Mafiascum.net

still like the vote

↑ Thor665 wrote:

↑ Saki wrote:

↑ Thor665 wrote:

↑ Saki wrote:My erratic playstyle is my pride. I quite value being random and hence unable to have meta used against.

Brilliant work - you have developed a playstyle that prevents people from town reading you, and also disinclines scum from ever killing you because you're functionally useless. I see your playstyle being immensely helpful to you when scum, and of no help whatsoever when you're town. Great work, why can't more people play like that? It's a shame, really, these goofy players and their idea of 'helping town', nothing much to take pride of there, really.

Explain to me how an erratic playstyle prevents people from townreading me.
If I play a different way each game then people should be able to read me based on the way I'm playing that game and not the game I played previously.
I assume that players can read someone based on how they're playing in one game.
Someone who relies on reading people based off how their play in one game compares to another is Smurfing pathetic. Absolutely Smurfing pathetic.
So I don't give people like that room to read me.

This logic implies that you have play that can be read.
Your play this game is best summed up as "defensive lurk"
How should I read that?

However the hell you want to. Don't tell me that you're Smurfing incapable of that, now.

↑ Saki wrote:However the hell you want to. Don't tell me that you're Smurfing incapable of that, now.

I'm not saying I'm not, but you're the one who said we should be able to read you by your play in this game alone.
Can you describe how your play should look pro-town in any way at all?

↑ Sharpest-knife-on-tree wrote:still like the vote

Why?
I don't even know the case on Eddie and don't think you've said it...and that wagon isn't going anywhere and you aren't pushing it.

↑ Thor665 wrote:

↑ Saki wrote:However the hell you want to. Don't tell me that you're Smurfing incapable of that, now.

I'm not saying I'm not, but you're the one who said we should be able to read you by your play in this game alone.
Can you describe how your play should look pro-town in any way at all?

What in the world are you actually asking because I don't get your point at all
You yell at me for the entire game for being useless and rudely ask me to replace out multiple times (yet I haven't seen you ask anyone else to replace out)
Then, right now, you're asking me how I'm pro-town?
You're asking me how I know I'm town and playing like town?
My role PM says town, idk what else I'm supposed to say to you.

Go back to telling me to replace out. You're less of a bother that way.

You're the one who defended your playstyle and questioned my position of calling it pure poison.
I am trying to showcase to you that it is indeed pure poison on the off-chance that you are a) town and b) give a hang.

I will take your snippish reply as a mild bit of awareness from you that I am right.
Feel free to become more pro-town - I might become less frustrated and bothered by your playstyle that way.
I am sorry you find my commentary rude.
If you are town I find the way you are playing the game equally rude to everyone with a town PM.

↑ Thor665 wrote:You're the one who defended your playstyle and questioned my position of calling it pure poison.
I am trying to showcase to you that it is indeed pure poison on the off-chance that you are a) town and b) give a hang.

I will take your snippish reply as a mild bit of awareness from you that I am right.
Feel free to become more pro-town - I might become less frustrated and bothered by your playstyle that way.
I am sorry you find my commentary rude.
If you are town I find the way you are playing the game equally rude to everyone with a town PM.

I defended the nature of my playstyle that varies from GAME-TO-GAME. That has nothing to do with how I'm playing in this game.
And if you consider my play this game "pure poison" then well, you're a tidbit more than nearsighted.
You're making hasty generalizations out of anger because you have no idea what's going on. Instead you resort to complaining about lurkers and apathy in half your posts without actually doing anything to combat the situation except maybe remove the blame on yourself to shove it on everyone else.

And tell me, really, , what I am doing that makes me "rude to everyone witha town pm"

↑ Thor665 wrote:I will take your snippish reply as a mild bit of awareness from you that I am right.

And really, what kind of deluded thinking is this

↑ Saki wrote:

↑ Thor665 wrote:I will take your snippish reply as a mild bit of awareness from you that I am right.

And really, what kind of deluded thinking is this

*cough* confbias *cough*

↑ Saki wrote:And tell me, really,

exactly

, what I am doing that makes me "rude to everyone witha town pm"

Well...how do you see any of your last 4 posts as helping the town wincon?
How about your last 10?
Last 20?

When do you think was your last serious contribution to the town?
That's how I think you're being rude.

I'll repeat the general request for an Eddie case.

↑ Thor665 wrote:I'll repeat the general request for an Eddie case.

lack of Bulba.

But seriously, iso read says a lot.

That's a non-utility answer.

I will counter with 'I have read him as townish pretty much all game' So...would you like to zero me in on the scumminess, because if it's there I cannot see it.

I'm going out of town for the weekend, and my hydra buddy has been pretty mysteriously gone lately, so I'm going to have to



Hopefully I'll be able to post and will annoy all of you with an unnecessary V/LA, but just in case, there you go.

Let's play a game

let's all vote jon, one vote per day

then maybe we can get a lynch!

↑ Thor665 wrote:Well...how do you see any of your last 4 posts as helping the town wincon?
How about your last 10?
Last 20?

That was a shitty answer. I asked you to me, not me. Because I don't see it.
You can sling shit like that all you want.

I'm pretty sure the number of fluff posts in my ISO is pretty much equal to the number of "omg town apathy and lurking omg" posts in your ISO.

↑ Thor665 wrote:When do you think was your last serious contribution to the town?
That's how I think you're being rude.

Rundown on what's happening in the recent Thor vs Saki: Thor can't be bothered to explain why I'm anti-town, and pushes it as a self-evident truth.

He's being illogical and inane.
Not to mention that the only read on me he has on me atm is "oh, vig Saki out of policy for being useless."

VOTE: Thor665

Rach and Dry-fit can wait

VOTE: Thor

the collective seeks greater justice.

You are both fascinatingly terrible.

Saki is pushing a lie and insanity.
Perpetual is...backing the play?

@Saki - how is 'telling you' different than 'showing you' when I cite your iso?

@Perpetual - case. Go.

↑ Saki wrote:RachMarie. Dry-Fit.In light of a recent game, (I believe) anyone who scumreads me with only meta to justify the read is scum.

I haen't suspected you because of meta. I don't know what you're meta is.

Saki wrote:Rach and Dry-fit can wait

lol

Peregrine what kind of traction do you think you're going to get voting Eddie without a case? Because at the moment I'm worried you're just posturing.

Pere's reads and stances yesterday have bought him posture time.

↑ Dry-fit wrote:Peregrine what kind of traction do you think you're going to get voting Eddie without a case? Because at the moment I'm worried you're just posturing.

A case seems like an awful lot of work.

For example, 3137 contains Jordan's case on jon.
Total responses or comments by anyone other than jon: 1 (3138)

I did present my why in 3188. Since it's all of 40 posts, you could probably read the iso, tell my why you love it like Thor, but actually say why, and then I might go into detail.

Look at with regards to Titus flipping scum, ZZZX flipping town, Spring flipping town, and both of those being counterwagons to Titus for 2 days in a row.