Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2018 11:19 am
Did you look through VCs?
Help Scum Bus is a good motto motto.In post 3089, Firebringer wrote:Like normally id think this is a pocket post for Dino to hop but I think they are just scumIn post 3075, Mathdino wrote:Like, Hopkirk, if I knew you were town, then yeah Fire/N_M would be the obvious call.
If it's not that, it's Fire/Flubber.
And a lot of Dino posts feel Pockety
Where u beenIn post 3097, Not_Mafia wrote:Yeah so it’s Sheep/Dino/Hop confirmed now
In post 3076, Hopkirk wrote:1- Why are you positive Sheep would treat him scumteam the same?In post 3072, Mathdino wrote:Go read my case on sheep not being scum with Fire. sheep's attitude toward the two of their slots has been wildly different.
It's hard for me to prove that to a theoretical town-you because the case is based around sheep treating you and N_M similarly, and Flubber and Fire similarly.
sheep was setting them up for mislynch, not you.
2- I disagree that they're as different as you are saying. Sheep makes light/meaingless comments on both and essential null reads both.
In post 3084, Hopkirk wrote:Also @Dino: Fire/Ser/NM are never under any pressure. Sheep is free to say what he likes about them since nobody is paying attention to those slots given the much bigger issues going on. What he does say is minor at best.
See now this post feels like ur trying to pocket meIn post 3102, Mathdino wrote:Help Scum Bus is a good motto motto.In post 3089, Firebringer wrote:Like normally id think this is a pocket post for Dino to hop but I think they are just scumIn post 3075, Mathdino wrote:Like, Hopkirk, if I knew you were town, then yeah Fire/N_M would be the obvious call.
If it's not that, it's Fire/Flubber.
And a lot of Dino posts feel Pockety
I'm okay with pocketing scum as long as it means I can get the right lynch. A lot of LyLos end up that way for me.
What you're reading as pockety is the fact that I fundamentally treat small gamestates like this politically. I need to think about the votes I need to get in order to get this lynch.
And if you're unwilling to vote N_M right now, and scum is willing to bus him, I'm fine with that. At that point it's just katy/Flubber/HEM that I need to convince.
My (biased) interpretation is that Hopkirk doesn't think he can win a 1v1 with me, so he's scrambling to make the Fire lynch plausible after N_M potentially goes down today. He's distancing himself from N_M by openly not including me in possible scumteams.
This is a sweeping statement that’s absolutely untrue!In post 3109, Hopkirk wrote:There is no town motivation from Fire or Serg.
Why would you only consider how Sheep treats them but not how they treat Sheep...In post 3110, Mathdino wrote:I'm not reading this based off of either ISO because I recognise that I'm barely able to read them. I'm solving this based on sheep's scumclaim and ISO.
When has this been a thing?In post 3110, Mathdino wrote:I'm not reading this based off of either ISO because I recognise that I'm barely able to read them. I'm solving this based on sheep's scumclaim and ISO.
You still have questions for Hopkirk?In post 3112, Katyusha wrote:This is a sweeping statement that’s absolutely untrue!In post 3109, Hopkirk wrote:There is no town motivation from Fire or Serg.
When i’m back I’m going to be asking math and hop a lot of questions so hang tight
You're ignoring the part where idc about Serg/Fire's ISOs cuz I don't expect to be able to read them for shit.In post 3114, Hopkirk wrote:Serg makes minor pushes at 5 confirmed town (from both our perspectives), ignores NM/Sheep, and subs out.
In post 3117, Firebringer wrote:When has this been a thing?In post 3110, Mathdino wrote:I'm not reading this based off of either ISO because I recognise that I'm barely able to read them. I'm solving this based on sheep's scumclaim and ISO.
When have I claimed to be able to read you? I also literally don't know Sergtacos or Hopkirk.In post 3117, Firebringer wrote:When has this been a thing?In post 3110, Mathdino wrote:I'm not reading this based off of either ISO because I recognise that I'm barely able to read them. I'm solving this based on sheep's scumclaim and ISO.
I feel like you're not engaging with me because you're conf.biased here. You haven't explained why Scum-Sheep needs to treat his partners in a specific way when they're not under any suspicious all game. He has no incentive to do that.In post 3105, Hopkirk wrote:@Dino: thoughts on this?In post 3076, Hopkirk wrote:1- Why are you positive Sheep would treat him scumteam the same?In post 3072, Mathdino wrote:Go read my case on sheep not being scum with Fire. sheep's attitude toward the two of their slots has been wildly different.
It's hard for me to prove that to a theoretical town-you because the case is based around sheep treating you and N_M similarly, and Flubber and Fire similarly.
sheep was setting them up for mislynch, not you.
2- I disagree that they're as different as you are saying. Sheep makes light/meaingless comments on both and essential null reads both.In post 3084, Hopkirk wrote:Also @Dino: Fire/Ser/NM are never under any pressure. Sheep is free to say what he likes about them since nobody is paying attention to those slots given the much bigger issues going on. What he does say is minor at best.