Mafiascum.net

Please answer the second part of my question too.

I dunno, when the verbal diarrhea started.

In post 3115, Voidedmafia wrote:No, n/a, n/a, $10 on FRC, $5 on bulletproof, $100 to one of pie and garuda, and I reconfirm I transferred to Pere N2

ugh wtf
I went to go verify you nominated FRC back when everyone was posting their top abilities to advertise (since afaik I was the only one who wanted FRC) and I just realized you never even claimed the top 5 abilities you'd want to advertise. can you explain why not plz?

uwop I don't give a shit how bad my vote is get the hell off me and make a good vote. or are you attacking me because you're zmuffin's buddy

In post 3127, pieguyn wrote:

In post 3115, Voidedmafia wrote:No, n/a, n/a, $10 on FRC, $5 on bulletproof, $100 to one of pie and garuda, and I reconfirm I transferred to Pere N2

ugh wtf
I went to go verify you nominated FRC back when everyone was posting their top abilities to advertise (since afaik I was the only one who wanted FRC) and I just realized you never even claimed the top 5 abilities you'd want to advertise. can you explain why not plz?

uwop I don't give a shit how bad my vote is get the hell off me and make a good vote. or are you attacking me because you're zmuffin's buddy

This last line is so filled with :goodposting:, like so much.

EBWOP: Nero, can I borrow that chainsaw gif. We're going to need it.

In post 3126, Espeonage wrote:I dunno, when the verbal diarrhea started.

That's definitely before 2980 then. So you're saying you had a townread on Seanald and were telling people to not bother reading the thread and to just vote for him?

In post 3127, pieguyn wrote:uwop I don't give a shit how bad my vote is get the hell off me and make a good vote. or are you attacking me because you're zmuffin's buddy

what

MORPH.

COME BACK TO LIFE, PLEASE.

*sobs*

I misread what you were asking.

2995 is about where morph got scummy, which is what I was answering, however that wasn't the question as I have now realised.

As for your actual question, 3006?

LB (3119) while its true that an ending like M1 is now impossible since its removed at 10p, but it's still a dangerous ability for them to have a chance at picking up if there isn't anything more important, which is why I preferred to use it before my death, and why I activated it last night.

UD (3122): why?

Esp (2124): what are you talking about, exactly? Quotes and/or links, plz.

Pedit: that's not gonna bring them back.

I assume you have more braincells than Seanald. Please justify your actions.

In post 3128, Espeonage wrote:

In post 3127, pieguyn wrote:

In post 3115, Voidedmafia wrote:No, n/a, n/a, $10 on FRC, $5 on bulletproof, $100 to one of pie and garuda, and I reconfirm I transferred to Pere N2

ugh wtf
I went to go verify you nominated FRC back when everyone was posting their top abilities to advertise (since afaik I was the only one who wanted FRC) and I just realized you never even claimed the top 5 abilities you'd want to advertise. can you explain why not plz?

uwop I don't give a shit how bad my vote is get the hell off me and make a good vote. or are you attacking me because you're zmuffin's buddy

This last line is so filled with :goodposting:, like so much.

Sorry to be mean, but this post is not :goodposting:.

In post 3127, pieguyn wrote:

In post 3115, Voidedmafia wrote:No, n/a, n/a, $10 on FRC, $5 on bulletproof, $100 to one of pie and garuda, and I reconfirm I transferred to Pere N2

ugh wtf
I went to go verify you nominated FRC back when everyone was posting their top abilities to advertise (since afaik I was the only one who wanted FRC) and I just realized you never even claimed the top 5 abilities you'd want to advertise. can you explain why not plz?

My choices were not chosen based on my nomination d1, and I don't see why I should necessarily be beholden to that choice now (especially since I doubled with garuda <_<).

And I simply did not. Why are my advertisement choices that concerning? Are you suggesting I should've put all of my money to you/garuda instead of doing part of that as well as helping in the advert dept.?

In post 3131, uʍop ǝpısdn wrote:

In post 3127, pieguyn wrote:uwop I don't give a shit how bad my vote is get the hell off me and make a good vote. or are you attacking me because you're zmuffin's buddy

what

So why'd you vote pie, then?

Mina, he's talking specifically talking about the line to ud, not the post as a whole.

