Mafiascum.net

In post 3072, Aristeia wrote:it is so so so so so scumsiding to pick bulletproof instead of ascetic i cant believe you guys are seriously considering letting Enchant get away with this

scum ascetic cop can't get guiltied by tracker, can't get roleblocked
there's scum utility in picking that as well

no it means if someone does something obviously pro-scum

you

like if someone quickhammers a town doctor on d1 without giving them a chance to claim

you

you don't go "hey this person quickhammers all the time so let's just tolerate it"

In post 3075, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 3072, Aristeia wrote:it is so so so so so scumsiding to pick bulletproof instead of ascetic i cant believe you guys are seriously considering letting Enchant get away with this

scum ascetic cop can't get guiltied by tracker, can't get roleblocked
there's scum utility in picking that as well

Enchant gets guiltied by anything this game he doesn’t get a result on because he claimed BP in a protown manner

I am 100% okay forcing scum to waste their shot on Roden for a 50/50 if Enchant is scum.

I don’t think he is though.

So you're advocating for a form of policy limming? Not trying to use the phrase as a criticism but it sounds like a kind of policy.

In post 3076, Aristeia wrote:no it means if someone does something obviously pro-scum

you

KILL THEM

like if someone quickhammers a town doctor on d1 without giving them a chance to claim

you

KILL THEM

you don't go "hey this person quickhammers all the time so let's just tolerate it"

VOTE: Ari

Okay my vote is you kill you tomorrow if Enchant is conf town tonight

And flip me today to prove Enchant conf

Since you’re being pro scum we kill you

Idk I can totally see the thought process of “muahahaha scum are going to think I’m a big scary role but then they’ll shoot me and FAIL!!”

Is it bad that I might’ve been tempted by that?

In post 3080, Wallflower wrote:Is it bad that I might’ve been tempted by that?

What do you mean? Tempted to take bulletproof for that reason, or tempted to accept that line of logic potentially coming from Enchant?

In post 3075, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 3072, Aristeia wrote:it is so so so so so scumsiding to pick bulletproof instead of ascetic i cant believe you guys are seriously considering letting Enchant get away with this

scum ascetic cop can't get guiltied by tracker, can't get roleblocked
there's scum utility in picking that as well

Pick #1 going for Bulletproof over Ascetic Cop is terrible town play and should be treated as a scum claim.

You are literally denying the town a cop for to soak maybe one nightkill if you can get townread[WHICH HE DIDNT EVEN TRY TO DO SO WHAT ARE WE ARGUING ABOUT]

he literally entered today trying to pretend he was an ascetic cop and softing an inno on MB and then changed his mind when MB was a viable elimination.

How much more blatant of a mafia-play do you need here??

In post 3079, MathBlade wrote:

In post 3076, Aristeia wrote:no it means if someone does something obviously pro-scum

you

KILL THEM

like if someone quickhammers a town doctor on d1 without giving them a chance to claim

you

KILL THEM

you don't go "hey this person quickhammers all the time so let's just tolerate it"

VOTE: Ari

Okay my vote is you kill you tomorrow if Enchant is conf town tonight

And flip me today to prove Enchant conf

Since you’re being pro scum we kill you

can u stop defending scum from me dude

I tolerated your defense of HEM but this defense of Enchant too is just more scum siding lol

In post 3078, implosion wrote:So you're advocating for a form of policy limming? Not trying to use the phrase as a criticism but it sounds like a kind of policy.

this isn't even policy limming

this is limming someone who is playing blatantly anti-town

In post 3082, Aristeia wrote:

In post 3075, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 3072, Aristeia wrote:it is so so so so so scumsiding to pick bulletproof instead of ascetic i cant believe you guys are seriously considering letting Enchant get away with this

scum ascetic cop can't get guiltied by tracker, can't get roleblocked
there's scum utility in picking that as well

Pick #1 going for Bulletproof over Ascetic Cop is terrible town play and should be treated as a scum claim.

You are literally denying the town a cop for to soak maybe one nightkill if you can get townread[WHICH HE DIDNT EVEN TRY TO DO SO WHAT ARE WE ARGUING ABOUT]

he literally entered today trying to pretend he was an ascetic cop and softing an inno on MB and then changed his mind when MB was a viable elimination.

How much more blatant of a mafia-play do you need here??

Nope I don’t treat it as a scum claim people act differently

If Enchant is Ascetic Roden will see it
Doc on Roden if it exists

Problem solved.

Denying town cop for an unlimmable conf town is a fair trade imho

In post 3084, Aristeia wrote:I tolerated your defense of HEM but this defense of Enchant too is just more scum siding lol

Then vote me.

Confirm Enchant as BP town

Lock town unelimmable I am fine with that

Doc on Roden means we lose the JK

In post 3087, MathBlade wrote:

In post 3084, Aristeia wrote:I tolerated your defense of HEM but this defense of Enchant too is just more scum siding lol

Then vote me.

