Mafiascum.net

In post 3092, LicketyQuickety wrote:I mean, Cheeky might as well full claim at this point...

Nope.

In post 3099, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 3096, LicketyQuickety wrote:If DGB didn't perform a NA and is Scum then it confirms Shrek, Cheeky, and Mega being Town.

Cheeky and Mega can't both be town, dude.

Why not?

In post 3096, LicketyQuickety wrote:If DGB didn't perform a NA and is Scum then it confirms Shrek, Cheeky, and Mega being Town.

I am town and I targeted Shrek.

In post 3100, CheekyTeeky wrote:

In post 3092, LicketyQuickety wrote:I mean, Cheeky might as well full claim at this point...

Nope.

I think you're fake.

Your first posts were calling me DISLOYAL which I know is a crock.

You keep changing like a good little scum.

In post 3101, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 3099, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 3096, LicketyQuickety wrote:If DGB didn't perform a NA and is Scum then it confirms Shrek, Cheeky, and Mega being Town.

Cheeky and Mega can't both be town, dude.

Why not?

There is no sequence of night actions where Cheeky visits DGB and Cheeky gets no result where mega can also see this happen, unless cheeky has an unclaimed modifier like loyal/disloyal/simple/etc. @Cheeky you don't have any modifier like that, correct?

Here's my thought process... Just going to say what I'm thinking.

I think DGB is Neighborizer, but I don't think they are loyal or disloyal. I'm also unsure if they are X-shot or not.

In the case DGB is Scum who did not use a NA, then Cheeky's no result, Shreks no result, and Mega seeing both Cheeky and Shrek visited DGB makes perfect sense.

Without knowing Cheeky's role, we don't know if one of Cheeky or Shrek is Scum in the case of Town!DGB since either of them could have rolestopped DGB.

OTOH, Cheeky could be just doing a gambit and Mega is just Scum here. If that's the case then we lynch Mega. If Cheeky actually did visit DGG then I'd like to know what they got out of Gamma on N1. It makes sense that Cheeky visited Gamma N1 so that makes me less inclined that Cheeky is just pulling a gambit. So we are back to the original point that if DGB didn't do a NA then it confirms all of Mega, Shrek, and Cheeky.

In post 3104, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 3101, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 3099, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 3096, LicketyQuickety wrote:If DGB didn't perform a NA and is Scum then it confirms Shrek, Cheeky, and Mega being Town.

Cheeky and Mega can't both be town, dude.

Why not?

There is no sequence of night actions where Cheeky visits DGB and Cheeky gets no result where mega can also see this happen, unless cheeky has an unclaimed modifier like loyal/disloyal/simple/etc. @Cheeky you don't have any modifier like that, correct?

So what does that mean if DGB didn't even do a NA? How does that tie into this?

In post 3104, Dwlee99 wrote:@Cheeky you don't have any modifier like that, correct?

I have no modifier like those.

In post 3106, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 3104, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 3101, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 3099, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 3096, LicketyQuickety wrote:If DGB didn't perform a NA and is Scum then it confirms Shrek, Cheeky, and Mega being Town.

Cheeky and Mega can't both be town, dude.

Why not?

There is no sequence of night actions where Cheeky visits DGB and Cheeky gets no result where mega can also see this happen, unless cheeky has an unclaimed modifier like loyal/disloyal/simple/etc. @Cheeky you don't have any modifier like that, correct?

So what does that mean if DGB didn't even do a NA? How does that tie into this?

Nothing. Because this is all about cheeky getting no result and mega seeing the action that gave no result.

I just feel like cheeky was blocked. DGB targeted shrek and then mega just lied. Someone tell me why this didn't happen?

In post 3109, Nero Cain wrote:I just feel like cheeky was blocked. DGB targeted shrek and then mega just lied. Someone tell me why this didn't happen?

I agree unless scum have a roleblocker.

In post 3103, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 3100, CheekyTeeky wrote:

In post 3092, LicketyQuickety wrote:I mean, Cheeky might as well full claim at this point...

Nope.

I think you're fake.

Your first posts were calling me DISLOYAL which I know is a crock.

You keep changing like a good little scum.

In post 3108, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 3106, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 3104, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 3101, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 3099, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 3096, LicketyQuickety wrote:If DGB didn't perform a NA and is Scum then it confirms Shrek, Cheeky, and Mega being Town.

Cheeky and Mega can't both be town, dude.

Why not?

