Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2020 4:12 pm
doesn't make you town, skitter. You know this.
Sure igIn post 3039, Dandelion Wine wrote:In post 1797, Annie Edison wrote:@cabd see if gamma will promise to target fairylit
Why????In post 3152, midwaybear wrote:superbowl scumcasing a general LHF in Gamma seems townie?
And i'm just throwing up my hands at this because it's wildly inaccurate:In post 3129, GFITAC wrote:Okay nope skitter is scumIn post 2877, skitter30 wrote:i dont think scum!gamma would lie abt that
She’s attacking my claim not by saying I’m lying about being BG, but that I’m lying/wrong about WHICH TIME STREAM IT WORKS IN
that’s just not right on so many levels. If you think my BG claim is true why think it’s a scum role? It literally just trades scum for scum (or even worse, scum for town) in any case where it would do the stated purpose. It’s nothing like scum doc because the numbers don’t change because one scum died over another. In addition, it’s common for scum to assume a claim is true since they don’t have to sort the alignment of the claimant. But beyond that she seems to be taking a shot at me by saying I got the side wrong? That looks like scum straining to find an angle to push me on.
UNVOTE: Skitter
I’m still pissed at superb but this is just not how town handles a claim like mine.
Seems too high effortIn post 3182, GFITAC wrote:Why????In post 3152, midwaybear wrote:superbowl scumcasing a general LHF in Gamma seems townie?
Yes plz take the wind out of his sails but he's gonna come up with how he was right for miseliming me anywaysIn post 3183, superbowl9 wrote:Going to work out and get off for the night, final thought - if we actually elim skittle maybe that will be enough of a wakeup call to remove Flavor's cock from the mouths of the wine cave.
Make sure you get that work in firebringer!! :flex:
Okay, maybe my points are all ass. But your reaction to my claim just has a bad vibe. What fucking reason is there to think I’m wrong about which side I work on? You have not justified that opinion anywhere. And like, you may trust my claim but the way you’ve talked about the scum chances of it don’t look natural at all regardless of whether you’re pushing that line of logic.In post 3184, skitter30 wrote:And i'm just throwing up my hands at this because it's wildly inaccurate:In post 3129, GFITAC wrote:Okay nope skitter is scumIn post 2877, skitter30 wrote:i dont think scum!gamma would lie abt that
She’s attacking my claim not by saying I’m lying about being BG, but that I’m lying/wrong about WHICH TIME STREAM IT WORKS IN
that’s just not right on so many levels. If you think my BG claim is true why think it’s a scum role? It literally just trades scum for scum (or even worse, scum for town) in any case where it would do the stated purpose. It’s nothing like scum doc because the numbers don’t change because one scum died over another. In addition, it’s common for scum to assume a claim is true since they don’t have to sort the alignment of the claimant. But beyond that she seems to be taking a shot at me by saying I got the side wrong? That looks like scum straining to find an angle to push me on.
UNVOTE: Skitter
I’m still pissed at superb but this is just not how town handles a claim like mine.
- i never said or implied it was a scum role
- i wasnt taking a shot at you by saying you got the thread wrong. I said that if you did it would be +town, not that if you didnt it was +scum, which is not at all the same thing
- i settled on you being town anyways ffs
I can kinda see this, but like, his case is absolute trash so either he’s scum pushing a trash case on LHF, or extremely awful town.In post 3185, midwaybear wrote:Seems too high effortIn post 3182, GFITAC wrote:Why????In post 3152, midwaybear wrote:superbowl scumcasing a general LHF in Gamma seems townie?
and you to me.In post 3179, skitter30 wrote:Flavor you're exasperating me
Ok, I might take a deeper look later to see if it was really that bad. Right now, I think you might be overblowing it, but maybe you aren't.In post 3189, GFITAC wrote:his case is absolute trash so either he’s scum pushing a trash case on LHF, or extremely awful town.
So exactly like Ilicit Substances where immediately after we got 2 back to back scum fades, 1 being you, and I called out you and the 3rd scum as lock scum that day as well.In post 3188, midwaybear wrote:Yeah, he's probably gonna go like I was wrong, but I can still be right. skitter, you still are leaning town on him though?
And they're gonna eat it up hook line and sinker - I mean there's only so much I can do without them actually having any type of awareness, yet in the postgame thread they will blame it on everyone but themselves and stroke flavor's ego even more. Like no, you just let Flavor railroad you because you think you're a meta expert *cough* titus *cough*In post 3186, skitter30 wrote:Yes plz take the wind out of his sails but he's gonna come up with how he was right for miseliming me anywaysIn post 3183, superbowl9 wrote:Going to work out and get off for the night, final thought - if we actually elim skittle maybe that will be enough of a wakeup call to remove Flavor's cock from the mouths of the wine cave.
Make sure you get that work in firebringer!! :flex:
I never said you couldn't be right...In post 3194, Flavor Leaf wrote:Bring Midway down a tier.
Because we sword fought in the thread, and I have an actual case on you and you're just reacting.In post 3187, skitter30 wrote:The fact that everyone is ok with this is an indicator that something is very wrong here
I'm saying i'm a pr and the way you worded your claim looked like it was possible you misread your role pm, which is why i was asking. And no i hadnt spelled it out before.In post 3189, GFITAC wrote:Okay, maybe my points are all ass. But your reaction to my claim just has a bad vibe. What fucking reason is there to think I’m wrong about which side I work on? You have not justified that opinion anywhere. And like, you may trust my claim but the way you’ve talked about the scum chances of it don’t look natural at all regardless of whether you’re pushing that line of logic.