Confirm Enchant as BP town

Lock town unelimmable I am fine with that

you being vanilla town doesn't mean Enchant is BP town

In post 3088, Aristeia wrote:Doc on Roden means we lose the JK

Then we do.

But in the process we gain a scum or town conf.

In post 3089, Aristeia wrote:

In post 3087, MathBlade wrote:

In post 3084, Aristeia wrote:I tolerated your defense of HEM but this defense of Enchant too is just more scum siding lol

Then vote me.

Confirm Enchant as BP town

Lock town unelimmable I am fine with that

you being vanilla town doesn't mean Enchant is BP town

It does because of the missing kill

In post 3091, MathBlade wrote:

In post 3089, Aristeia wrote:

In post 3087, MathBlade wrote:

In post 3084, Aristeia wrote:I tolerated your defense of HEM but this defense of Enchant too is just more scum siding lol

Then vote me.

Confirm Enchant as BP town

Lock town unelimmable I am fine with that

you being vanilla town doesn't mean Enchant is BP town

It does because of the missing kill

not true there is probably a doctor

In post 3086, MathBlade wrote:

In post 3082, Aristeia wrote:

In post 3075, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 3072, Aristeia wrote:it is so so so so so scumsiding to pick bulletproof instead of ascetic i cant believe you guys are seriously considering letting Enchant get away with this

scum ascetic cop can't get guiltied by tracker, can't get roleblocked
there's scum utility in picking that as well

Pick #1 going for Bulletproof over Ascetic Cop is terrible town play and should be treated as a scum claim.

You are literally denying the town a cop for to soak maybe one nightkill if you can get townread[WHICH HE DIDNT EVEN TRY TO DO SO WHAT ARE WE ARGUING ABOUT]

he literally entered today trying to pretend he was an ascetic cop and softing an inno on MB and then changed his mind when MB was a viable elimination.

How much more blatant of a mafia-play do you need here??

Nope I don’t treat it as a scum claim people act differently

If Enchant is Ascetic Roden will see it
Doc on Roden if it exists

Problem solved.

Denying town cop for an unlimmable conf town is a fair trade imho

bulletproof if conf town is an assured town slot in any endgame scenario
so yeah, Ari arguing to vote out Enchant now, before he's had a chance to get confirmed, is really fucking sus.

In post 3090, MathBlade wrote:

In post 3088, Aristeia wrote:Doc on Roden means we lose the JK

Then we do.

But in the process we gain a scum or town conf.

no because if roden confirms enchant is bulletproof he can still be scum bulletproof

In post 3093, Gamma Emerald wrote:bulletproof if conf town is an assured town slot in any endgame scenario
so yeah, Ari arguing to vote out Enchant now, before he's had a chance to get confirmed, is really fucking sus.

there is literally no way to confirm enchant what r u talking about

In post 3092, Aristeia wrote:

In post 3091, MathBlade wrote:

In post 3089, Aristeia wrote:

In post 3087, MathBlade wrote:

In post 3084, Aristeia wrote:I tolerated your defense of HEM but this defense of Enchant too is just more scum siding lol

Then vote me.

Confirm Enchant as BP town

Lock town unelimmable I am fine with that

you being vanilla town doesn't mean Enchant is BP town

It does because of the missing kill

not true there is probably a doctor

Then said doc would be on Roden if it exists. If doc goes rogue then another no kill happens possibly

But if Roden dies I am going to think doc doesn’t exist

In post 3092, Aristeia wrote:not true there is probably a doctor

unless you're doctor you have no way of knowing this as town, and if you are doctor what the fuck are lecturing me for softing not-doc/rb when you're basically doing the same?

In post 3096, MathBlade wrote:

In post 3092, Aristeia wrote:

In post 3091, MathBlade wrote:

In post 3089, Aristeia wrote:

In post 3087, MathBlade wrote:

In post 3084, Aristeia wrote:I tolerated your defense of HEM but this defense of Enchant too is just more scum siding lol

Then vote me.

Confirm Enchant as BP town

Lock town unelimmable I am fine with that

you being vanilla town doesn't mean Enchant is BP town

It does because of the missing kill

not true there is probably a doctor

Then said doc would be on Roden if it exists. If doc goes rogue then another no kill happens possibly

But if Roden dies I am going to think doc doesn’t exist

so we lim you - you flip vanilla town

so doc protects roden

roden checks enchant finds he is not ascetic so possibly scum bulletproof

ausuka dies at night

ok what now

In post 3095, Aristeia wrote:

In post 3093, Gamma Emerald wrote:bulletproof if conf town is an assured town slot in any endgame scenario
so yeah, Ari arguing to vote out Enchant now, before he's had a chance to get confirmed, is really fucking sus.

there is literally no way to confirm enchant what r u talking about

I already fucking explained how several pages ago. No I'm not repeating it, go read it for yourself!