HEY, HEY you just voted me, why'd you remove your vote. I'm your votee remember???
In post 334, Nachomamma8 wrote:NS, for what it's worth, I'm completely reassured about you.
I haven't read the game, but what makes you so reassured about ns. That's a little weird to hear from you
Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2013 3:09 pm
by Bert
In post 272, phokdapolees wrote:Pertaining to the actual game, I just finished catching up on everything, and here's what I think so far (forgive me if I mix up facts or something like that, it's hard absorbing 271 posts in a short amount of time). Nacho and Shii are my strongest town reads so far, both are actively scumhunting and analyzing information accurately. I'm also getting the feeling that Brian is town, he has a lot of reasoning behind his actions, and his analyses have been better than I would expect for a newbie. I get the vibe that Flammus is town too based off of his posts alone, but that gambit in the beginning by Mail still makes me a little suspicious. I'm not sure exactly what to think of Titus, some actions seem pro-town, some seem anti-town, null on this one. Verbs, null-scum in my opinion, seems suspicious because of the supposed reasoning behind Mail's gambit, but that's not enough to make me too suspicious of him. I'm suspicious of JKMatthews and notscience the most, JKM because of the situation with Mail's replacement and asking for a lynch, and notscience because of low levels of activity and not much reasoning behind the vote for Shii.
Reading backwards and I came across this, so...
Vote: phok
For the moment.
This is filled with uncertainty, this post...."yeah, I'm not sure, it seems this way, but yeah some don't seem that way, but yeah those posts are X, but yeah...." you get my drift
It's way too roundabout and makes no sense, it's like this person is trying so hard to look down
you were aggressive w/me about me being wrong about you, you showed some good paranoia (not Maki paranoia) about universal townread being town, he actually WAS town, and you backed off at the right time.
Why, and why are you now "completely reassured" about notscience?
I think you're scum because your reads list was extremely safe. Reads that are controversial (Titus and Verbs) are put as null and null-scum, you sheeped reasoning on JKM to a T and you had some weak suspicion on NS for "inactivity" which, as he noted, was completely inaccurate. Even your townread on Flammus (town on his play, scummy on the gambit) pretty much reflects public opinion. Generate some original content.
Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2013 3:17 pm
by Nachomamma8
In post 337, Bert wrote:Oh dear Nacho, you deceptive little rascal, you are here warping people’s minds aren’t you, AREN’T YOU
In post 272, phokdapolees wrote:Pertaining to the actual game, I just finished catching up on everything, and here's what I think so far (forgive me if I mix up facts or something like that, it's hard absorbing 271 posts in a short amount of time). Nacho and Shii are my strongest town reads so far, both are actively scumhunting and analyzing information accurately. I'm also getting the feeling that Brian is town, he has a lot of reasoning behind his actions, and his analyses have been better than I would expect for a newbie. I get the vibe that Flammus is town too based off of his posts alone, but that gambit in the beginning by Mail still makes me a little suspicious. I'm not sure exactly what to think of Titus, some actions seem pro-town, some seem anti-town, null on this one. Verbs, null-scum in my opinion, seems suspicious because of the supposed reasoning behind Mail's gambit, but that's not enough to make me too suspicious of him. I'm suspicious of JKMatthews and notscience the most, JKM because of the situation with Mail's replacement and asking for a lynch, and notscience because of low levels of activity and not much reasoning behind the vote for Shii.
Reading backwards and I came across this, so...
Vote: phok
For the moment.
This is filled with uncertainty, this post...."yeah, I'm not sure, it seems this way, but yeah some don't seem that way, but yeah those posts are X, but yeah...." you get my drift
It's way too roundabout and makes no sense, it's like this person is trying so hard to look down
And are you certain that I'm mafia? No, nothing is certain, especially on day 1, so to call me out for simply stating my opinions is wrong. And I really wasn't even that "uncertain" in that post in the first place.
Why, and why are you now "completely reassured" about notscience?
I think you're scum because your reads list was extremely safe. Reads that are controversial (Titus and Verbs) are put as null and null-scum, you sheeped reasoning on JKM to a T and you had some weak suspicion on NS for "inactivity" which, as he noted, was completely inaccurate. Even your townread on Flammus (town on his play, scummy on the gambit) pretty much reflects public opinion. Generate some original content.
So then why didn't you call me out earlier for it instead of waiting until now, way after that list was made? All I was doing in that post was stating my opinions, maybe some of them were aligned with the majority, but that was all what I thought so far.
Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2013 3:20 pm
by notscience
VOTE: phok
L-1 folks, I want to see some intent.
Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2013 3:20 pm
by Bert
GUT READS UPON FIRST QUICK QUICK RE-READ
notscience town
Brian guy TOWN TOWN TOWN
Titus don't like
the shiidaji (sp) person town
verbs null
nacho TBD
don't like phok
Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2013 3:24 pm
by Bert
Don't worry, guys and gals, we are gonna find two scumheads to decapitate!
let's go for DA WIN!
@Phok: re-do your reads list now and tell us who your top two choices for lynch are.
Do it now. OR else.
Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2013 3:30 pm
by notscience
Who let me nacho and bert be town together again
Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2013 3:31 pm
by Nachomamma8
In post 344, phokdapolees wrote:So then why didn't you call me out earlier for it instead of waiting until now, way after that list was made? All I was doing in that post was stating my opinions, maybe some of them were aligned with the majority, but that was all what I thought so far.
I called you out for a past post because I no longer wanted to lynch the JKM slot. Did you expect me not to reanalyze my reads? Did you expect your post to be safe from scrutiny just because it was in the past?
