Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2018 1:36 am
https://www.mafiauniverse.com/wiki/Macho_Cop
The Macho Cop cannot be protected from nightkills in any way.
The Macho Cop cannot be protected from nightkills in any way.
wiki wrote:It negates the effects of a Doctor or Bodyguard protecting it, although both would still be seen as having visited a Macho role.
No because I jailkept him, so CS was roleblocked.In post 3199, Scioness Sajj wrote:it's probably CS that Reality got a result on. Random doesn't fit
P.edit. I meant communicative not blocking.In post 3203, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:No because I jailkept him, so CS was roleblocked.In post 3199, Scioness Sajj wrote:it's probably CS that Reality got a result on. Random doesn't fit
And Reality already said that CS was a RECRUIT not a blocking action.
So reality if reality wouldn't get communicative result from cs but something else then we don't have a role that fits what reality sawIn post 3203, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:No because I jailkept him, so CS was roleblocked.In post 3199, Scioness Sajj wrote:it's probably CS that Reality got a result on. Random doesn't fit
And Reality already said that CS was a RECRUIT not a blocking action.
https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=CopIn post 3202, Wisdom wrote:wiki wrote:It negates the effects of a Doctor or Bodyguard protecting it, although both would still be seen as having visited a Macho role.
https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=MachoIn post 3208, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=CopIn post 3202, Wisdom wrote:wiki wrote:It negates the effects of a Doctor or Bodyguard protecting it, although both would still be seen as having visited a Macho role.
Where did you find this quote?
Yes, it fits random.In post 3207, Scioness Sajj wrote:So reality if reality wouldn't get communicative result from cs but something else then we don't have a role that fits what reality sawIn post 3203, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:No because I jailkept him, so CS was roleblocked.In post 3199, Scioness Sajj wrote:it's probably CS that Reality got a result on. Random doesn't fit
And Reality already said that CS was a RECRUIT not a blocking action.
No CS would be a recruit not a communicative action. Neighbourizers recruit. Communicative can only fit random.In post 3205, Wisdom wrote:unless the mod derped and showed him the failed action
says who, btw? Neighborhoods are a means to communicate, not cultsIn post 3214, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:Neighbourizers recruit.
Reality.In post 3217, Wisdom wrote:says who, btw? Neighborhoods are a means to communicate, not cultsIn post 3214, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:Neighbourizers recruit.
In post 2787, Reality Check wrote:I should get recruit too from a neighborizer
In post 2788, Reality Check wrote:RC just responded via PM and the result is even more confusing
If I'm interpreting this correctly, then apparently I should only have seen recruit from him
In post 2792, Reality Check wrote:RC said we would get the same result as we would from a neighborizer
I judt PMed RC if my action was received. I initially jked the worst and asked him if I could change it to CS. He never either told me “no” or that it wasn’t submitted.In post 3222, Wisdom wrote:neighborizer does not recruit into a group of same alignment, like a masonry or a cult
They create a private space for communication
I call that a communicative role
He did make it clear on N3 that my NA on the worst did not go through, due to my role being “disabled” due to GIF dying.In post 3223, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:I judt PMed RC if my action was received. I initially jked the worst and asked him if I could change it to CS. He never either told me “no” or that it wasn’t submitted.In post 3222, Wisdom wrote:neighborizer does not recruit into a group of same alignment, like a masonry or a cult
They create a private space for communication
I call that a communicative role