Mafiascum.net

In post 3209, Titus wrote:Benmage, how about actually saying something productive?

You mean voting the active lurker?

I think I'm the only one doing something productive.

In post 3160, Titus wrote:Naut, I have looked at the VCs, and the ISOs of the major wagons and all action since I subbed in.

tierce, that should answer what I have read so far. I thought you would have noticed that.

In post 3226, Titus wrote:

In post 3160, Titus wrote:Naut, I have looked at the VCs, and the ISOs of the major wagons and all action since I subbed in.

tierce, that should answer what I have read so far. I thought you would have noticed that.

That was last night. Is that it? Are you not going to read anything else?

I will. During that time, I'm pushing for information that will help me clarify my understanding of the game while actively posting in my other games.

In post 3214, Tierce wrote:
Hey Kats I really want to lynch you right now for your attempts at pandering to me.

That's not a nice thing to say to someone who missed 120pages of this game.

I still would like to hear reads from you though. I could care less if you want to lynch me.

I don't care about your other games and you shouldn't be talking about them, Titus.

If you're going to read more, then I think it's fairly reasonable for me to ask you if you have done so, and considerably more unreasonable for you to lash out at me with "what the hell is it you are wanting?" when I ask.


Katsuki--there is this nice thing called an ISO that I already linked you to before and if it's not there it's because I'm not too interested in sharing it. You "missed 120 pages" because you don't care to read them, and that's your problem, not mine.

Day 4, Vc 7

The Alchemist (1) -

Benmage

Titus (5) -

Katsuki, AGar, Nautilius, The Alchemist, SafetyDance

elleheathen (3) -

Goat on a Raft, ooba, PrideandJoy

SafetyDance (5) -

kanyeknowsbest, Titus, quadz08, Garruk Relentless, Cephrir

Not voting (6)

:Alfred Borden, elleheathen, Messiah Complex, Shadoweh, Tammy, Tierce

With 20 alive it takes 11 votes to lynch

• Deadline Date: 10th of November at 17:00 EDT
  
• Deadline Countdown: (expired on 2013-11-10 17:00:00)
  
• ooba is V/la

if any mistakes blame phone

and your ISO reads scummy to me. Meh I guess I'll just ask in another few days.

In post 3169, Cephrir wrote:

In post 3168, Doctor Jekyll wrote:I was examining the area around his wagon for anyone who might have been deliberately detracting from it. I was also looking for potentially awkward half bussing but I didn't find anything that stuck out.

Because Tierce pretty much universally fucked over anyone who tried to even hint at Garruk-scum

???

Re-read me pushing on Garruk early D3, and then Tierce's responses.

In post 3169, Cephrir wrote:

In post 3168, Doctor Jekyll wrote:

Goat-scum seems highly improbable

It actually doesn't?

Scum doublevoter isn't a terrible stretch, although I would expect it to be limited. Scum giving out a # of how many scum there are doesn't seem probable at all.

In post 3171, Nautilius wrote:

In post 3167, AGar wrote:Wanna stop fucking pussyfooting it?

I'm doing something else atm.

So the answer is no. Gotcha.

Nautscum is probably a thing.

Stop being cryptic. Very clearly post "N1 I did this to X. N2 I did this to Y. N3 I did this to Z." If you're town, you gain nothing from being clever about what happened.

You're really missing a key point for why people are questioning this SD thing. Ceph brought it up in #3224.Let SD do the talking, because since you've started answering for him, he's gone quiet. There's some serious disconnects in his story, and they need to be ironed out or strung up. I get your frustration that this is being hung up on something you see as fairly cut and dried, but the rest of us don't so stop trying to squash it.

In post 3233, AGar wrote:

In post 3169, Cephrir wrote:

In post 3168, Doctor Jekyll wrote:I was examining the area around his wagon for anyone who might have been deliberately detracting from it. I was also looking for potentially awkward half bussing but I didn't find anything that stuck out.

Because Tierce pretty much universally fucked over anyone who tried to even hint at Garruk-scum

???

Re-read me pushing on Garruk early D3, and then Tierce's responses.

I saw them. Nothing is universally anything.

In post 3233, AGar wrote:

In post 3169, Cephrir wrote:

In post 3168, Doctor Jekyll wrote:

Goat-scum seems highly improbable

It actually doesn't?

Scum doublevoter isn't a terrible stretch, although I would expect it to be limited. Scum giving out a # of how many scum there are doesn't seem probable at all.

