In post 3183, Shrek wrote:std was the only person who visited cheeky n1 and we know hes not scum. why would scum choose to rb cheeky randomly when dgb not being able to add someone to its hood is an infinitely better option
WHAT
how the fuck can Shrek say with any confidence that StD is the ONLY person to visit Cheeky? Because he's scum with the watcher who checked on Cheeky n1, whose claim was criticized for being suspiciously gated to oblivion
IN FACT! That explains the StD NK, since they likely deduced StD was a protective from the fact he targeted the mason claim!
In post 3166, Dwlee99 wrote:Any investigation role or a checker gets that result. Why am I in this thread again
I mean it's still possible Cheeky was RBed, and then that means what to DGB doing no NA?
Shrek is claiming that their action failed (no result) not that DGB visited no one.
Which is exactly what is normal for... normal setups.
Dude what planet are you on
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2021 1:04 pm
by Gamma Emerald
In post 3198, Dwlee99 wrote:Oh the "only person to visit" line. Think that could be Shrek being confused what the hell tracker does.
nuh uh, don't buy it
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2021 1:05 pm
by CheekyTeeky
In post 3204, Gamma Emerald wrote:IN FACT! That explains the StD NK, since they likely deduced StD was a protective from the fact he targeted the mason claim!
In post 3166, Dwlee99 wrote:Any investigation role or a checker gets that result. Why am I in this thread again
I mean it's still possible Cheeky was RBed, and then that means what to DGB doing no NA?
Shrek is claiming that their action failed (no result) not that DGB visited no one.
Which is exactly what is normal for... normal setups.
Dude what planet are you on
Earth, I think.
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2021 1:06 pm
by Dwlee99
Gamma, mega is flipping scum and shrek might not. Scum!Shrek has much less incentive to claim "no result" over "no action seen" and so I'm inclined to believe it a little bit.
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2021 1:06 pm
by LicketyQuickety
Eh... I'll hammer if that's okay?
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2021 1:07 pm
by Dwlee99
Also mega flipping scum watcher would actually make a ton of sense and then we can kill Shrek next. That'd be fine with me. Just kill mega ffs
Thanks, I get accused of that a lot. Really makes me feel good inside.
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2021 1:07 pm
by Gamma Emerald
I don't think who's been on-site for as long as I have, even if not active the entire time, is gonna make such a rookie mistake as not knowing what Tracker does
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2021 1:08 pm
by Dwlee99
This is Shrek's second game
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2021 1:08 pm
by CheekyTeeky
Also to back up Dwlee a bit Shrek was pretty happy wagoning MegA. Counterpoint scum wouldn't mind wagoning unproductive team mates so looking at Cyrus hop might be better.
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2021 1:09 pm
by Nero Cain
WTF is a tracker?!?
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2021 1:10 pm
by Dragon of the West
Yo cheeky in case you're NK'd I'm assuming that you targeting Gamma N1 means that whatever your role is gave you either an inno or nothing incriminating?
but like, Watcher exists and was claimed in this game too? Would Shrek not upon seeing that claim have the gears start turning and probably realize "hey my role doesn't work like I thought it did"?
but like, Watcher exists and was claimed in this game too? Would Shrek not upon seeing that claim have the gears start turning and probably realize "hey my role doesn't work like I thought it did"?
I think that Shrek could have misspoke on "STD was the only one that visited cheeky" and meant "STD visited cheeky" or something similar. Mega flips scum though almost certainly.
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2021 1:12 pm
by Gamma Emerald
that doesn't lead to that level of confidence about what Shrek was trying to say there?