Mafiascum.net

I don't like random voting and I like to get a feel of the group by asking those questions. Kayne why are you on elle?

*headdesk*

rinse, lather, repeat

Read her iso, she's probably scum.

In post 3094, Titus wrote:What are the reasons behind the major wagons? I would like to keep those in mind as I start my read.

What 'major wagons'? The one on you?

...how about you go read the game and see where people have *already* provided their reasons instead of disturbing the flow of the game by insisting on repetition? That'd be swell, some proactivity and whatnot. Summaries are for scum QTs.

I didn't read her iso.

All I remember is her thor vote

VOTE: Elle

In post 3082, SafetyDance wrote:

In post 3063, Tammy wrote:Also also why did you accuse zdenek of role fishing for asking why you chose nautilus to track, then come out today and say quadz did nothing?

Um, what? I've been claiming my results since the start of D2. After I was made to claim D1 I'm pretty sure that was what was expected of me. If it wasn't then I'm quite annoyed, I would have kept quiet otherwise like everyone else. No idea how you can connect revealing your own information as role-fishing but whatever. I have enough headache with Tierce to try and make sense of YOUR ramblings.

And why would I track or block one of my scum reads when they know what my reads are, know I have use of them and would simply avoid doing anything?

In post 3064, Tammy wrote:And a triple also, sometimes following Tammy onto a wagon brings about awesome results.

In post 2191, Tammy wrote:VOTE: spyrex

Vote-camping without a reason should be followed? Riiiight...

Yes, but when Zdenek asked you why you tracked Nautilus you went wawawah you're rolefishing!

So, you blocked quadz last night and you have nothing more to say or think about that?

I parked my vote on scum because you know he was scum, and me voting a scum read (whom I did talk about throughout the day) is a hell of a lot better reason to sheep me than to sheep me when I'm blatantly voting someone because they asked me to just so you can prove some puerile point.

wait. Did SD claim to roleblock Quadz or not?

If so lynch Quadz imo

In post 3107, PrideandJoy wrote:wait. Did SD claim to roleblock Quadz or not?

We're waiting on this. His Excellency thinks it's better to spout nonsensical hatred than clarifying things people are clearly puzzled about. Don't worry, he'll be back in three days to vote a nullread for 'noise' and ask people to go back to the newbie queue.

well if he roleblocked Quadz N2, then w/e no point voting for Quadz. If N3, then yes, lynch Quadz. simple stuff

Prideandjoy, I think the Miller claim is genuine. However, I can see where some would disagree. Why is voting a claimed miller bad?

Tammy do you think elle hardbussed Spyrex to avoid scumhunting given Spyrex was in a policy lynch situation? (supposing that Spyrex hammered without a claim with only reading ISOs)

I am not seeing ellescum. I know that makes it more likely to be lynched but I am not oing to push a bad lynch to sav myself.

...can we have the mad fox back, please?

The person who claimed Miller is dead, flipped Town, Titus.

In post 3110, Titus wrote:Prideandjoy, I think the Miller claim is genuine.

I agree, the miller claim that we lynched on D1 and flipped town was very genuine.

P-edit: god fucking dammit Tierce I hate you so much.

In post 3112, Alfred Borden wrote:P-edit: god fucking dammit Tierce I hate you so much.

It's spotlight and I'm going to keep shining it on , thank you very much~ You can be my echo-dragon, though. Always nice to have a pet dragon.

We know the claim is true. Let me rephrase. Knowing what we knew then, why is voting a claimed miller bad? I could see claiming being a scum gambit?

*yawn*

better question, titus: who gives a shit? why are you discussing irrelevant theory?

It is not theory. I am trying to see the reasons behind PJ's vote. PJ is voting elle because Elle voted Thor. I see nothing wrong with that voting. Why so defensive?

In post 3109, PrideandJoy wrote:well if he roleblocked Quadz N2, then w/e no point voting for Quadz. If N3, then yes, lynch Quadz. simple stuff

Quadz, nothing on this?

Titus, appreciating that you've just replaced into a long-ass game, but if we were in your position we'd be pretty sure that the question of "well, uh, guys, is it so wrong to vote for a claimed miller" might well have been addressed at some point in the preceding 125 pages and multiple elle votes. Iso anyone voting for elle and ctrl+f 'Thor' or 'miller', the answers will be there.

That said, this head thinks that it can read Titus pretty well - in that it notices quickly when he's scum - and so far the impression is 'not scum'. Which is where we were before.

Waiting for SafetyDance and blah blah etc but seriously kill elle with fire.

In post 3110, Titus wrote:Prideandjoy, I think the Miller claim is genuine. However, I can see where some would disagree. Why is voting a claimed miller bad?

We can't really see why some people would disagree. then again 13 people came together to lynch Thor. of those, I have some as more town than others and am willing to put it down to flawed judgement. Elle is the leftover + her voting Thor highlighted his claim more than others as a reason to lynch him (the notion of lynching people based off a miller claim I find repulsive)

In post 3120, PrideandJoy wrote:(the notion of lynching people based off a miller claim I find repulsive)

Good thing noone here did that.

your right I'm pretty sure achieveing a mislynch was good enough for the scum voting him

thatdoesn'tmakeanysensescumtypicallywanttoachievemislynches

negging doesn't work