Mafiascum.net

Masochist is your role name? Do you know why you have that role?

i.e. why your flavor is appropriate for the role?

I'm no flavor expert but it mentions that my body is ready (heh, NOA joke) and if I do something bad to punish me?

And it mentions a tidbit about no "regular" nightkill being able to affect me, which I now take to mean that the strongman was there. Scum might have a oneshot poison or something as well.

Interesting, yours is the only role so far that's reliant on doujin for the flavor->role, but it's believable enough.

Which reminds me, GiF srsly screwed up by not having Sanae be the IC (you're a good girl, Sanae~)

In post 3104, Kagami wrote:Which reminds me, GiF srsly screwed up by not having Sanae be the IC (you're a good girl, Sanae~)

I was thinking that a while ago lol.

Eirin Yagakoro

VT

We are massclaim why?
also, feels like I'm being rused
whatever
I'm pretty sick so I'm not gonna be very active. ;_;

In post 3107, Varsoon wrote:We are massclaim why?

no idea but i thought we were so i claimed

don't think it really hurts now at this point. > 1/2 the game is claimed I tihnk

A man would point out that ne claims mean essentially nothing. A man's name is that of a bad girl and yet is innocent. Flips have indicated as much as well.

The only value I see is that

A) Based on Gaiden's opening post, scum likely don't have fake-claims (or at least not fake flavor-claims)
B) flavor and roles match fairly well

So it could easily be possible to infer a scummy role from flavor claims

maybe? I wouldn't have placed reimu as a strongman encryptor for example

Def agree with that, but sakuya ninja makes perfect sense.

Btw, why do you think missing the motivate was a big deal?

In post 3111, Kagami wrote:A) Based on Gaiden's opening post, scum likely don't have fake-claims (or at least not fake flavor-claims)

I'm almost positive he was just joking

also keep in mind I've said not to CC. there are behavioral reasons zmuffin is scum here (and I'd go nacho scum too bc why the hell not). I'd be fine with a possible CC if it'd make everyone feel better, though obv it'd happen anyway if we massclaim

I'm Koishi btw

In post 3114, Kagami wrote:Btw, why do you think missing the motivate was a big deal?

it's a free investigate? Also I have never missed a night action before

I'd be surprised if it gave you a third shot though

Cirno should be roleblocker then!

I did the do.

I almost want to believe him tho

In post 3115, pieguyn wrote: (and I'd go nacho scum too bc why the hell not).

A man has only ever seen Nacho yolobus. A man keeps his own thoughts on the subject at bay while noting that those who should have given question to that entry haven't. This is troubling.

pieguy wrote:also keep in mind I've said not to CC. there are behavioral reasons zmuffin is scum here (and I'd go nacho scum too bc why the hell not). I'd be fine with a possible CC if it'd make everyone feel better, though obv it'd happen anyway if we massclaim

pieguy, you don't know how to read my behaviour as well as you think you do. or you're being stubborn here. i dunno

there will be no tracker counter-claim

and the funny thing is even with a flipped ninja and me claiming tracker with no counter-claim, meaning i'm practically IC-level inno, you're still probably going to be stubborn about this

Does a Wolf see the implications of and the good which may come out of his lynch? It'll confirm 2 scum if a Wolf can be trusted.

If House Lush got a guilty on Muffin and Muffin flips scum...

Varsoon is a redirector. This is known.

GCBC's D3 entry with the quick evidence pushing Muffin comes off pre-prepared since a boy couldn't duplicate comparable speed with an unexpected question. A boy had to have know before daybreak that house Lush fell.