In post 3131, uʍop ǝpısdn wrote:

In post 3127, pieguyn wrote:uwop I don't give a shit how bad my vote is get the hell off me and make a good vote. or are you attacking me because you're zmuffin's buddy

what

your post where you voted me implies you think my vote on zmuffin is bad

you must have missed the part where I outright said that I wanted to do something that wasn't instawagoning voided. thus, I chose to vote zmuffin. I don't give a shit how half-assed that vote really is, and I'm well aware it is considering the whole vote came from one thing that happened to ping me really hard. but it'd be even worse if the only thing that happened was an instalynch on D4 and we got no new information at all besides voided's flip. we already got smth in the form of Espeonage joining the wagon and now this

ever since people started being paranoid there was scum inside the townblock, you're trying to take advantage of it by implying I'm scum. and your reasons for voting me are pretty much the easiest possible reasons to come up with and show a lack of actual scumhunting. you haven't tried to question me or make an actual push on me. as it is, you've provided no actual reasoning besides bad posting (I've already explained my bad posting was due to me being tired as fuck when I made those posts), and have just been quoting posts I've made and going "ugh", "this is bad", etc. without saying anything specific about any of it.

tl;dr: your whole push on me is opportunistic as fuck. this screams like scum lining up a mislynch

I like pie's post above on a pretty gut level. A lot deeper than I usually attribute to gut on myself or others.

BBMolla I love how you bid a lot on everything but wage freeze

~Sakura Hana

In post 3138, Voidedmafia wrote:Mina, he's talking specifically talking about the line to ud, not the post as a whole.

Actually, I meant that Espeonage's post wasn't being goodposting. The line he quoted is silly and OMGUS-y. "Oh, you're voting me because of that post? Try again. Or are you Muffin's buddy?" I mean, given that I also thought pie's Muffin vote was for really superficial reasoning (although pie's point about not wanting to vote-park on Voided is valid), I thought upside down's vote came in a really natural place. But then Espeonage just compounds the stupidity and hyperbole. Omigod, you voted someone and criticized their vote on another player. This makes you their scumbuddy! Chainsaw! More buzzwords!

And what do you mean by "gut level," Voided? That you get a good gut feeling about pie's post? That you've noticed the same thing as pieguyn about upside down's treatment of them this game?

(pieguyn's follow-up post and upside down vote have much more than the Muffin vote did, in that it reminds me of a Pyro-style persecuted townie, although I don't like pie going, "Oh, you can't call my posting bad because I was !" The actual REASONING has holes, but I haven't been following pie's interactions with ud closely this game and would prefer to hear upside down defend themselves.)

In post 3142, Lost Butterfly wrote:but I haven't been following pie's interactions with ud closely this game and would prefer to hear upside down defend themselves.)

he's basically quoted 7 or 8 posts I've made and had nothing to say besides "ugh", "how did I get a townread on you again", etc.

that's all there is

It just really rang in me as a townish accusation against ud and, as you said, a good gut feelinng. If I think on it, I do dimly recall what pie's talking about and based on that I agree, but that wasn't a factor. I don't have the ability to really check right now, but if it's true then I definitely am confident in that feeling and in following pie with my vote.

And I see re Esp. I thought you meant pie's post.

In post 3143, pieguyn wrote:

In post 3142, Lost Butterfly wrote:but I haven't been following pie's interactions with ud closely this game and would prefer to hear upside down defend themselves.)

he's basically quoted 7 or 8 posts I've made and had nothing to say besides "ugh", "how did I get a townread on you again", etc.

that's all there is

I recall such one-bit replies from ud, and that some were at you, but that sounds generally accurate.

Doing some re-analysis because my reads suck.

pieguy is slimy as fuck.

Just from a quick scroll through your stuff from yesterday:
There was the trying to make Mhork bad for mediuming Pyro http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 1#p5427081
"all the apethetic people are scum!" http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 9#p5432449
The biggest scumtell I've ever seen: "this argument is town v scum, but I don't know which is which!" http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 2#p5432442 http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 9#p5436869 http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 3#p5445253

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 6#p5460376 was just the straw that broke the camel's back. Your entrance looked pretty town on the surface, but it's all been downhill from there. I didn't vote you for your vote on muffinman, and I think it's pretty bad to assume that's the bit of the post I disliked - I should have cut the vote out of the post I quoted, because I the bit I voted you for was your shitty reasoning for believing Seanald was scum and refusing to believe other people can have different opinions than you. It's like you were expecting muffin to come in today seeking out those who pushed Seanald the hardest and wanted to preemptively discredit him, because hey the same thing almost worked on ProHawk day 2!

Did you ever answer that question about where I was calling someone else scum for posting fluff?

In post 3143, pieguyn wrote:

In post 3142, Lost Butterfly wrote:but I haven't been following pie's interactions with ud closely this game and would prefer to hear upside down defend themselves.)

he's basically quoted 7 or 8 posts I've made and had nothing to say besides "ugh", "how did I get a townread on you again", etc.

that's all there is

I don't know if you've been reading the whole thread or not, but you should have probably noticed I tend to do that anyway.

Please quote the "7 or 8 posts" where all I said to you was "ugh" or similar. I fear you may be exaggerating a lot with this statement.

In post 3141, Harakiri wrote:BBMolla I love how you bid a lot on everything but wage freeze

~Sakura Hana

Did you win it again?