Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2019 3:02 pm
And no, fuck you G5.
G6 is shading, get him L5In post 3228, Gentleman 6 wrote:G4, you actually scum then?
I don't think that I've been toxic this game.In post 3233, Gentleman 3 wrote:Is there a scummie for "most toxicity caused in order to win a game"?
In post 3234, Gentleman 6 wrote:I don't think that I've been toxic this game.In post 3233, Gentleman 3 wrote:Is there a scummie for "most toxicity caused in order to win a game"?
Lol i love this game.In post 3225, Gentleman 6 wrote:And no, fuck you G5.
This specifically is what interests me. Feedback on this.In post 3214, Gentleman 4 wrote:Alright here's the couples I'm considering for today in no particular order:
Lady 5 and Gentleman 8:
Spoiler: I've already covered this, and I think it's a dead horse now, but here's my argument in case you missed it:
Gentleman 5 and Lady 4: The case against Gentleman 5 is debatable. I've liked what he brought to the table in the past, but Gentleman 1 made a solid point about his Lady 2 "joke." I'm really not certain about this pair, I'd really rather have more time to sort through this, because I've been very much on the fence about both these player's alignments. I think based on Gentleman 5's "joke," flipping this pair might be indicative of Lady 2 scum.
Gentleman 3 and Lady 6: Lady 6 has said very convenient things at convenient times before, and several of her more interesting posts have been noted several times by other players. I will go through these when I get the chance, but I think she's slid significantly under the radar due to her absence. There have been a couple things she's done that have barely any game relevancy but can be indicative of her being town on her main account, though, so this is something to keep in consideration. I have never been a fan of Gentleman 3's posting, it all looks particularly fake and his activity has dropped conveniently after finding a partner - right around the same time everyone else was looking at Gentleman 5 and Lady 4.
Gentleman 1 and Lady 2: Not really a pairing I was considering at the beginning of the day, I like Gentleman 1 for the most part, but Lady 2's flip could help determine the alignment of several other players here and I've been less and less convinced by her posting recently.
I am exactly zero interested in lynching lady 2 for unflipped associatives.In post 3239, Gentleman 4 wrote:This specifically is what interests me. Feedback on this.
If L5 flips scum can you be convinced?In post 3245, Lady 4 wrote:I am exactly zero interested in lynching lady 2 for unflipped associatives.In post 3239, Gentleman 4 wrote:This specifically is what interests me. Feedback on this.
Someone would need to explain why to me again.In post 3247, Gentleman 5 wrote:If L5 flips scum can you be convinced?In post 3245, Lady 4 wrote:I am exactly zero interested in lynching lady 2 for unflipped associatives.In post 3239, Gentleman 4 wrote:This specifically is what interests me. Feedback on this.