Page 14 of 27
Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 2:41 am
by Wisdom
I would much rather if the three of you voted singer and we found someone to hammer her though. But I guess it isn't happening.
Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 2:45 am
by Guyett
VOTE: singer
for the lols...
I'm going to get lynched anyway
Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 2:51 am
by ObsessedWithCats
I suppose three informative votes and 2 semi-informative ones works. And he's far from my townest read.
VOTE: Guyett
L - 1. We have four hours. I'm not voting IV when he's not claimed, and I can't see any other wagons reaching a lynch in the time we have.
Edit: I'll have another look at singer when I finish taking notes on this textbook, and switch if my thoughts change, but I can't see myself reading her scummier than Guyett. Probably too much chance involved for the IV wagon to be anything worse than incautious.
Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 2:53 am
by Wisdom
Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 3:02 am
by ObsessedWithCats
At most 2 PRs out of 7 good guys, I think 1 claimed VT (maybe 2) gives fairly low odds of lynching a PR that way. Though thinking about it like that it is a pretty good scum tactic (if no one notices) to start a wagon on someone who probably wont be around to defend themself - better than going for a claimed VT or someone who's around a lot so they could claim if necessary.
UNVOTE
I'll be back before the deadline with a decision. My notes are priority but they wont take four hours.
Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 3:07 am
by Wisdom
It's not only the chance of lynching a PR. Even if IV claims VT or even flips VT, scum then can limit their kill to the unclaimed and have a greater chance of hitting a PR.
Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 3:25 am
by Nobody Special
Votecount 1.13
Guyett - 3 - RachMarie, Evil Regals, innocentvillager
innocentvillager - 2 - singersigner, RayFrost
singersigner - 2 - Wisdom, Guyett
ObsessedWithCats - 1 - ArcAngel9
Not Voting: ObsessedWithCats
With 9 alive, it takes 5 to lynch.
Deadline: (expired on 2013-10-19 13:54:09)
Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 4:00 am
by RayFrost
Unvote, Vote: Guyett
I don't like it, but it's the best option given the unwillingness to vote my scumread.
Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 4:03 am
by Guyett
You're scum aren;t you Ray.
Don't really feel the AtE
Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 4:04 am
by Wisdom
He probably is
Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 4:05 am
by Wisdom
Didn't even comment on the singer wagon, possibly buddies
Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 4:20 am
by singersigner
Lol, trust me, if I was confident enough in you being scum, I could've easily gotten you lynched. I think IV is a better way to go because of you're scum, you'll eat it anyway. I mean, Guyett brings up a good point about how you're just throwing shit out there, yet you think that's what I've been doing?
Can you point out where you explain what's different was out me pushing a deadline lynch versus you, because I'm trying to read your post on my phone and don't see it.
I also like how you dismiss both "scummy" behavior with laziness or apathetic town, as well as "admittedly scummy" behavior as town meta.
Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 4:26 am
by Wisdom
Nothing IV did was scummy, which makes your push terrible and opportunistic due to rayfrost's claim that he would be willing to lynch him.
My pushes were and are due to legitimate reasons and cannot compare to your "omg fluff no content, must be scum". You know better than that to deadline push an unclaimed for such bullshit reasons.
Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 4:30 am
by singersigner
Lol, appeal to authority much? There are perfect valid reasons for a deadline lynch, and perfect laid reasons for not needing a claim at deadline.
And how do you feel about Guyett's opportunistic jump onto IV and then myself?
Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 4:31 am
by Guyett
someone fucking hammer me and let the game move forward tomorrow when you have time to sort this shit out
Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 4:35 am
by Wisdom
Don't care about it, he knows he's getting lynched so he can't do much.
No,your reasons are beyond terrible and do not warrant a lynch, much less a lynch without a claim. Millions of town have exhibited similar behavior due to apathy or lack of time in the past and they were still town. The sole reason you pushed him for a deadline lynch was because you knew you would have support and you could possibly get a third claim.
Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 4:37 am
by Guyett
Don't make me hammer myself guys...
Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 4:38 am
by singersigner
In post 332, RayFrost wrote:Unvote, Vote: Guyett
I don't like it, but it's the best option given the unwillingness to vote my scumread.
vote: Guyett
Preview Edit:
You know...I always tend to me forgiving of such insufferable play because there's always a possibility that they're scum...just keep that in mind if you're town, please, because this wouldn't be the first time you've been unbearably and stubbornly wrong about something.
Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 4:40 am
by Wisdom
And now she ends the discussion by hammering. You're so dead tomorrow
Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 4:40 am
by singersigner
Be*
Also, I'd like to know what specifically made me in any way town to you. I never did ask you, since you said I was "losing hold" or something. Just a funny thing to say when I've been absent for a week...
In any case, it's noted that you turned on the first person willing to call you out on your bullshit.
Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 4:41 am
by singersigner
HEY WISDOM DEADLINE IS IN AN HOUR AND IM IN MY PHONE.
Seriously...
It's almost funny how threatened you feel...
Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 4:43 am
by singersigner
Also, if you're truly town, I'd like you to turn down the confirmation bias a little. That loses game for more than just yourself.
Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 4:44 am
by singersigner
And look how little the discussion has ended...
Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 4:44 am
by singersigner
Ok that one was uncalled for, lol.
Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 4:44 am
by Wisdom
You don't even read the game, I explained that in my first posts
Pedit: deadline was in 2 hours and I would have hammered him if we didn't have enough people for your lynch. But no, you had to hammer