Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2022 7:43 pm
VC 3.04
With 9 players, it takes 5 to make a decision. Day 3 ends in (expired on 2022-05-03 09:00:00).
I'm not sure how you could think my positioning on the Mala wagon was suspicious if that's your only reason. I voted all the way back on page 3 during RVS, essentially starting the wagon, and I questioned her further and made some follow up posts when she was around to talk.In post 3126, ItalianoVD wrote:Spoiler:
Listen, frankly I’ve been trying to keep up since midday Day 1 and I’m failing immensely. I’ve basically given up trying to truly catchup and decided to just follow the events live.
Early on I thought HEM’s initial take on Mala was in good faith. I don’t agree with Gamma here regarding that it wasn’t. I could see why Mala was getting the heat she was and I wasn’t totally against it. I did start to feel some townie frustration from Mala though, so when I saw you jump on, it made me suspicious and then koopa and then Kitty. I really started to feel like her wagon was scum driven and you and Kitty jumped out to me. It was not who you were voting for, but how you did it. And I know both or all scum weren’t likely on the wagon but that’s where my head was.
Also at the time it felt like a possible pocket attempt on HEM with 69 coupled with 119. And the overall way you were positioning yourself around the two slots (HEM/Mala) was highly suspicious to me. From what I can remember you’ve been kinda following HEM around this whole game. And if he is town, then imo it can point to you being scum.
What has changed that should make me think otherwise? I mean if I’m wrong about you, then show me why. If I’ve missed something somewhere, which I probably did, then point me to it. You just saying I’m wrong means nothing to me.
I feel like this post in particular shows that I was genuinely trying to solve her alignment, and that I had a more complex reason for voting her then just "jumping on". And when it got to a point that I reconsidered my read, I backed off and gave my reasoning when questioned by HEM.In post 118, Roden wrote:Ok but we're in the RVS stage/trying to leave RVS, there isn't a whole lot to go off of so we're voting for whatever reason makes at least some sense and then seeing how others/the game state reacts. I feel like you've experienced enough to know this.In post 107, Malakittens wrote:it's more for getting warned by the mod thing.
I actually enjoy mafia sometimes and i really dont want to be banned
esp
for something so stupid of "oh she's being self conscious" lets vote her!!!
But to say "just vote me out so I don't get banned" instead of picking literally any other option is just ???
Like, if you're town this just fucks us over because you're essentially just making yourself a policy elim that provides no info upon your flip. Everybody who votes you in this scenario can essentially do it for free because they can just say "she asked to die so I voted for her". Though obviously if you're scum then this is just AtE to get people to back off.
Another layer to this is that, in that game you were scum in that I've been referencing, Toogeloo did the exact same thing you're currently doing, got town read for it, and did end up being town. I feel like that has to be at the back of your mind here, and that you're trying to get town read by emulating that same behavior.
I don't think your reason for voting NK15 makes sense and I'm trying to understand it. If it was a 50/50 chance on whether or not NK15 was scum, and a 100% chance that Andres was scum, voting NK15 doesn't make sense to me. And this doesn't really address the rest of what I said.In post 3130, ItalianoVD wrote:Spoiler:
Don’t @ me, if you read all my Day 2 posts, everyone can see where my head was. Why are you even asking these questions expecting a different answer? Come on bruh.
Did you link the wrong posts? Those posts are about Leaf and Scorpius, I don't mention Andres at all there. In fact, Andres hadn't even replaced into the game yet, not until post 848.In post 3202, ItalianoVD wrote:Also, Roden’s push on me is quite skewed given the arguments.
Roden’s case against me is:
1) I defended Andres’ slot.
2) I voted for NK15 over Andres’ slot.
3) I voted for HEM even though I said I townread him.
784 is where Roden defends Andres’ slot and elaborated in 790
HEM, Kitty myself and Roden ‘defended’ Andres’ slot. But why were we saying it? It’s poor play in general and not alignment indicative.
I never defended him anyway, and it's pretty easy to prove by just going into my ISO and using Ctrl + F to search his name.In post 848, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Andresvmb replaces Saladman27
Mathblade replaces Facebones
Please welcome them!
I...don't understand what you mean here. What does Koopa's vote have to do with anything? What makes us all scum?In post 3214, ItalianoVD wrote:Let me make this clearer. What I mean to say is koopa’s vote on a basically empty slot wasn’t helping anything. Calling it out is nai. If I’m scum for doing that, then you’re all scum. You good with that?In post 3202, ItalianoVD wrote:Also, Roden’s push on me is quite skewed given the arguments.
Roden’s case against me is:
1) I defended Andres’ slot.
2) I voted for NK15 over Andres’ slot.
3) I voted for HEM even though I said I townread him.
784 is where Roden defends Andres’ slot and elaborated in 790
HEM, Kitty myself and Roden ‘defended’ Andres’ slot. But why were we saying it? It’s poor play in general and not alignment indicative.
Furthermore, I think you trying to use that as a case on me is very poor and you must have forgot your actions. Anyway I’ll wait for you to respond before rendering final judgment read wise.
