Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2018 10:10 am
youre claiming pr?
this post-hammer vote is fascinating to me
Then how about you give me your opinion?In post 3062, Taly wrote:I never said that I had no opinion.In post 3007, Ausuka wrote: What? How can you have no opinions on players outside the unclaimed players?
I do have opinions, and they're fluctuating a lot.
And? Does this mean that their play can't be read into?In post 3062, Taly wrote: But I see no point in discussing the people who claimed because I have no way in hell to validate someone's claim as 100% conf.
You don't need to fit the claim into your narrative! All I want to hear is your opinions on their play.In post 3062, Taly wrote: Nor do I know how that'd fit into a town or scum narrative for that person's alignment.
What??? How does this day phase prove anything like that? The VAST majority of the time has been spent discussing unclaimed players. There is scum outside of these players. You don't need to speculate about the claim of an unclaimed player. Like anyone else in the game who isn't clear, their PLAY can and should come under scrutiny.In post 3062, Taly wrote: Discussing claimed players in a large on D2 - this dayphase proves - is mostly speculation AND associative discussion that literally has no clear answer or help at all for the town.
Correct me if I'm wrong but as far as I know everyone who has claimed a power role had done things not at all related to being a power role.In post 3062, Taly wrote:It's very likely, but I have my own suspects right now, and sorting the motives of how EACH player claimed their role and why is begging for both WIFOM and a great lack of clarity.In post 3007, Ausuka wrote:Don't you think some of them have to be scum?
It seems to me that claimed players are the players you know the least about. So why aren't you trying to sort them?In post 3062, Taly wrote:I want to sort players I know the least about, I want to flip players that I think are very possible partners toIn post 3007, Ausuka wrote:Don't you think some of them have to be scum?Dram, not an associative or speculated SvT to another living player right now.
Scum will most definitely be weeded out amongst claimed players soon.
And?In post 3062, Taly wrote:At least 3 other people have shared a sentiment very similar to this... just with different names, and "don't lynch" as well.Ausuka wrote:When I die don't let MOI endgame btw
You're not obvtown and I don't think there's anything wrong with what I said at all!In post 3062, Taly wrote:In post 3036, Ausuka wrote:Taly's town in a surface level way but please be wary of him. He is capable of being surface level obvtown as scum. If it's multiball the 3 scum thing is damning and the fact he refuses to talk about claimed players and thinks all the unclaimed players are scum is also fairly damning.In post 3034, Ausuka wrote:OK so I might be a bit spammy this twilight because I don't want to put effort into writing a post and then lose it all.
The most important thing to remember is that MOI is scum not just on role but on play too. His recent ISO is pretty scummy I think, and I've given my thoughts about him.1)You're deliberately doubtcasting me by using my own potential as a scumplayer?
I've been doubtcasted AND mislynched in games as power-obvtown because people thought I was a deepwolf.
It's not 100%"Taly's going to skate by as obvtown since he's OP as scum! Hehehe!"
There ARE towntells and scumtells in my play. You have played with me several times, and while I can't hold you to a specific approach on me, I don't feel good that you're stating I'm surface-level town while not trying to resolve your weariness of me.
It feels like you're intentionally generating uncertainty.
I'll find it now!In post 3062, Taly wrote:it's almost like I used the word "if"In post 3062, Taly wrote:
2) WE HAVE NO CONFIRMED WAY TO TELL THAT THIS IS MULTIBALL.Based off thread information, unless you believeTWis an SK, I don't know why you're making an argument that my suspects are"damning"to my alignment...
Do you know something about the setup that I don't?
Yes I obviously didn't mean you think literally all of them are scum. The point remains that it is consistently your suspect pool and you don't appear to have been sorting any of them as town.In post 3062, Taly wrote:3) READ MY READ PROGRESSION.I haveNOT ONCEsaid thatALLthe people in{Sky/HWS/profii/A50/xyzzy}are scum, but I believe there's a strong argument for more than one person in this group to be scum.
In post 3062, Taly wrote:
4)Where did you get the"3 strong-scum read conviction"from me? Have you read my cases and thoughts this dayphase?
yup but I'm several stages past hammered anyway so not like it matters, unless governor got secretly whitelisted as a normal role while none of us were lookingIn post 3075, Raskolnikov wrote:youre claiming pr?
Here it is! You also asked me what I thought of a 3 player dram/sky/HWS team.In post 1729, Taly wrote:I mean, 3 person scumteam isn't unusual for 17-18p.
And with the chance of an SK or 3p being here, I'm think 3p scum is MORE likely at the moment.
At the very least, I just thinkElbirnandSkyhave a huge associative argument together and withDram
@Almost50: you quoted the post where he didIn post 3018, profii wrote:it's hard enough keeping a track of the deadline in the game let alone anything else.
I think we should push xyzzy to L-1 - get the claim and go from there to the next target (me please)
VOTE: xyzzy
were you even in police academyIn post 3052, Ausuka wrote:Please tell me more about my method of discrediting Nosferatu.
By the way @town: I do have experience with Nos and have read him correctly in NY 211 and police academy based on how his town vs scum games look. This so far is his scum game.
Well, let's put him to L-1 isn't the same as declaring him @L-1.In post 3089, Nosferatu wrote:@Almost50: you quoted the post where he didIn post 3018, profii wrote:it's hard enough keeping a track of the deadline in the game let alone anything else.
I think we should push xyzzy to L-1 - get the claim and go from there to the next target (me please)
VOTE: xyzzy
Yes, I was part of the sgba hydra. I never posted but I talked to tn about the game on discord and I was townreading you.In post 3090, Nosferatu wrote:were you even in police academyIn post 3052, Ausuka wrote:Please tell me more about my method of discrediting Nosferatu.
By the way @town: I do have experience with Nos and have read him correctly in NY 211 and police academy based on how his town vs scum games look. This so far is his scum game.
also you said he's just making stuff up which isn't really true
i meant that the next vote would be L-1In post 3091, Almost50 wrote:Well, let's put him to L-1 isn't the same as declaring him @L-1.In post 3089, Nosferatu wrote:@Almost50: you quoted the post where he didIn post 3018, profii wrote:it's hard enough keeping a track of the deadline in the game let alone anything else.
I think we should push xyzzy to L-1 - get the claim and go from there to the next target (me please)
VOTE: xyzzy
So, did you think you were hammering xy??
No, so am I.In post 3049, Raskolnikov wrote:is it bad that im optimistic xyzzy flips scum
In post 3009, Chickadee wrote:VOTE: xyzzy
That's L-3
I'm not mentally in this game at the moment. There was a time today when I was, and now we're dragging. We've over talked everything today. Someone jus
These 2 posts don’t make me confident that xyzzy is scumIn post 3010, Chickadee wrote:Accidentally hit submit. Oops.
Someone just push something through. We all know the lynch pool.