Page 130 of 224

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2019 10:27 am
by texcat
VOTE: Eevee

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2019 10:30 am
by EeveeLution Army
well thats a bit out of nowhere? idk if thats hammer. but could you explain that?

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2019 10:31 am
by EeveeLution Army
In post 2962, texcat wrote:
Unofficial, corrected, and probably wrong (but hey, at least it's here) VC
Alonzo - (5):
- Cliff Booth, bob4131, Garmr, profii, Judge Joseph Dread
EeveeLution Army - (3):
- Rick Dalton, AaronFrost, gobbledygook
Garmr - (2):
- davesaz, texcat
Judge Joseph Dread - (2):
- Carcalilly, Titus
Tchill13 - (1):
- Hectic
Hopkirk - (1):
- Tchill13
gobbledygook - (1):
- Hopkirk
profii - (1):
- Alonzo

Not Voting:
Kop, EeveeLution Army, Billy Pilgrim

With 19 alive, it takes 10 to lynch.


Deadline:
(expired on 2019-10-10 05:35:11)


In post 2961, Hopkirk wrote:Why's there still an eevee wagon going on.

-Hop
Why wouldn't there be? Did Eevee do something to change their minds? I'm still willing to
hop
er, jump back on her. And I noticed while doing the VCs that she has never voted toDay.

you werent on me at this time. nor did you shift at this point so why now?

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2019 10:32 am
by EeveeLution Army
or is me voting after this suspicious to you?

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2019 10:36 am
by EeveeLution Army
though ive given my reads. so my usefulness is closing in to little. if being useless is the reasoning i can see that. idc about dying. could you explain though? you seemed to get off me at some point. meaning your opinion changed?

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2019 10:42 am
by AaronFrost
Holy shit we have less than 2 days and this game is dragging.

Alonzo is at L-2 right?

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2019 10:45 am
by Hopkirk
You're on 3 or 4 votes Eevee. What made you think you could have been hammered.

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2019 10:48 am
by texcat
I would rather lynch Garmr, but that doesn't seem likely. I voted you earlier and said in the post you quoted that I was still willing to vote you. My opinion did not change.

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2019 10:50 am
by EeveeLution Army
i thought i was higher lol. closer to 6/7/8.

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2019 10:53 am
by EeveeLution Army
the thing i quoted was 3 days ago. for context.

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2019 11:17 am
by davesaz
In post 3189, Hopkirk wrote:@Dave: how come you haven't wanted an explained readslist from Eevee, or Kop, or Titus, or Gobble, or Tchill who never explained his scumread on me beyond a sentence, or Rick who just says stuff (which I think is his meta though), or literally anyone else?
Oh heya couple pages happened.
My supply of round toits ran out.

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2019 12:11 pm
by Titus
Hopkirk doesn't look good with the what about others defense.

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2019 1:19 pm
by Rick Dalton
In post 3163, Alonzo wrote:The living embodiment of floaty and non committal, and whos vote should have been on me since I joined (and yesterday should have been all over Sharon Tate)
I’m the only one who knew who Sharon Tate was, I wasn’t gonna vote there. :lol:

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2019 1:39 pm
by davesaz
How would the knowing have any effect on the voting?

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2019 1:40 pm
by davesaz
In post 3236, Titus wrote:Hopkirk doesn't look good with the what about others defense.
Do you think that's all he's doing?

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2019 1:57 pm
by Titus
In post 3239, davesaz wrote:
In post 3236, Titus wrote:Hopkirk doesn't look good with the what about others defense.
Do you think that's all he's doing?
In that post, yes.

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2019 2:15 pm
by davesaz
How about the rest of the posts? Thoughts on anyone else?

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2019 2:23 pm
by Titus
Right now, I think Alonzo has a high chance of being scum due to the last second counter on EEarmy

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2019 2:24 pm
by Billy Pilgrim
In post 3175, Hopkirk wrote:@Billy: how are you reading Aaron now?

@Hop - I was scum reading Aaron, but i'm town reading you and I think your meta read of him made sense. So he's out of my lynch pool for the moment.

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2019 2:30 pm
by EeveeLution Army
In post 3242, Titus wrote:Right now, I think Alonzo has a high chance of being scum due to the last second counter on EEarmy

Btw a shorter way to say my name is ela. If that helps people.

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2019 2:38 pm
by Billy Pilgrim
In post 3210, AaronFrost wrote:
In post 3177, Hopkirk wrote:Billy's town. His scumgame was reserved/cautious/as far as I can tell he subbed out due to pressure from it. He has a lot of natural feeling posts this game.
Agree with this. I've played with Billy in the Newbie Queue and this feels very much like his town game. I just hope he doesn't mislynch me again like he did in 1949 :P
Well Korina and Datisi aren't here so it's unlikely that you'll get hard pocketed by Korina which made me lock!scum you D4.

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2019 5:18 pm
by Judge Joseph Dredd
Why is this day still ongoing? Why wasn't Alonzo lynched?

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2019 6:21 pm
by Cliff Booth
yes let us lynch alonzo

Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2019 12:48 am
by gobbledygook
VOTE: Alonzo

We need to consolidate

Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2019 3:00 am
by Hopkirk
In post 3235, davesaz wrote:
In post 3189, Hopkirk wrote:@Dave: how come you haven't wanted an explained readslist from Eevee, or Kop, or Titus, or Gobble, or Tchill who never explained his scumread on me beyond a sentence, or Rick who just says stuff (which I think is his meta though), or literally anyone else?
Oh heya couple pages happened.
My supply of round toits ran out.
Hi, it's your local Dave translator here. What does Dave's unexplained obscure phrase that understanding his post relies on mean this time? Well that's anyone's guess. Apparently 'toits' can mean 'rooftops, tight or tits' none of which make any sense in that context, and a search of 'toit' on mafiascum doesn't come up with anything. It's almost enough to make you think he doesn't care about people understanding him and would be more comfortable just yelling at a wall or something. Preferably a short wall since he'll need some sunlight to counteract all this shade and these personal attacks I'm throwin' at 'im.