Mafiascum.net

In post 3129, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:@ looker
I think that the only way to answer that is to flip Auro.... I am okay with that but honestly, I would rather flip Titus atm

In post 3148, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:UNVOTE:

How has your view changed. Is titus no longer your prefered lynch?

You unvoted him so do you no longer think he is scum. As at the point of your unvote you were infact the only vote on titus. Is there a reason you simply unvoted as normaly the only time someone unvotes is when they no longer think that players is scum or want to prevent teh day ending early.

Is teh reason of your unvote one of them or do you scum read someone else more now. And if so who is it?

In post 3149, Looker wrote:

In post 3141, Auro wrote:I've read bits of a few ISOs.

Whose?

In post 3142, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:So we are just going to ignore Titus and that slot weird behavior and Titus urking..... okay


@ Looker
um what does my age has to do with anything?

• Maybe they're distracted by "something shiny"?
  
• I feel your persona is manufactured. Younger people elicit sympathy, and I question whether it's your intention to exploit that. Grammatical errors, faulty reasoning, etc.

I am ADD. I handle it by making fun of myself. Coping mechanism. I dont proofread my text so I tend to have grammatical and spelling mistakes. Grammatic mistakes etc has nothing to do with manipulation. This kind feels like a stretch Can you show me one place where I was trying to exploit emotions. I think you are totally misreading me. This being a game of deception this is not an uncommon thing

In post 3148, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:UNVOTE:

That's what you do best.

---

Trying to game solve.... With new info thoughts on things can change.

• I'm trying to reconcile being told to change my vote because I'm dumb by someone fresh off of a mislynch. I haven't figured out whether I should be insulted or ruthful.

Sorry but I take this quote personally. I never once called you dumb! I called myself dumb. I often imply self-attacking humor but I never ever attack a person personally. Say what you will about my gameplay fine but dont ever insult my character. I go out out of my way no matter what alignment I have to hold up the spirit of the game Yes you very much have hit a nerve!!!!

Spoiler:

auro (3)

~ flavor leaf, sausasaurusrex, insomnia

pine (1)

~ bob3141

sausasaurusrex (1)

~ titus

fuzzylogic99 (2)

~looker, auro

not voting (2) ~ pine, thefuzzylogic99
with 9 alive, it takes 5 to lynch
S {TFL | pine | auro | sausa | bob | insom | titus | flavor leaf} T

In post 3150, bob3141 wrote:

In post 3129, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:@ looker
I think that the only way to answer that is to flip Auro.... I am okay with that but honestly, I would rather flip Titus atm

In post 3148, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:UNVOTE:

How has your view changed. Is titus no longer your prefered lynch?

You unvoted him so do you no longer think he is scum. As at the point of your unvote you were infact the only vote on titus. Is there a reason you simply unvoted as normaly the only time someone unvotes is when they no longer think that players is scum or want to prevent teh day ending early.

Is teh reason of your unvote one of them or do you scum read someone else more now. And if so who is it?

That makes more sense. I wasn't accusing you of manipulation outright, but that's why I was asking your age. I thought you were either really young or spoke English as a second language.

The 'being called dumb' wasn't directed at you; they know who they are. I don't like insulting people. I still think you're mafia, though.

In post 3147, insomnia wrote:

In post 3143, Auro wrote:I gave you an obvious explanation for Titus' behavior. Why have you ignored that?

If you are still in the phase of inquiry, why have you placed down a vote?

Game's moving too slow; looking at what wagons can be built is part of scumhunting engagement and not just questions, etc.

Being "dumb" isn't a towntell, I've been pushed for very dumb logic before from otherwise competent slots which I townread because it seemed sincere enough - nah, it was scum.

In post 3145, insomnia wrote:That's a red flag auro...You said we lynch in my PoE. What changed?

1. Your reasons for townreading TFL aren't strong enough, versus his scummy play
2. I played the game, was always liable to change my reads from your PoE
3. I've mentioned that both Pine and TFL have scum equity; TFL is a more achievable lynch
4. Pine's post unvoting me after FL's "threat" seems weird coming from scum who'd know I'm town and that I can shift off momentum

This isn't a "red flag".

Down to lynch Pine tbh

@Insomnia - can we go there? Auro’s at least playing. I don’t think he should ever end game here, but him posting can help us figure out the game anyways

-

-

-

-

I'm not voting in your POE; I'm voting Fuzzy.

