Page 14 of 48

Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 1:37 pm
by TheIrishPope
Mod is busy anyway, I think.
Are you planning to vote for me?

Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 1:40 pm
by thenewearth
Yes but I really don't know the VC.

Heck you might even be at L-1 from what I know

Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 1:44 pm
by TheIrishPope
Nah because when you voted for me I was at L-2 including Vegito's slot's vote, so that's why I am guessing L-3.
If you so desperately want to lynch a townie, vote for me now, regardless of VC, or do a VC yourself.

Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 1:45 pm
by thenewearth
In post 327, TheIrishPope wrote:If you so desperately want to lynch a townie
OMFG NOT AGAIN!

Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 2:09 pm
by Vegito
In post 321, TheIrishPope wrote:Your posts are fucking walls of text. How can I possibly decipher them?
Mate, if you think
my
posts are walls of text, you aught to find a new game to play. I'm very brief in contrast to many of the players on this site.

Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 2:18 pm
by TheIrishPope
Then it won't be hard for you to state your reasons without quotes and such for the casual observer.

Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 2:44 pm
by Vegito
Sure.

You have a scum wincon. This leads to scum motivation for your posting. Scum motivation shows through in your intent behind your posts. All of this is readily available in your ISO, and the supporting arguments for this point of view are available - with quotes - in my ISO.

Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 2:46 pm
by TheIrishPope
In post 331, Vegito wrote:Sure.

You have a scum wincon. This leads to scum motivation for your posting. Scum motivation shows through in your intent behind your posts. All of this is readily available in your ISO, and the supporting arguments for this point of view are available - with quotes - in my ISO.
I could just repeat this and say the same thing about you. You make no sense.

Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 3:06 pm
by Ghostlin
In post 327, TheIrishPope wrote:Nah because when you voted for me I was at L-2 including Vegito's slot's vote, so that's why I am guessing L-3.
If you so desperately want to lynch a townie, vote for me now, regardless of VC, or do a VC yourself.
AtE. And I've used this as scum. *Eyeroll*

Also, why do I have the feeling that some of us are doing the heavy lifting and others aren't? Hamlet REALLY isn't contributing.

Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 3:09 pm
by TheIrishPope
So because you use it as scum, I am scum? That's some nice reasoning there, Ghostlin[/sarcasm]
I am not even appealing to emotion. I was attacking TNE's arguments. If he wants to lynch me, no one is forcing him to not do it.

Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 5:20 pm
by chkflip
Image


Day One Vote Count III
1. TheIrishPope (2) - Vegito, Ghostlin
2. sword_of_omens (0)
3. fferyllt (0)
4. PimHel (0)
5. thenewearth (0)
6. Ghostlin (2) - thenewearth, Bacde
7. Vegito (2) - PimHel, sword_of_omens
8. Bacde (0)
9. Hamlet (0)

NINE ALIVE, FIVE LYNCH
DEADLINE: (expired on 2013-05-20 12:00:00)

Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 5:24 pm
by thenewearth
Ok finally

VOTE: TIP

Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 7:40 pm
by Vegito
In post 332, TheIrishPope wrote:
In post 331, Vegito wrote:Sure.

You have a scum wincon. This leads to scum motivation for your posting. Scum motivation shows through in your intent behind your posts. All of this is readily available in your ISO, and the supporting arguments for this point of view are available - with quotes - in my ISO.
I could just repeat this and say the same thing about you. You make no sense.
I can evince my argument with quotes. Can you?

Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 7:12 am
by PimHel
In post 311, Vegito wrote:
In post 306, PimHel wrote:Vegito, you're scum.
I'm gonna have to go ahead and disagree with you there.

You should vote Pope.
No. I can see Pope's actions coming from town. Dr P has done the actions coming from a scum mindset.

@Ghostlin
Seriously? You accuse Pope of AtE. Yet Dr P's whole big 'replace me' screamed AtE. And nowhere, were you to point that out. What is your opinion of Dr P?

Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 8:09 am
by PimHel
V/LA till monday

I might be able to post tomorrow morning and perhaps sometimes when I'm away, but I can't promise anything.

Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 8:11 am
by fferyllt
I am not going to consider following Vegita's PoE list until I have a chance to chat with Nacho.

Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 9:00 am
by Bacde
hey guys everyone is ignoring how ghostlin assumed that TIP was claiming vengeful

Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 9:19 am
by fferyllt
In post 341, Bacde wrote:hey guys everyone is ignoring how ghostlin assumed that TIP was claiming vengeful
Not exactly, just holding

When I am scum I can get exceedingly paranoid about vengefuls and bombs, depending on mod meta and recent fads. but, that's me. doesn't necessarily translate to anyone else.

Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 10:46 am
by TheIrishPope
In post 337, Vegito wrote:
In post 332, TheIrishPope wrote:
In post 331, Vegito wrote:Sure.

You have a scum wincon. This leads to scum motivation for your posting. Scum motivation shows through in your intent behind your posts. All of this is readily available in your ISO, and the supporting arguments for this point of view are available - with quotes - in my ISO.
I could just repeat this and say the same thing about you. You make no sense.
I can evince my argument with quotes. Can you?
You never talked about scum motivation behind my actions, and have not justified your posts. How can you be so hypocritical? Your only reason for voting me is "Post 69 lol"
In post 315, Vegito wrote:
In post 313, TheIrishPope wrote:Well, my vote isn't on anyone for now. Ghostlin, I did not town PR claim...
And Vegito, I don't understand your reasons. If you're not voting Ghostlin for obvious reasons then you are scum.
I have a town read on Ghostlin. Is that obvious enough?
Town motivation behind his posts and why he is not scummier than me.
VOTE: Vegito

Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 11:19 am
by Vegito
In post 343, TheIrishPope wrote:You never talked about scum motivation behind my actions, and have not justified your posts. How can you be so hypocritical? Your only reason for voting me is "Post 69 lol"
Pretty much empirically wrong on every level. But I suppose you just need a reason to OMGUS me, right?
In post 343, TheIrishPope wrote: Town motivation behind his posts and why he is not scummier than me.
In English?

Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 11:20 am
by Vegito
In post 338, PimHel wrote:No. I can see Pope's actions coming from town. Dr P has done the actions coming from a scum mindset.
Go through my ISO and explain how each point I make on Pope has town motivation.

And while you're at it, you could try reading
me
, since we now know that Pepper was a colossal idiot.

Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 11:23 am
by TheIrishPope
Then please repeat them, because I appear to have gone blind.
I reckon that is English.
Show and explain Ghostlin's town motivation behind his posts and actions. Also, state why I look scummier in your eyes.
And don't use those silly logical fallacies you always use.
PimHel does not need to read you. Having read DP, PimHel is certain you replaced into a scum slot.

Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 12:12 pm
by Vegito
In post 346, TheIrishPope wrote:Show and explain Ghostlin's town motivation behind his posts and actions. Also, state why I look scummier in your eyes.
And don't use those silly logical fallacies you always use.
PimHel does not need to read you. Having read DP, PimHel is certain you replaced into a scum slot.
1) Ghostlin is town for posts 215/216. Like really obvtown. As in scum doesn't make those kinds of posts.
2) Ergo you're scummier by contrast just by the virtue of how town Ghostlin is. You
are
, however, scummier for other reasons as well. I'll get to that.
3) What fallacies? :neutral: Using buzzwords doesn't make your argument stronger.
4) PimHel
does
need to read me. I am a player in a slot. If he is town, then he can't be
certain
I replaced into a scum slot. If he's scum, then I guess he's got the wool over my eyes.

Spoiler: PopeScum
Post 69 is self-explanatory and has already been discussed to death.
Your vote of Ghostlin in 82 "nowhere does it say 2 scum..." reeks of scum looking for a reason to distract from their wagon.
Your 84 deflection was pure scumshit.
158 is more scum deflection by way of misrep.
161 is obvious caughtscum posting.
213 (touched on by Ghostlin in aforementioned posts) is sickeningly bad.
238 was a trash attempt to softclaim the wagon away.
332 was more scum deflection.
OMGUS in 343 with misrepped reasons.

All of the above spoilered was readily available in the ISO. In fact, you can ISO me and this post side-by-side and pick out exactly where each one comes from.

Now can we
please
lynch the shit out of Pope?

Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 12:18 pm
by fferyllt
still waiting for Nacho to show up

Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 12:22 pm
by Vegito
You may be waiting a very long time. He's not even posting regularly on his main, and he never remembers the PW for this account.