Mafiascum.net

In post 3113, unwnd wrote:If Annie wanted to be a demon (implying our theory on scum self-sharding is true), then there would be no need to get shards. Shard voting is the balance for scum having their own.

I don't have this theory though. @_@.
I have possible explanations.
We know that unless scum has additional abilities not categorized under a night action that they can't hand out shards and kill in the same night.

Rhea initially assumed that Medea tried to kill them at night and that, *that* was why there was no kill that night.
I pointed out the assumption she was making that the scum didn't hand out shards instead. Or at least I thought she was making that assumption.

I do not see a reason to half-ass a shard. Either we want a powered up town demon or we don't. There should not be a middle ground. Because it just gives scum control over who is and isn't demonified based on their abilities.
This makes sense right?

-Bell

In post 3124, Snarky Fishes wrote:

In post 3121, Dunnstral wrote:Hey snarky fishes. Why does it make sense for Medea to be a scum doctor that self-roleblocks if targeted?

I don't know that it does make sense. But why wouldn't it?

It's an obviously town role that doesn't benefit the scum team at all, except if they coincidentally target me

- Scum can probably self-distribute shards. They chose to do this last night. Does this imply that they self-distributed and opted to not kill? I don't believe so.
- Medea claimed a demon on D1. I am running on a theory (perhaps others) that there was 1 town demon and 1 scum demon present on D1.
- If scum could self-distribute and make them all demons by D2 then based on the original wincon they could win by like D3. I believe the original count was something like 6 or 7. They coiuld be halfway to their goal.
- We're at medium now, this means more than 2. We can lowball it as 3 and imply one of the scum converted to a demon. Nobody has outright claimed they're a demon right now.

More importantly, why is there no stopping and reconsidering from the thread at large with this new info?

Lld, did you become a demon?

In post 3123, unwnd wrote:Also I can't reveal something else about my role because I'm certain if I do it plays right into scum

I asked FF in discord if medea ever true claimed as scum before.

We're processing a lot of different claims and information right now.

-Bell.

Just a reminder that Pooky replying snarkily to suspicion directed at him does not absolve any of his horrendously scummy behavior last Day and we should not just continue to overlook him because he has cute quips lined up in response to valid allegations.

I will continue to repeat this until he is limmed.

In post 3126, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 3124, Snarky Fishes wrote:

In post 3121, Dunnstral wrote:Hey snarky fishes. Why does it make sense for Medea to be a scum doctor that self-roleblocks if targeted?

I don't know that it does make sense. But why wouldn't it?

It's an obviously town role that doesn't benefit the scum team at all, except if they coincidentally target me

I'm not scumreading medea.

I think you're reacting to my reply to notsci?

My point was that his viewpoint that scum would start with a demon, means that medea is scum given we were at on shards.

I was pointing out the implication of that viewpoint, and not saying I think medea is scum.

In post 3129, Dunnstral wrote:Lld, did you become a demon?

In post 3128, Dunnstral wrote:More importantly, why is there no stopping and reconsidering from the thread at large with this new info?

Okay, why do you think there has been no reconsideration, weighing or thinking from us?
What exactly do you think we're posting about?

-Bell

In post 3126, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 3124, Snarky Fishes wrote:

In post 3121, Dunnstral wrote:Hey snarky fishes. Why does it make sense for Medea to be a scum doctor that self-roleblocks if targeted?

I don't know that it does make sense. But why wouldn't it?

It's an obviously town role that doesn't benefit the scum team at all, except if they coincidentally target me

or if there's a vig

In post 3127, unwnd wrote:- Scum can probably self-distribute shards. They chose to do this last night. Does this imply that they self-distributed and opted to not kill? I don't believe so.

wait, what?

In post 3128, Dunnstral wrote:More importantly, why is there no stopping and reconsidering from the thread at large with this new info?

because i don't understand what's going on

In post 3131, Spiffeh wrote:Just a reminder that Pooky replying snarkily to suspicion directed at him does not absolve any of his horrendously scummy behavior last Day and we should not just continue to overlook him because he has cute quips lined up in response to valid allegations.

I will continue to repeat this until he is limmed.

we're busy, you can bus later ;3

In post 3135, Here There Be Dragons wrote:wait, what?

What part don't you understand?

In post 3135, Here There Be Dragons wrote:wait, what?

read the sample scum role pm?

you said they self distributed and also didn't self distribute?

In post 3139, Here There Be Dragons wrote:you said they self distributed and also didn't self distribute?

I implied I believe they did both. Borkie specifically implied that scum can multi-task.

In post 3134, Snarky Fishes wrote:

In post 3128, Dunnstral wrote:More importantly, why is there no stopping and reconsidering from the thread at large with this new info?

Okay, why do you think there has been no reconsideration, weighing or thinking from us?
What exactly do you think we're posting about?

-Bell

You seem to be arguing about whether unwnd used his role optimally or not, but it's unclear if you think he is lying

Like, holy shit, I just went after Unwnd for not handing a shard out to Annie.
FF was asking questions of LLD about their claim,
I asked a questin in hydra about Medea.
I'm bugging Manatee about their change in tone.

Plus some traditional pings here and there. we've been noting.
So why do you think we aren't reacting to roles?



-Bell

In post 3140, unwnd wrote:

In post 3139, Here There Be Dragons wrote:you said they self distributed and also didn't self distribute?

I implied I believe they did both. Borkie specifically implied that scum can multi-task.

i thought the scum sample role pm said they had to choose one

unless multitasking includes that

hm okay

A sample Role PM is just that

An sample. Even then, factional kill is separate. I think a member can choose to kill and one of them can self-distribute with the multitask clause in play

Aw Ceph pretending he thinks I’m scum here when he had the second worst vote on the Titus wagon that’s so cute!!

Also you all did Titus dirty and should feel bad about yourselves

ok i see what you're saying on that front then.

Yeah yeah you get it now Ceph thanks

Let the record state all this talk is just understanding mechanics

Right now I'm thinking that the reason Medea did not get a counterclaim is because scum had no incentive to claim

I really feel like town would've? I'm starting to believe in Dunnstral's world

Here There Be Dragons wrote:unless multitasking includes that

hm okay

It looks like a factional ability to me, given the way it's worded.

I suppose it's not impossible that scum also have a non-factional shard distributor ability, but that seems pretty broken, even with the alternate wincon modification that happened.


No reply to my posts about the Low shardcount day 1?