In post 3142, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:So we are just going to ignore Titus and that slot weird behavior and Titus urking..... okay


@ Looker
um what does my age has to do with anything?

how does titus factor into your day one vca analysis. As although nomI didnt vote nom he did declare intent to hammer nom when nom was at l-3 or l-2. Do you think nomI declaration wasnt genuine hence teh reason for not hammering. Or that looker simply hammered before he could.

In post 3151, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:

In post 3149, Looker wrote:

In post 3141, Auro wrote:I've read bits of a few ISOs.

Whose?

In post 3142, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:So we are just going to ignore Titus and that slot weird behavior and Titus urking..... okay


@ Looker
um what does my age has to do with anything?

• Maybe they're distracted by "something shiny"?
  
• I feel your persona is manufactured. Younger people elicit sympathy, and I question whether it's your intention to exploit that. Grammatical errors, faulty reasoning, etc.

I am ADD. I handle it by making fun of myself. Coping mechanism. I dont proofread my text so I tend to have grammatical and spelling mistakes. Grammatic mistakes etc has nothing to do with manipulation. This kind feels like a stretch Can you show me one place where I was trying to exploit emotions. I think you are totally misreading me. This being a game of deception this is not an uncommon thing

In post 3148, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:UNVOTE:

That's what you do best.

---

Trying to game solve.... With new info thoughts on things can change.

• I'm trying to reconcile being told to change my vote because I'm dumb by someone fresh off of a mislynch. I haven't figured out whether I should be insulted or ruthful.

Sorry but I take this quote personally. I never once called you dumb! I called myself dumb. I often imply self-attacking humor but I never ever attack a person personally. Say what you will about my gameplay fine but dont ever insult my character. I go out out of my way no matter what alignment I have to hold up the spirit of the game Yes you very much have hit a nerve!!!!

Spoiler:

auro (3)

~ flavor leaf, sausasaurusrex, insomnia

pine (1)

~ bob3141

sausasaurusrex (1)

~ titus

fuzzylogic99 (2)

~looker, auro

not voting (2) ~ pine, thefuzzylogic99
with 9 alive, it takes 5 to lynch
S {TFL | pine | auro | sausa | bob | insom | titus | flavor leaf} T

In post 3150, bob3141 wrote:

In post 3129, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:@ looker
I think that the only way to answer that is to flip Auro.... I am okay with that but honestly, I would rather flip Titus atm

In post 3148, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:UNVOTE:

How has your view changed. Is titus no longer your prefered lynch?

You unvoted him so do you no longer think he is scum. As at the point of your unvote you were infact the only vote on titus. Is there a reason you simply unvoted as normaly the only time someone unvotes is when they no longer think that players is scum or want to prevent teh day ending early.

Is teh reason of your unvote one of them or do you scum read someone else more now. And if so who is it?

The Titus slot still seems off but with additional info about her role, I want time to rethink if I am wrong.

Did you come to a conclusion?

(NOTE): This is a prod dodge. I’ll have a better, actually useful post in the morning.

In post 3162, bob3141 wrote:

In post 3142, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:So we are just going to ignore Titus and that slot weird behavior and Titus urking..... okay


@ Looker
um what does my age has to do with anything?

how does titus factor into your day one vca analysis. As although nomI didnt vote nom he did declare intent to hammer nom when nom was at l-3 or l-2. Do you think nomI declaration wasnt genuine hence teh reason for not hammering. Or that looker simply hammered before he could.

This doesn't help me but in VCA there's no such thing as "would have got on". VCA counts the votes that are there, minus cop guilties.

my thoughts on the Titus slot has nothing to do with VCA. for day one. i think it might be a rabbit hole but i want to dig deeper to see.
According to my VCA i should be lynching Auro , Isomania or Pine. . I am 99.9 percent sure there was a scum on either the Nom or Gjt wagon. I am betting on the Gjt wagon.

Fuzzy should've died a long time ago. Strange how the thread dies when that's mentioned. Overactive posters vanish and suddenly have nothing to say. Maybe you can get people to forget this game even exists?

p-edit: Damn it, tiger

What scum do you think were on the Ank lynch?

Just you or are you partners with insomnia or Flavor Leaf?

Just curious

In post 3165, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:my thoughts on the Titus slot has nothing to do with VCA. for day one. i think it might be a rabbit hole but i want to dig deeper to see.
According to my VCA i should be lynching Auro , Isomania or Pine. . I am 99.9 percent sure there was a scum on either the Nom or Gjt wagon. I am betting on the Gjt wagon.

So then in that list of three that titus is excluded. Which do you think is most likely to be scum and which the least

Thought I voted Fuzzy.

VOTE: Fuzzy

Bob, in the rare event today is TvT, tipsy Titus has her eyes set on you.