Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2017 6:00 am
UNVOTE:
Fixed that for you.In post 3052, TTTT wrote:Deaths
Land of Xanth, Town Watcher, died Night 1.
Ssbm_Kyouko, Vanilla Townie, lynched Day 2.
Claims
James claimed 1-shot cop with guilty on Comm
Comm claimed rolecop with check on Fitz
Ram claimed Jailkeeper with Fitz targeted
Fitz claimed VT
If James is townand sn role claimed, Comm is confscum.
If Ram is townand is role claimed,Comm is confscum.Fitz was either the killer stopped or was protected from the kill or neither if SSBM was nked night1
If Comm is town, Jamesis lying scum or lying town& Ramare confscum.is still town
Also, scum could have targeted ssbm night 1for reasons that I, TTTT, will expound upon later
which would result in the no-kill N2.
N1 kill on LoX from SK power (see prior games)?And SK n2 kill wne ts eomwhere, which I, TTTT, will expound upon later.
VOTE: Comm
Maybe they didn't want him lynched?In post 3053, Almost50 wrote:Why would Scum target ssbm on N1 AND let him get lynched on D2?? That's a wasted shot. Besides, why ssbm in the first place? Again, why him over TWO Cop claims (one of which must be Town)?In post 3052, TTTT wrote:Also, scum could have targeted ssbm night 1
Also, where is the SK kill for N2 then?
to save Fitz, cause i straight up said i rbed him, no kill, so Fitz getting ropeIn post 3076, Vifam wrote:Plus like why would Scum Comm claim to rolecop Fitz of all people like I just don't see it
Done.In post 3071, TTTT wrote:If this is wrong will someone point it out plzIn post 3052, TTTT wrote:If James is town, Comm is confscum.
If Ram is town, Comm is confscum.
If Comm is town, James & Ram are confscum.
You're talking about the "basic" version, and he's assuming the variant! Hmmmm...In post 3063, Ramcius wrote:huh? Is it me stupid and don't know how JK works, or Fitz asking dumb question?
If the 1-shot Town Cop got a guilty on someone, he does not explain the logic behind why that guilty person could be offering bad information.In post 3072, Almost50 wrote:Refer to the very first post of the day by Comm where he offers to tell us a name w/o a role, or a role w/o a name.In post 3062, PeregrineV wrote:In post 2986, James3 wrote:Comm is guilty. There is now no reason to delay lynching him.
VOTE: CommKnightUhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhIn post 2988, James3 wrote:Note that Comm's offer deliberately precludes him proving that hes actually a rolecop (not that that would prove his alignment). If he just town-confirms someone, that won't show that he knows their role. If he simply states that a role is in the game, there will be no way to disprove it.
The variant with a name, which is not the claim Ram made.In post 3081, Almost50 wrote:You're talking about the "basic" version, and he's assuming the variant! Hmmmm...In post 3063, Ramcius wrote:huh? Is it me stupid and don't know how JK works, or Fitz asking dumb question?
Sine YOU are the JK, you should ask the mod via PM to clarify on whether your role is the "Base Role" or the one under 'Variations" on the wiki page.
We couldn't lynch Wifam D1, but mafia let lynch their NK D2? Keeping in mind 2 slots were empty, scum could easily trow us on someone else, when RC started fight against Kyo wagon, or even before that, tehy could just straight up call out people for sheeping their NK wagonIn post 3078, PeregrineV wrote:Maybe they didn't want him lynched?In post 3053, Almost50 wrote:Why would Scum target ssbm on N1 AND let him get lynched on D2?? That's a wasted shot. Besides, why ssbm in the first place? Again, why him over TWO Cop claims (one of which must be Town)?In post 3052, TTTT wrote:Also, scum could have targeted ssbm night 1
Also, where is the SK kill for N2 then?
Maybe it was docced, blocked, or otherwise interfered with.
no, my role says target will be protected from all kills and will be unable to perform any action, so i assume it's basic versionIn post 3081, Almost50 wrote:You're talking about the "basic" version, and he's assuming the variant! Hmmmm...In post 3063, Ramcius wrote:huh? Is it me stupid and don't know how JK works, or Fitz asking dumb question?
Sine YOU are the JK, you should ask the mod via PM to clarify on whether your role is the "Base Role" or the one under 'Variations" on the wiki page.
