Mafiascum.net

I think this is dgb trying to overinflate his scumminess and force this wagon. He's at l-2, there's several irl days left in the phase, i'm not following why we're at the point where he needs to claim

In post 3091, Cabd wrote:Yeah Ffery think you can stay awake this evening. Like ten my time or so?

I slept most of the day, so probably! dnd tonight, wrapping up around 10:30 or so your time.

In post 3096, borkjerfkin wrote:

In post 3037, Prism wrote:Anyway, thanks for answering those. Not going to act like I'm the biggest fan of the answers but I appreciate it

...is it gonna be worth it to ask why you think that

3031 is an accurate analysis but takes no stance. 3032 is plausible and addresses why you haven't come into the day pushing my slot but isn't like particularly insightful.

They're fine posts but not beacons of town light. You came in a bit aggressive on Pooky early in the day and had an awkward engagement. I'm concerned about you standing pat for the most part and not engaging more directly with that read on me before I asked.

"takes a pretty neutral stance" might be a better description for 3031, which is different than no stance at all.

In post 3102, Prism wrote:They're fine posts but not beacons of town light.

man if that isn't just a moving of the goalposts i don't know what is

p-edit: that's pretty much how i feel on the ben slot right now

In post 3100, skitter30 wrote:I think this is dgb trying to overinflate his scumminess and force this wagon. He's at l-2, there's several irl days left in the phase, i'm not following why we're at the point where he needs to claim

Correct.

Somebody has to shake up the game's lurkdom.

He last posted Dec 9. Maybe we'll get a replacement? We'll see then.

In post 3102, Prism wrote:You came in a bit aggressive on Pooky early in the day and had an awkward engagement.

pooky came in saying that he never busses d1 (and is therefore town)

I'm not taking that at face value, since, if he were scum, you know, he'd argue the same, yeah?

In post 3104, borkjerfkin wrote:man if that isn't just a moving of the goalposts i don't know what is

You asked why I wasn't the biggest fan of the posts. How I feel in reaction to them is very up to me.

They addressed my questions in plausible but not particularly persuasive ways. I didn't hate them but what I took from them was that I was right to be concerned.

In post 3105, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 3100, skitter30 wrote:I think this is dgb trying to overinflate his scumminess and force this wagon. He's at l-2, there's several irl days left in the phase, i'm not following why we're at the point where he needs to claim

Correct.

Somebody has to shake up the game's lurkdom.

He last posted Dec 9. Maybe we'll get a replacement? We'll see then.

ok but i'm saying the way you're going abt it is scummy to me

In post 3102, Prism wrote:I'm concerned about you standing pat for the most part and not engaging more directly with that read on me before I asked.

noted

In post 3107, Prism wrote:

In post 3104, borkjerfkin wrote:man if that isn't just a moving of the goalposts i don't know what is

You asked why I wasn't the biggest fan of the posts. How I feel in reaction to them is very up to me.

They addressed my questions in plausible but not particularly persuasive ways. I didn't hate them but what I took from them was that I was right to be concerned.

this just quite frankly reads as nonsense

In post 3110, borkjerfkin wrote:this just quite frankly reads as nonsense

Can you be more specific?

At the risk of strawmanning, it feels like you're expecting that if I accept an explanation as reasonable/plausible that I have to accept you as town or your response as likely true. Understanding why you would have a reaction as town does not mean that I have to view it as the most likely option.

In post 3106, borkjerfkin wrote:pooky came in saying that he never busses d1 (and is therefore town)

I'm not taking that at face value, since, if he were scum, you know, he'd argue the same, yeah?

if i were scum syr never replaces out and i fight cabd to the death on d1 for him

pooky can i interest u in voting dgb?

I appreciated you answering the questions but like, you don't become town to me for answering reasonably. We answer things reasonably all the time as scum.

If by "moving the goalposts" you think there's a conflict between my original phrase of "not the biggest fan" and later "They were fine posts but not beacons of town light", the latter is referring to the fact that while there was nothing blatantly wrong with them, they reinforced the concerns that led me to ask to begin with.

On a scale of 1-5 where 1 is hate, 5 is love, I'd give the posts a 2.

it feels like you're expecting that if I accept an explanation as reasonable/plausible that I have to accept you as town or your response as likely true.

no it just means, as usual, i have no fucking idea what you're trying to say

In post 3107, Prism wrote:They addressed my questions in plausible but not particularly persuasive ways. I didn't hate them but what I took from them was that I was right to be concerned.

you didn't advertise any particular goal or trajectory here, so when you go "yeah that's plausible but i'm not convinced" or that you're "not the biggest fan" i have no idea what you mean, and i inferred from your response that you thought my answers were scummy and wanted to drill down into why you think that

In post 3114, Prism wrote:you don't become town to me for answering reasonably

who the fuck indicated i was suggesting this

jesus fucking christ

In post 3113, skitter30 wrote:pooky can i interest u in voting dgb?

God forbid someone wouldn't let the lurkers get away with lurking.

you're trying to argue that he's scum for lurking tho, that's a siginficant part of why i take issue with this

In post 3114, Prism wrote:On a scale of 1-5 where 1 is hate, 5 is love, I'd give the posts a 2.

fuck off lol. they were reasonable but they don't convince me you're town so actually they were bad

VOTE: prism

In post 3117, borkjerfkin wrote:jesus fucking christ

Why so mad? Talk to me.

noooooo can we not distracted by the prism/bork sidebar plz

Right, well, I'm done with this in any case, time to play Sonic Adventure.

In post 3119, skitter30 wrote:you're trying to argue that he's scum for lurking tho, that's a siginficant part of why i take issue with this

When he shows up, it's to get mad at people voting him, that's when my scumdar vibrates.