In post 3233, AGar wrote:

In post 3171, Nautilius wrote:

In post 3167, AGar wrote:Wanna stop fucking pussyfooting it?

I'm doing something else atm.

So the answer is no. Gotcha.

Nautscum is probably a thing.

I'll be around tomorrow.

In post 3233, AGar wrote:

@Tierce

You're really missing a key point for why people are questioning this SD thing. Ceph brought it up in #3224.Let SD do the talking, because since you've started answering for him, he's gone quiet. There's some serious disconnects in his story, and they need to be ironed out or strung up. I get your frustration that this is being hung up on something you see as fairly cut and dried, but the rest of us don't so stop trying to squash it.

I thought it was the other way around because of the ninja comments earlier, so I can't disagree that he needs to answer clearly himself. Besides after the way he was swearing at you earlier Tierce I hardly think he deserves white knighting. I'd rather you tell me who the scum are so I know who to vote/flambe. <.<

In post 3189, Tammy wrote:Okay SafetyDance

You tracked

You blocked

You vendored

In post 3191, Tammy wrote:

In post 3187, SafetyDance wrote:

In post 3180, Tammy wrote:So SafetyDance if you roleblocked Quadz last night because you were suspicious of him, why does it not worry you that we are missing a kill last night?

That should make you a little more worried about quadz, not feel utterly nonchalant about the whole business.

I cant use a 1shot block twice. Nice try.

THEN WHY DID YOU CLAIM UNLESS NAUTILUS WAS A NINJA HE DIDN'T GO ANYWHERE NIGHT TWO?

AND WHEN ZDENEK ASKED YOU WHY YOU TRACKED NAUTILUS YOU DIDN'T CORRECT HIM THAT YOU BLOCKED HIM?

LIKE FFS.

In post 3085, SafetyDance wrote:

In post 3081, Cephrir wrote:Well that was unnecessarily hostile.

You confused Ninja with Strongman, your brilliance.

Pfft. More than happy to volley snarky bs back with interest.

Ninja's avoid detection, which is how Naut would avoid being detected doing anything night 2.

In post 2579, Zdenek wrote:SafetyDance, I still want to know why you chose Nautilus.

LIKE FFS

In post 3199, Garruk Relentless wrote:SSK checking in here. In addition to SD's lack of clarity regarding his claim, this hydra also thinks he's scum because of the difference of his play as compared to Lucid Dreamers Mafia. In Lucid Dreamers, he was way more active and making cases more on everyone. And you know, so explicit with how roles worked that he actually made a table of all the actions that had been performed. So in conclusion

Vote SafetyDance

-SSK

Haha, hadn't realised this was an open setup with accountable game mechanics! I'm scum because I haven't made a table, ya got me!

A+! Give Nat a sticker! Would play with again! Voting for scummies!

Fuck knows what Titus is on but I'd like some. Send express to East Coast plz, k thx.

In post 3221, Tammy wrote:I'd probably be down with a safety dance lynch. Meta him. I read through that game Garruck mentioned, and safety dance wanted to lynch chkflip for lol not playing the game. He's also been active in at least one other game all month while doing nothing but lobbing sanctimonious insults in this game.

He's not some blundering VI fool. He knows how to play this damn game and I don't know why he's being written off as the town idiot when he's patently not a fucking idiot.

I swear if he's scum. Words. There will be words.

I know I'm not an idiot, it does get tiresome having to respond to all the idiot comments, it does rather limit scumhunting, and I'd much prefer to do that with the limited time I have. I love your meta arguments btw, they change more than kanye's reads. <3

actually you are

SD, what the hell is the point of that post?

Can you PLEASE just put your actions and results in the blanks?

N1: _________
N2: __________
N3: __________

UNVOTE:
VOTE: SafetyDance

<3

For those of you too busy punching SafetyDance, tracked links to quadz on N3 and blocked leads to Nautilis on N2. My hands, they are up in the air.
So anyways Safety, who are the scums and etc.

Are you reading what is currently happening? The point is for SD to answer what he did. In addition to trying to answer for him, you've thrown a question in there drippping with placating tone.

SD

must

confuse

town


this feels like he suscribes to the Kuribo Guide To Being Mafia (carnival of lunacy, etc) but is rather poor at it more than anything else. Yes, I've seen town be dumb at claims before, but this level of obstinacy is just simply not town. No way no how.

Phone.

VOTE: SafetyDance

That's L minus 2.