Read the wiki again. Under "Variations" it says another variant of the JK role makes it's target untargetable to ALL acions, and is sometimes referred to as Alien.In post 3066, Ramcius wrote:I like this, i really do, why i'm in deep shit? My role have no interaction with Comm results, and it's Fitz, who counter Comm words, i went to read wiki, and i couldn't find anything about JK preventing other people from checking target, just about normal roleblock - target can't use any active abilitiesIn post 3061, Almost50 wrote:Actually;
VOTE: Comm
Flipping him is probably the only way to understand his weird result/claim. If he flips Town Role Cop though, both James and Ramcius will be in deep shit.
Personally, I doubt SSBM as the nighkill, but if he caught a player as scum before, they could have considered him a threat. Or maybe he crumbed something. Don;t really know.In post 3084, Ramcius wrote:We couldn't lynch Wifam D1, but mafia let lynch their NK D2? Keeping in mind 2 slots were empty, scum could easily trow us on someone else, when RC started fight against Kyo wagon, or even before that, tehy could just straight up call out people for sheeping their NK wagonIn post 3078, PeregrineV wrote:Maybe they didn't want him lynched?In post 3053, Almost50 wrote:Why would Scum target ssbm on N1 AND let him get lynched on D2?? That's a wasted shot. Besides, why ssbm in the first place? Again, why him over TWO Cop claims (one of which must be Town)?In post 3052, TTTT wrote:Also, scum could have targeted ssbm night 1
Also, where is the SK kill for N2 then?
Maybe it was docced, blocked, or otherwise interfered with.
Then that would give us two scum when if he just said he rolecopped anyone else we'd just get 1, why would he do thatIn post 3079, Ramcius wrote:to save Fitz, cause i straight up said i rbed him, no kill, so Fitz getting ropeIn post 3076, Vifam wrote:Plus like why would Scum Comm claim to rolecop Fitz of all people like I just don't see it
Yes.In post 3086, Ramcius wrote:no, my role says target will be protected from all kills and will be unable to perform any action, so i assume it's basic versionIn post 3081, Almost50 wrote:You're talking about the "basic" version, and he's assuming the variant! Hmmmm...In post 3063, Ramcius wrote:huh? Is it me stupid and don't know how JK works, or Fitz asking dumb question?
Sine YOU are the JK, you should ask the mod via PM to clarify on whether your role is the "Base Role" or the one under 'Variations" on the wiki page.
The variants have names for a reason.In post 3087, Almost50 wrote:Read the wiki again. Under "Variations" it says another variant of the JK role makes it's target untargetable to ALL acions, and is sometimes referred to as Alien.In post 3066, Ramcius wrote:I like this, i really do, why i'm in deep shit? My role have no interaction with Comm results, and it's Fitz, who counter Comm words, i went to read wiki, and i couldn't find anything about JK preventing other people from checking target, just about normal roleblock - target can't use any active abilitiesIn post 3061, Almost50 wrote:Actually;
VOTE: Comm
Flipping him is probably the only way to understand his weird result/claim. If he flips Town Role Cop though, both James and Ramcius will be in deep shit.
However, I have never seen the term Alien being used for a JK, but I have seen the version where the JK prevented it's target from being Copped as well as from being killed. In fact, I always assumed it to be the genera case not the variant!
it makes sense when you consider there is a claimed guilty from a player who claimed cop day1PeregrineV wrote:These Comm votes don't make sense to me.
Who knows, then Fitz lie and he's some towny looking scum role, so we should lynch Fitz firstIn post 3089, Vifam wrote:Then that would give us two scum when if he just said he rolecopped anyone else we'd just get 1, why would he do thatIn post 3079, Ramcius wrote:to save Fitz, cause i straight up said i rbed him, no kill, so Fitz getting ropeIn post 3076, Vifam wrote:Plus like why would Scum Comm claim to rolecop Fitz of all people like I just don't see it
Who then proceeds to make his result look fake with all his followup posting.In post 3092, TTTT wrote:it makes sense when you consider there is a claimed guilty from a player who claimed cop day1PeregrineV wrote:These Comm votes don't make sense to me.
Who? Commknight? He claimed roelcop.In post 3092, TTTT wrote:it doesn't make sense when you consider that if he is cop he should be dead
Yeah, that's why I refuse to jump to conclusions. James and Comm need to be questioned way more.In post 3092, TTTT wrote: but nothing is making any sense
I feel like we are either getting several scum lynched once this is all sorted out
or we have lying town
Since we're going wild with possibilities, and with this game explicitly NOT "normal"; I'd say;In post 3071, TTTT wrote:If this is wrong will someone point it out plzIn post 3052, TTTT wrote:If James is town, Comm is confscum.
If Ram is town, Comm is confscum.
If Comm is town, James & Ram are confscum.