There is no sequence of night actions where Cheeky visits DGB and Cheeky gets no result where mega can also see this happen, unless cheeky has an unclaimed modifier like loyal/disloyal/simple/etc. @Cheeky you don't have any modifier like that, correct?

So what does that mean if DGB didn't even do a NA? How does that tie into this?

Nothing. Because this is all about cheeky getting no result and mega seeing the action that gave no result.

We have no idea what Cheeky getting "no result" even means without their claim.

In post 3105, LicketyQuickety wrote:In the case DGB is Scum who did not use a NA, then Cheeky's no result, Shreks no result, and Mega seeing both Cheeky and Shrek visited DGB makes perfect sense.

Without knowing Cheeky's role, we don't know if one of Cheeky or Shrek is Scum in the case of Town!DGB since either of them could have rolestopped DGB.

Cheeky's role doesn't sound like it depends on whether or not DGB performed a night action. If it does, then a roleblock on DGB would give Cheeky a no result pm which is explicitly what cheeky is saying is NOT possible. I think Cheeky's role gets a result regardless of DGB performing a night action, otherwise why would cheeky say DGB is scum/disloyal/ascetic on a failed or no action?

Or actually, nvm yea I think that's just how it works out. Misread

In post 3113, Dragon of the West wrote:

In post 3105, LicketyQuickety wrote:In the case DGB is Scum who did not use a NA, then Cheeky's no result, Shreks no result, and Mega seeing both Cheeky and Shrek visited DGB makes perfect sense.

Without knowing Cheeky's role, we don't know if one of Cheeky or Shrek is Scum in the case of Town!DGB since either of them could have rolestopped DGB.

Cheeky's role doesn't sound like it depends on whether or not DGB performed a night action. If it does, then a roleblock on DGB would give Cheeky a no result pm which is explicitly what cheeky is saying is NOT possible. I think Cheeky's role gets a result regardless of DGB performing a night action, otherwise why would cheeky say DGB is scum/disloyal/ascetic on a failed or no action?

We don't know any of that without Cheeky's claim.

In post 3100, CheekyTeeky wrote:

In post 3092, LicketyQuickety wrote:I mean, Cheeky might as well full claim at this point...

Nope.

In post 3106, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 3104, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 3101, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 3099, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 3096, LicketyQuickety wrote:If DGB didn't perform a NA and is Scum then it confirms Shrek, Cheeky, and Mega being Town.

Cheeky and Mega can't both be town, dude.

Why not?

There is no sequence of night actions where Cheeky visits DGB and Cheeky gets no result where mega can also see this happen, unless cheeky has an unclaimed modifier like loyal/disloyal/simple/etc. @Cheeky you don't have any modifier like that, correct?

So what does that mean if DGB didn't even do a NA? How does that tie into this?

Scum MVP right here.

In post 3112, LicketyQuickety wrote:We have no idea what Cheeky getting "no result" even means without their claim.

Unless it is a modifier we know it is incompatible with Mega's claim.

I will claim tomorrow if I'm still here or you will find out in the morning. There's no need to make this any more impotent.

In post 3117, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 3112, LicketyQuickety wrote:We have no idea what Cheeky getting "no result" even means without their claim.

Unless it is a modifier we know it is incompatible with Mega's claim.

Unless Cheeky is Scum Rolestopper. Unlikely, but still possible. Or Cheeky could be RB but that is even more far fetched.

dude cheeky was blocked

In post 3117, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 3112, LicketyQuickety wrote:We have no idea what Cheeky getting "no result" even means without their claim.

Unless it is a modifier we know it is incompatible with Mega's claim.

Whi is lying between Cheeky and MEGA?

I also need MEGA's N1 target.

In post 3119, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 3117, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 3112, LicketyQuickety wrote:We have no idea what Cheeky getting "no result" even means without their claim.

Unless it is a modifier we know it is incompatible with Mega's claim.

Unless Cheeky is Scum Rolestopper. Unlikely, but still possible. Or Cheeky could be RB but that is even more far fetched.

No... because if Cheeky was a rolestopper then mega would get no result

In post 3120, Nero Cain wrote:dude cheeky was blocked

Cheeky never claimed to be RB'd.

Cheeky claimed i was disloyal, then ascetic.

In post 3121, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 3117, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 3112, LicketyQuickety wrote:We have no idea what Cheeky getting "no result" even means without their claim.

Unless it is a modifier we know it is incompatible with Mega's claim.

Whi is lying between Cheeky and MEGA?

I also need MEGA's N1 target.

Mega didn't have a N1. They were Even Night 2-shot.