Mafiascum.net

In post 3168, Lukewarm wrote:And your blind "I am so townie" posts, without the self reflection on the fa t that everyone is scum reading you feels wrong.

I went through a somewhat similar thing in bloodstained, where part way through day 1, a lot of people I thought were really good at reading me, all had me in their scum reads (this includes all three of cabd, ffery, and unwnd btw). And my thinking about it revolves around the fact that I must be doing something different, I must be doing less then normal, or something, because there was no way they were all scum, so AT LEAST ONE (and turned out all three) townie who I think is good at reading me, has me wrong.

But I don't see that anywhere from you. And instead, I'm seeing lots of omgus.

I know it is not fair to expect you to respond exactly the way I would. But you blind confidence in your obvtown status does not look genuine to me, give what you have done this game

In post 3175, WhemeStar wrote:But I did do that. Thats part of the reason why I wanted to talk to Kate about reads and stuff. It worked in Yggdrasil so I figured it would work here and it did.

In post 3155, Titus wrote:

In post 3154, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 3150, DrippingGoofball wrote:Gamma, I'm town.

You need to do a better job sticking to your values, then.

How is DGB not sticking to values?

In post 3181, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 3155, Titus wrote:

In post 3154, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 3150, DrippingGoofball wrote:Gamma, I'm town.

You need to do a better job sticking to your values, then.

How is DGB not sticking to values?

DGB’s thing about scum taking forever to make good fake claims. Were DGB town I’d have expected it to hound Toog about his partial claim until he nailed something down.

In post 3173, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:

In post 3152, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 3149, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:

In post 3140, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 619, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:idk if I responded to this already, but I think possibly you'd break the brainwash. Although maybe not telling you about that would be bordering on bastard, I don't think this game was meant to be bastard but it's been a long time since it went into signups and I forgot. So probably that first thought I had on it is wrong, but it's a moot point now.

This seems to be a clear case of Redemption Equals Death (or vice versa)

What does RED mean?

It means the only way to absolve yourself of your bad actions (such as being a puppet for the bad guy) is to die

So when you say "this" seems to be a clear case of RED or vice versa - what do you mean by "this"?

Did you mean LLD's claimed role, or did you mean the hypothetical I posited in 619 where it is possible LLD could break the brainwash by being forced to kill herself by the scum

"puppeteering"

ability

In post 3179, Cabd wrote:Questions about app are fine, but it's on my home PC and I'm not on home, so no asking for your horroscope.

In post 3186, Cabd wrote:Tool takes literally HOURS to load the data without overtaxing the hampster that runs the site and ruining everyone's night.

I only had time for one person last evening.


I'm using posts from three games of each alignment of the same player list size, and then i have a filter that allows it to ignore posts that contain quotes.

In post 725, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 724, Cabd wrote:

In post 722, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 701, unwnd wrote:That's just how games are now Toog

Geriatric style would be nice but mod doesn't agree so I'm gonna keep it rolling

What is geriatric style? I feel I should be the designated trendsetter for this.

Geriatric_Ruleset

I like it!

In other news I'm content townreading Toogeloo, I see nothing that concerns me.

In post 3183, Cabd wrote:Also fwiw Menalque stepped away from the site for a while as he realized his anger and burnout wasn't mentally healthy.

Keyfabe or not, dude was just ANGRY.

In post 449, unwnd wrote:Should my bias tell me that Lukewarm changing his status to afk after we got into our scuffle is bad news

In post 3192, Lukewarm wrote:

In post 449, unwnd wrote:Should my bias tell me that Lukewarm changing his status to afk after we got into our scuffle is bad news

Is it bad that I town binned unwnd for this post alone?

Spoiler:

exaggeration. I was already leaning town on him with our earlier interaction, but this did kinda put it over the top

Like, when I saw that, I wanted to town bin him. Because that tells me that he was genuinely suspicious of me of he was checking something like that.

Doubly so, since he did not then use that to push me.

It just seems weird for scum!unwnd to be checking that unless he planned on trying to push me out.

In post 3193, Gamma Emerald wrote:Also this app, is it open to the public or what

In post 816, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 803, Kate Bishop wrote:

In post 751, GuyInFreezer wrote:If she's lying about her role (which should be very easily confirmable) we yeet her.
But until then double day is incredibly useful for town so we should just abuse it.
It's really that simple.

If I have my druthers, you and Dunn will be instrumental in guiding what manatee does with her abilities today.

Cabd seems like other stuff is occupying his mental gamespace right now.

Manatee should check in and go over what they want to do with their role now

Last that was heard they wanted to use it to hammer and shoot somebody at night, but using it during the day seems better

In post 830, Kate Bishop wrote:

In post 829, Kate Bishop wrote:I know ffery said it yesterday but DGB's my favorite this game. I am cackling at her posts.

And with that, the assorted footnotes on our DGB read get the strikethrough treatment.