Mafiascum.net

In post 3147, skitter30 wrote:Anyone in particular i should be fn-ing?

In post 3149, Datisi wrote:i don't think it's clearing either, but with both donc expressing a storng townread of koba AND liluth expressing a locktown read of s_s...

In post 3147, skitter30 wrote:Anyone in particular i should be fn-ing?

Pedit: yeah that's what i was thinking but i settled on 'probably doesnt publicly ask a question that confirms his partner as scum'

In post 2845, dsjstr wrote:If TW actually softed then this obviously wouldn't be the team because there have been three PR claims which seems excessive?

In post 3156, skitter30 wrote:

In post 2845, dsjstr wrote:If TW actually softed then this obviously wouldn't be the team because there have been three PR claims which seems excessive?

Was the plan to be going after tw? Because otherwise he's shading pooky

In post 3160, Raven Branwen wrote:

In post 3156, skitter30 wrote:

In post 2845, dsjstr wrote:If TW actually softed then this obviously wouldn't be the team because there have been three PR claims which seems excessive?

Was the plan to be going after tw? Because otherwise he's shading pooky

Yeah you’re right, I misread.

In post 592, bugspray wrote:

In post 476, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Datisi

did you really think I wanted to evict Bugspray because he's been awol in 2 games with me and he was town in both those games but this game he's not awol? Like in what universe is that a good enough reason to evict someone?

my pronoun is they/them
VOTE: pooky

In post 615, bugspray wrote:

In post 541, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 529, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:like you literally read so many posts of me lying through my teeth in your game and being fustrated the town wouldn't get rid of me that now you think everything I post is scummy,

even when it's like a random vote on the first day the game is open.

That's why you made some giant convoluted push on me, it's some ego affirming thing so on the off-chance I do flip red you can say to your buddy aldus, see he wasn't that hard to get lynched.

i literally explained it

stop strawmanning

is he arguing with himself now?????

In post 626, bugspray wrote:

In post 529, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:like you literally

read so many posts of me lying through my teeth in your game and being fustrated the town wouldn't get rid of me that now you think everything I post is scummy,

even when it's like a random vote on the first day the game is open.

That's why you made some giant convoluted push on me, it's some ego affirming thing so on the off-chance I do flip red you can say to your buddy aldus, see he wasn't that hard to get lynched.

this is ltierally a self contradiction, pooky earlier said that datisi roots for scum as a mod

pedit my posts are getting eaten no

In post 628, bugspray wrote:

In post 595, Datisi wrote:@bugs, could you clarify if you're actually voting pooky for misgendering you?

it was the straw that broke the camel's back im just fucking done with reading his posts and wanted to i don't care if he's town or scum anymore because his mere presence is hurting town and even if he is some town role he's helping scum

In post 3127, Raven Branwen wrote:

In post 2845, dsjstr wrote:

In post 2839, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 2834, Raven Branwen wrote:Skitter is 100% confitown from this.

Skitter is not 100% conftown, she could be scum with Datisi

I had been putting skitter down as green :l but you're right

Well I was going to point out how we have been struggling to be able to associate two players but I noticed that Dats and Raven/bugs have been voting for the same people but never at the same time. That was what I noticed on the VC's

If TW actually softed then this obviously wouldn't be the team because there have been three PR claims which seems excessive?

Anyone have an opinion on this?

In post 3166, Datisi wrote:raven, pooky hardclaimed a role the mod said he wouldn't use in his setup. like what else do you want

In post 3168, Datisi wrote:i mean, i've literally been arguing for like a day now how they're s/s so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

In post 3135, Micc wrote:

In post 3115, Something_Smart wrote:

Micc, if you were to include a Vigilante role from Micro 941: Brass and Shrapnel, would you choose an individual player slot and then assign that player as either a True or Blank Vigilante depending on what the slot in that game was, or would you randomize it according to the normal generation procedure for Brass & Shrapnel? And, if you did assign it according to the game, would you then clarify to the player that they actually

did

know whether they were blank or not, even though the role PM implied that they did not?

I would consider the hidden information aspect of this role to be bastard enough that it would not have been used for the creation of my setup.

In post 3119, Datisi wrote:funnily enough, seeing pooky's scumplay in coalition is what made/makes me scumread him

In post 3171, Raven Branwen wrote:@Pooky, Micc is claiming you not being sure whether you are a blank vig or a real one as bastard and therefore false. I don’t understand why town!you lies about this?

After reread, I’m spiritually voting this.