. Whose play is that supposed to be similar to, Dan's?

- Des

Dude your syntax is making it impossible read what you write.

How is my fake-guiltying Mantis the same thing as Cabd suggesting that Lush had a guilty on Muffin???

- Des

Then a man will be plain.

The only difference is that you used your own false guilty as opposed to GCBC claiming a false guilty provided by another. The circumstances are the exact same otherwise. GCBC, within just seven minutes of the start of the day had a well put together case to prove the guilty from Lush. This is remarkable, so remarkable in fact I asked him to provide the crumb left by Mollie as to who they were going to investigate. It's there or I wouldn't have asked him for it.

Now, everyone knows that cabd reads really fast so they de facto believe he does cognition just as quickly. To prove that wasn't so I told him I had a question for him, which he plainly saw because he even alt slipped to rush in to sling mud. I was refreshing the thread constantly waiting for him to reply, and the moment he did I pasted my prep repaired question and posted it. If he would have answered in a timely manner then my vote would be on Muffin because he would have then demonstrated he could, in the face of the unknown, gather that evidence. 30 minutes elapsed with no reply.

This proves, unequivocally, that his case was prep repaired because he knew Lush was going to be dead.

So, we can lynch scum GCBC or most likely town Muffin to give further proof that that's what cabd did. No other lynches should even be considered, IMO.

No, they aren't. I preemptively claimed a guilty because I knew I was going to be that day's lynch. None of that is even remotely similar to what Cabd did.

- Des

I don't think Lush crumbed a target nor do I think it would make sense to decide and stick with a target given the Gaiden flip. Lush made it abundantly clear that the investigation target was muffin, the only argument for muffin's innocence is the possibility that muffin was framed in some way or another, or lush was redirected to a scum.

There's no way muffin was framed in favor of someone on Varsoon's wagon, to my mind, so we'd have to believe lush was redirected. I don't think this happened because I see no reason to think Lush was scum, and Varsoon has already claimed a redirection role.

EBWOP: no reason to think Lush was cop

In post 3082, Kagami wrote:EBWOP: no reason to think Lush was cop

A lady told a man she was a cop. If a man could read it so could scum.

Where?

And a man has held the belief throughout that Varsoon is scum. When Muffin flips town, Varsoon's fate is sealed as well.

A man will dig it up and quote it when he isn't driving.

Also waiting to see if dram will confirm no action on n1

I'm confirming that i did not visit anyone N1.
I'm also confirming that Muffin is an idiot for considering me scum, but that's besides the point.

In post 1470, Lush Life wrote:

In post 1463, Jaqen Hghar wrote:A man just explained what he thinks the team scum strategy is. A man neither thinks you slipped on purpose if he's right about that nor has he seen a boy following along with that strategy. A man sees Varsoon connected to both GCBC and the others for the too scummy and his scum meta of sitting a bus for a while with someone not being listened to. A man sees Kaze and Lush playing the too obvious route. A man sees a Kat oddly staying well clear of the other 4.

A man concedes that a boy's first post of this game is likely why he believes all revolves around himself

I am so glad you beat me to the "every1 else is scum but us" paranoia that I so often feel.

calm down, have some chillpillz and let scum sort us out cos if I am right about messiah and where that might lead to then well...we will be sorted.

A lady let on right here that she was a cop. It is right here where Jaqen cautiously backed off the slot. A man suggests you look at the interactions between Lush and a man both just before and just after this interaction to see that it is just so.

That's a pretty obtuse statement. I read it and certainly didn't think it meant cop; I interpreted that as him wanting to lynch MC and believing the scumflip would vindicate his position.

It certainly doesn't mean that he investigated MC, or he'd have surely said something about changing his mind on MC (or pushed for an MC lynch). Unless varsoon is lying about his role, scum would have to have some king of ability which, if it targets an investigator, causes them to get erroneous results. I'm more inclined to believe the simpler explanation.

Lusu would defintely have 180'd out in the open.

How about we massclaim, considering everyone is checking in claims or at least crumbing their PR in a way. Varsoon already claimed redirector, not really buying it.

We quite possibly have a vigilante in the game, or Varsoon redirected someone to GCBC hence the lackof secondary kill (this does mean SK is in play considering the game isnt multiball and the mod clarified that SK is third party or w/e)

Varsoon should probaly check in or be prodded!

I think odd-night vig is quite likely, if there wasn't a blocked kill.

Nitori Kawashiro. I will give someone a different invention tonight but I guess they have to wait another night to use it.

^thought so

I'm really curious who might be bulletproof, though. I'd guess Kaguya, Mokou, or Yoshika?

In post 3089, Kagami wrote:That's a pretty obtuse statement. I read it and certainly didn't think it meant cop; I interpreted that as him wanting to lynch MC and believing the scumflip would vindicate his position.

It certainly doesn't mean that he investigated MC, or he'd have surely said something about changing his mind on MC (or pushed for an MC lynch). Unless varsoon is lying about his role, scum would have to have some king of ability which, if it targets an investigator, causes them to get erroneous results. I'm more inclined to believe the simpler explanation.

A man didn't say that was the investigation crumb. A man said that was where he picked up what a lady was throwing down. Previous to this a man was saying he thought Lush scum. Just after, a man stopped the scum read all together. It matters naught whether you picked it up. It matters only that a man did which means it's reasonable to expect scum to have as well.

In post 3090, Katarina LeBlanc wrote:How about we massclaim, considering everyone is checking in claims or at least crumbing their PR in a way.

A man is an innocent child.

There are useful roles still hidden, and most of the outed roles have expended their shots. I don't see a reason to massclaim.

If we do go that route, let's forget popcorn and use Condorcet.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condorcet_method


Tenshi Hinanawi, Masochist, at your service.