In post 2793, PenguinPower wrote:That setup could result in a D2 win for town perfectly played without a scum doctor or roleblocker/jailkeeper.
Sorry forgot to add in the part that I also hate this post
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 3:01 pm
by DVa
Ok so summary of each case:
DVa -- now confirmed town since I haven't hammered yet
Nako: Was off Mew wagon, strongly (incorrectly) townread Gamma and DDL but also wagoned DDL throughout d1 so that's kinda interesting, risk of open wolfing with Sephiroth wagon
PP: Minimal solving, several terrible posts regarding setup spec, speedhammer on Mew, off Seph wagon (but Seph looked awful so... not much towncred there), and I feel like there are tonal issues both with PP-->DDL and with Gamma-->PP
so
If you are town, PP, I have outlined my thoughts. Why am I wrong on you and it's actually Nako, if it is actually Nako?
reads like scum qqing about the setup, and also implies that scum don't have some sort of comparable power role (considering most people were thinking there was a scum JK or scum RB), feels a sniff like TMI
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 3:04 pm
by PenguinPower
I would do neither as scum. If you think I'm scum, hammer.
I'm going to read to my kids, and I'll be back in 20min, but don't expect me to do a long point-by-point response.
p-edit
I mean...on face value, in direct response to what it was responding to, it is not incorrect...sheesh.
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 3:06 pm
by DVa
Like Gamma went out of his way to do some weird push on Nako at EoD yesterday and Gamma tends to be {not great} at scum theater, so like if there's some point where Gamma+Nako reads as w/w it would be there I would think
but there's just so much against you at this point PP you'd really have to point me to something that makes me have to reconsider something
take your time to read to your kids, and you don't have to do a point by point response, but like... if you're town I would like SOME sort of counter-argument, some sort of explanation for why Nako is scum
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 3:07 pm
by DVa
In post 3181, PenguinPower wrote:I mean...on face value, in direct response to what it was responding to, it is not incorrect...sheesh.
it requires assuming that scum have no direct response to town power, which is just like, ???
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 3:11 pm
by DVa
Here we go, I'll flip my usual method
I will definitely NOT hammer you within (expired on 2018-12-11 00:01:04)
so if you are town, you have at least that much time to finish reading to your kids and maybe make at least a few arguments on why Nako is scum, or respond to some of the points that make me think you are scummy
I do not guarantee I am hammering at that point, only that I will NOT hammer you before that deadline is expired. If that is not enough time and you would like another day now that you know, FYPOV, that Nako HAS to be scum, you can ask for another day
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 3:16 pm
by PenguinPower
In post 2791, OkaPoka wrote:Is GS+JK+Vig+Voyeur that unbalanced? no way for scum to have enough firepower to overcome that combo?
In post 2793, PenguinPower wrote:That setup could result in a D2 win for town perfectly played without a scum doctor or roleblocker/jailkeeper.
It was a direct response to a question about scum's firepower to overcome the proposed setup. It wasn't a reference to the actuality of our setup.
I'm going to need a minute to re-read Nako because I didn't think she was scum.
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 3:16 pm
by PenguinPower
Oh, ok.
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 3:19 pm
by Nako
I think PP is not voting me because he is considering voting himself.
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 3:21 pm
by PenguinPower
Yeah, no, I read back through Nako ISO. Nako is right.
VOTE: PP
0% chance of pulling this one out.
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 3:21 pm
by DVa
gg
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 3:22 pm
by PenguinPower
Severe missteps on me and Gamma's part...should have pushed back a bit more.