To clarify, I did that to make them look worse so they don't get shot rather than me particularly thinking they were scum but that also merged with my visceral repulsion of their play-style.In post 3230, MalcolmTucker wrote:I get that Scorpious/Jackson going for Koopa may have seemed weird but it'd have so illogical and baffling for two mafia to both go on the same role-claimed player bandwagon.
I am not, I do not care if you refer to how I play as flashy. It is not sidelining, I am playing by my own ways who are you to tell me how I should play.In post 3221, MathBlade wrote:Because you are.In post 3219, JacksonVirgo wrote:How in the living fuck do you call me sidelining?In post 3218, MathBlade wrote:For example I see you and a JV team and I don’t like how JV is sidelining this. I’d like if JV asked more questions.
You’re doing flashy things but conversations are passing you by.
You’re not posting any thoughts regarding the current conversation.
Claiming backup vigilante is flashy.
Claiming a fake guilty on HEM is flashy.
But you’re almost universally TR’d. I want to see you use that in a protown way if you’re town.
Why do people ever think this works???In post 3231, JacksonVirgo wrote:To clarify, I did that to make them look worse so they don't get shot rather than me particularly thinking they were scum but that also merged with my visceral repulsion of their play-style.In post 3230, MalcolmTucker wrote:I get that Scorpious/Jackson going for Koopa may have seemed weird but it'd have so illogical and baffling for two mafia to both go on the same role-claimed player bandwagon.
feelsIn post 3234, MathBlade wrote:
I am nauseous af and it’s critical role night but I wish everyone would flip but me.
I wouldn't have thought town would have made that play either, which is what I was trying to tell you. You can't blame me for pushing someone for being outrageously scummy.In post 3230, MalcolmTucker wrote:Re your points in 3220 Kitty - I get that Scorpious/Jackson going for Koopa may have seemed weird but it'd have so illogical and baffling for two mafia to both go on the same role-claimed player bandwagon. It was clearly never going to pick up and I'm struggling to believe you wouldn't have been able to see that at all.
My general point is here that you pushed Scorpious in particular without ever considering whether their play was too illogical or lazy for a clever mafia player trying to get of trouble. If Scorpious is mafia then fine, but the fact they were town clearly indicates you here to an extent - I ultimately don't know your alignment and to me it looks like you strongly pushed two townies because you spotted some holes in their play and saw it as a convenient thing to do.
I also think it's quite possible you/Math could be a team if HEM doesn't come back as mafia. You're defending Math and Math is very hedgy on you in 3222 as well.
Smart. I liked koopa's playstyle though. It's part of why I thought Scorp was scum, he seemed scared of such an active player.In post 3231, JacksonVirgo wrote:To clarify, I did that to make them look worse so they don't get shot rather than me particularly thinking they were scum but that also merged with my visceral repulsion of their play-style.In post 3230, MalcolmTucker wrote:I get that Scorpious/Jackson going for Koopa may have seemed weird but it'd have so illogical and baffling for two mafia to both go on the same role-claimed player bandwagon.
My condolences.In post 3237, Malakittens wrote:i found out my dad's mom's brother passed away this morning.
i found myself thinking about old times
so not really in the mood 2night
What's the harm in trying.In post 3233, Gamma Emerald wrote:Why do people ever think this works???In post 3231, JacksonVirgo wrote:To clarify, I did that to make them look worse so they don't get shot rather than me particularly thinking they were scum but that also merged with my visceral repulsion of their play-style.In post 3230, MalcolmTucker wrote:I get that Scorpious/Jackson going for Koopa may have seemed weird but it'd have so illogical and baffling for two mafia to both go on the same role-claimed player bandwagon.
If everyone is scummy to you maybe stop complaining about it and consider that your view on scumminess is possibly just plain wrong.In post 3234, MathBlade wrote:I want to pretty much light this entire page on fire because of all the scumminess.
Roden’s reactions do not remind me of their towngame at all. They were much more calm and collected.
Malcolm’s post looks like he’s chaining up miselims and just feels ewww
JV’s intentionally making people look worse and at the same time wondering why the hell I find their laid back play scummy and then has the gumption to argue that I should just shut up and like it anyway
Then gamma doesn’t comment on any of it and complains…
Like all of this is just bad.
I am nauseous af and it’s critical role night but I wish everyone would flip but me.
To clarify I work full-time so I usually get 5 day weeks with 2 days off. Now I have 6 days with 1 day off and then one day off in the middle of the following week after like 3 other shifts.In post 3245, JacksonVirgo wrote:I think I am just angry at everything recently, apologies. Got rostered 6 days of work with a single day off and when doing overnights that means I can't do shit, actually pissed off.
Which is?In post 3236, Gamma Emerald wrote:I'm kinda out of it, I had a bit of a personal epiphany this evening
I claim infinite shot good friend hugger activated on request.In post 3237, Malakittens wrote:i found out my dad's mom's brother passed away this morning.
i found myself thinking about old times
so not really in the mood 2night
The only town game I remember of yours is where I shot you N1 when I was essentially soloing it as scum. You seemed more casey and such.In post 3238, Roden wrote:Kinda surreal to read that I'm apparently coming off as much less calm and collected than usual when I had an actual emotional breakdown in my last town game.