Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2021 12:14 pm
In post 2871, MegAzumarill wrote:Results:
CheekyTeeky and Shrek visited DrippingGoofball last night.
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
In post 2871, MegAzumarill wrote:Results:
CheekyTeeky and Shrek visited DrippingGoofball last night.
Well, what does NAR say about this?In post 3122, Dwlee99 wrote:No... because if Cheeky was a rolestopper then mega would get no resultIn post 3119, LicketyQuickety wrote:Unless Cheeky is Scum Rolestopper. Unlikely, but still possible. Or Cheeky could be RB but that is even more far fetched.In post 3117, Dwlee99 wrote:Unless it is a modifier we know it is incompatible with Mega's claim.In post 3112, LicketyQuickety wrote:We have no idea what Cheeky getting "no result" even means without their claim.
What I just told you. That unless cheeky has a modifier that can cause no result, one of her and mega is lying.In post 3126, LicketyQuickety wrote:Well, what does NAR say about this?In post 3122, Dwlee99 wrote:No... because if Cheeky was a rolestopper then mega would get no resultIn post 3119, LicketyQuickety wrote:Unless Cheeky is Scum Rolestopper. Unlikely, but still possible. Or Cheeky could be RB but that is even more far fetched.In post 3117, Dwlee99 wrote:Unless it is a modifier we know it is incompatible with Mega's claim.In post 3112, LicketyQuickety wrote:We have no idea what Cheeky getting "no result" even means without their claim.
In case of emergency breakdown of the Golden Rule
If there is really no other option, the traditional recommendation of Natural Action Resolution is to pick whichever of the conflicting actions comes first on the following list, and resolve it first:
Copy
Hide
Bus Drive
Block
Redirect
Protect
Miscellaneous
Kill
Recruit
Inspect
Do not use this list unless actions are actually in conflict; that is, that both affect each other.
If only one of the actions affects another, resolve that one first, regardless of the positions on the list.
dgb may have actually targeted me but it didnt show up thenTemporalLich wrote:Roleblocked actions don't show up for action investigativesIn post 2727, Shrek wrote:@Mod if a player is RBed, will it show up as them having 'no action' on the tracker report?
/confirm no modifier that would cause my role to fail.In post 3130, Dwlee99 wrote:Cheeky can you CONFIRM you don't have a modifier that could cause this?