Mafiascum.net

Furcolow wrote:i genuinely believe you are cult, and that you are acting to commandeer lynches

Then I must be really bad at it, or just really really subtle.

Considering I did everything I could yesterday to not get MoI lynched, and it turned out he wasn't cult (but was a murderer, good job people on that wagon).

And today I'm 8th on El Goosuki's wagon. 8th!

In other news, I was actually asking that question of El Goosuki.

Furcolow, 3148 wrote:xvart fake-stalk used to clarify insanities accrued from crafting multiple fetishes anyone?

- yes or no: do you think I am Cult? I am not going to kill you unless you say yes and promise to use your rez kit to prove my guilt.

AurorusVox wrote:I also agree that we

could

test xvart with the elab-o-plan on scummy candidates, BUT, can't scum mess with it by warding their buddies (i.e. if we come to a consensus about who to stalk)?

If they want to waste a slew of actions warding each other it's no sweat off my teeth, especially since they can't ward circle.

VP Baltar, 3176 wrote:

Vote: El Goosuki

I think you just double hammered (due to suicidal); but I guess it doesn't matter because the lynch count should reflect whether or not they had the lynch count or L-1 lynch count.

xvart.

That's L-2, unless I've miscounted.

I forgot that El Goosuki unvoted themselves and must have missed another one.

xvart.

EBWOP: According to the last vote count we have
7 - Wraith, Trilobite, SpyreX, hitorogoshi, Baby Spice, kunkstar7, Seacore, (El G jumped off her wagon so I've removed that)
And since then we've had AV and VP join.

So that's 9. How is that 12 xvart?

join us on the wagon xvart, it's comfy.

Not sure. I thought we were at L-1 when I was on the wagon, I got off, El Goosuki got on, then got off. I don't know.

preview edit: I probably will be getting on the wagon again, but I want to review Furpants' ISO first. And I want a clear answer from Furcolow.

xvart.

xvart, Furc has already indicated he thinks you're an investigator.

Seacore #3110 wrote:To do list
1) Get the graverob plan organised
2) Hito posts his thread and we make several posts underneath it in large bold
3) We tell xvart again not to murder furc
4) We lynch el goosuki.

Looks like 1-3 are covered. hitogoroshi posted his guide, and xvart has agreed not to murder Furcolow too. El Goosuki has 9 votes, L-2 with Suicidal.

The only error I spotted in the guide is that Nicodemus is missing from the players potentially at risk. For what it's worth he should be there, since he heard noise.

Time to call it a day. If anyone has any unfinished business today, hurry up.



That makes the next vote the hammer.

xvart wrote:Not sure. I thought we were at L-1 when I was on the wagon, I got off, El Goosuki got on, then got off. I don't know.

preview edit: I probably will be getting on the wagon again, but I want to review Furpants' ISO first. And I want a clear answer from Furcolow.

xvart.

To me this reeks of scum unwilling to bus a buddy.

hitogoroshi, 3183 wrote:xvart, Furc has already indicated he thinks you're an investigator.

Except in the sentence I posted he was throwing out a theory (that had already been spoken about ad nausem) that I was hiding an insanity; but then he said that maybe I was just stupid or something like that. I don't see the harm in getting a straight, no bull shit, up or down.

xvart.

xvart, if you're waiting for a straight answer from Furc, I'll be over in the corner waiting for hell to freeze over.

And then after Satan and I finish practicing our figure skating routine, I'll come and get you


Because you will still be waiting


Because furc will never give a stable straight answer that won't be contradicted by one of his next three posts.


In short, please hammer and end the day.

I ain't no cult, by the time I flip, the rest of you won't be able to make fun of my bad play no more.

You guys still have some time to get your act together to lynch cult instead of a townie.

REMEMBER: The players that are calling me scummy are the ones most desperate to justify their vote on a townie. Those are the players that need to be strung up tomorrow.

-DGB

El Goosuki wrote: To continue being candid, our play has been so bad, we would probably scream for our own lynch if we didn't know our alignment.

-DGB

So your bad play here was okay to lynch you for, but your continued worse play is a scum excuse?

Also, I'll note you didn't answer my question about whether you thought I was scum.

VOTE: El Goosuki

Good riddance.

Bam!




And I mean that. None of this "oh you guys shouldn't have lynched me, I'm obv-town, which is why I did X and took Y as an insanity" If you don't follow the guide, you will be lynched, and it will be your fault, not ours.

Ok, I have a COA to get out of Communing every night from Obsession.
That makes me a happy panda.

Also, just a thought that came to me while choosing an insanity,

We have lots of players who did not vote today, we should force them prove they don't have distraction and/or sadism tomorrow. Or rather, get them modkilled if they don't prove they don't. It wouldn't be hard to make up a roster of people that could have sadism (as of now, not counting tonight's insanity gains), distraction has a larger pool of possibles, so we may not have the patience for that, but it shouldn't be too hard. I think I might make a post about insanities and proving you don't have them. If I have time before the thread closes.


Preview edit: Andrius, what?

Sounds good, Seacore. I completely forgot about the voting insanities. Why would people not take Twitchy though? *twitch*

Oh, awhile back you mentioned that I might get stuck communing forever due to Obsession, but I found a way out of it, so.

Twitchy is great for a declared insanity "I was stabbed but somebody rezzed me" "I graverobbed like you told me to"
Twitchy is bad if you're not supposed to have an insanity.

"Hey guys, Nothing happened tonight *twitch*"

Many other insanities are better for staying under the radar. But we're at the stage that it would be worth calling people on some of them.

Probably the easiest one for cultists to hide, since if you get to L-1, you're probably going to be lynched anyway. And it's safe because we can put people at L-1 and then discuss, and if they haven't declared suicidal, bam!
Can be tested at the start of each day, although it's cumbersome, but who knows, we might catch one.
Can be tested, we get somebody towny to vote for everybody, and then we have other people try and vote for somebody else.
Again, very easy to catch people at this one, and it should be tested.

I started to write about all the insanities, but then I realised I'm helping cultists choose good insanities, so I deleted it all except for the above.

All of these are things we can check for, in thread. Suicidal would be possible, but not practical, but we shouldn't be afraid of bringing people to L-1 if they haven't declared suicidal, because we might catch them out.
The other three can all be checked.

I ask that nobody vote during Day 4, until we discuss whether to start looking into these.

Our plan to get the Cultists mass-modkilled: WIN.

I love it.

It's like the SA:II's plan to get them to commit infractions, but more violent!

The only downside is, if this works, we're going to have a shit-load of bodies to Grave Rob tomorrow night.