Page 129 of 207

Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2018 1:36 am
by Nancy Drew 39
https://www.mafiauniverse.com/wiki/Macho_Cop
The Macho Cop cannot be protected from nightkills in any way.

Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2018 1:37 am
by Wisdom
now try mafiawiki

Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2018 1:38 am
by Wisdom
wiki wrote:It negates the effects of a Doctor or Bodyguard protecting it, although both would still be seen as having visited a Macho role.

Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2018 1:39 am
by Nancy Drew 39
In post 3199, Scioness Sajj wrote:it's probably CS that Reality got a result on. Random doesn't fit
No because I jailkept him, so CS was roleblocked.

And Reality already said that CS was a RECRUIT not a blocking action.

Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2018 1:40 am
by Nancy Drew 39
In post 3203, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:
In post 3199, Scioness Sajj wrote:it's probably CS that Reality got a result on. Random doesn't fit
No because I jailkept him, so CS was roleblocked.

And Reality already said that CS was a RECRUIT not a blocking action.
P.edit. I meant communicative not blocking.

Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2018 1:41 am
by Wisdom
unless the mod derped and showed him the failed action

Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2018 1:43 am
by Reality Check
Remind me when I'm doing my catch up or whatever I feel like doing after work

My mood has been trash lately so no guarantees of anything

Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2018 1:47 am
by Scioness Sajj
In post 3203, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:
In post 3199, Scioness Sajj wrote:it's probably CS that Reality got a result on. Random doesn't fit
No because I jailkept him, so CS was roleblocked.

And Reality already said that CS was a RECRUIT not a blocking action.
So reality if reality wouldn't get communicative result from cs but something else then we don't have a role that fits what reality saw

Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2018 1:50 am
by Nancy Drew 39
In post 3202, Wisdom wrote:
wiki wrote:It negates the effects of a Doctor or Bodyguard protecting it, although both would still be seen as having visited a Macho role.
https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Cop

Where did you find this quote?

Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2018 1:53 am
by Nancy Drew 39
In post 3208, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:
In post 3202, Wisdom wrote:
wiki wrote:It negates the effects of a Doctor or Bodyguard protecting it, although both would still be seen as having visited a Macho role.
https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Cop

Where did you find this quote?
https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Macho

Oh, nevermind I found it.

UNVOTE: Reality Check

Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2018 1:53 am
by Nancy Drew 39
VOTE: Whemestar

Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2018 1:54 am
by Nancy Drew 39
In post 3207, Scioness Sajj wrote:
In post 3203, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:
In post 3199, Scioness Sajj wrote:it's probably CS that Reality got a result on. Random doesn't fit
No because I jailkept him, so CS was roleblocked.

And Reality already said that CS was a RECRUIT not a blocking action.
So reality if reality wouldn't get communicative result from cs but something else then we don't have a role that fits what reality saw
Yes, it fits random.

Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2018 1:55 am
by Wisdom
dont see why random would lie about that

Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2018 1:57 am
by Wisdom
way more likely that cs returned communicative and the mod mistakenly included it in the result despite the jailing

Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2018 1:57 am
by Nancy Drew 39
In post 3205, Wisdom wrote:unless the mod derped and showed him the failed action
No CS would be a recruit not a communicative action. Neighbourizers recruit. Communicative can only fit random.

Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2018 1:58 am
by Reality Check
Ask the mod Wisdom

I was told that CShep would return the same result as a neighborizer

Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2018 1:59 am
by Wisdom
Ask him if you should be seeing a blocked action

Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2018 2:01 am
by Wisdom
In post 3214, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:Neighbourizers recruit.
says who, btw? Neighborhoods are a means to communicate, not cults

Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2018 2:01 am
by Nancy Drew 39
I will PM RC. I initially submitted an NA on the worst then changed it CS.

He didn’t tell me it did not go through.

Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2018 2:02 am
by Nancy Drew 39
In post 3217, Wisdom wrote:
In post 3214, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:Neighbourizers recruit.
says who, btw? Neighborhoods are a means to communicate, not cults
Reality.

Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2018 2:05 am
by Nancy Drew 39
In post 2787, Reality Check wrote:I should get recruit too from a neighborizer
In post 2788, Reality Check wrote:RC just responded via PM and the result is even more confusing

If I'm interpreting this correctly, then apparently I should only have seen recruit from him
In post 2792, Reality Check wrote:RC said we would get the same result as we would from a neighborizer

Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2018 2:06 am
by Wisdom
reality is speculating as well

Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2018 2:07 am
by Wisdom
neighborizer does not recruit into a group of same alignment, like a masonry or a cult
They create a private space for communication
I call that a communicative role

Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2018 2:10 am
by Nancy Drew 39
In post 3222, Wisdom wrote:neighborizer does not recruit into a group of same alignment, like a masonry or a cult
They create a private space for communication
I call that a communicative role
I judt PMed RC if my action was received. I initially jked the worst and asked him if I could change it to CS. He never either told me “no” or that it wasn’t submitted.

Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2018 2:12 am
by Nancy Drew 39
In post 3223, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:
In post 3222, Wisdom wrote:neighborizer does not recruit into a group of same alignment, like a masonry or a cult
They create a private space for communication
I call that a communicative role
I judt PMed RC if my action was received. I initially jked the worst and asked him if I could change it to CS. He never either told me “no” or that it wasn’t submitted.
He did make it clear on N3 that my NA on the worst did not go through, due to my role being “disabled” due to GIF dying.