Posted: Tue Apr 22, 2014 6:12 am
i just updated my wiki. in my last 13 games i am 1-12.
1) The point wasn't the individual usage. It's the corpus of the post. Even I use unnecessary adverbs and fail to contract sometimes, and I edit my posts for those things fairly aggressively.In post 302, Nachomamma8 wrote:#2738: This is feeding into confirmation bias based o n pretty much nothing. Muffin uses "actually" a lot. He used "I will" once. None of this is motivation behind actions, none of this considers alignment.
#2764: Interpreting a player's posts literally and assigning scum motivation to it is generally bad for obvious reasons.
Tree stump conversation is useless, but isn't carnival of lunacy.
Conversation with ffery is a sign of not liking the conclusion, dismissing the conversation completely.
Before this point, there was a good portion of sheer rhetoric and literally nothing else.
I'm on something like a 7 or 8 game losing streak on my solo account right now.
Nati's point is bad.In post 313, Nachomamma8 wrote:This streak of posts was Nati and was before the frustration.Rancid Broderick Drake wrote:Like, not only was SSK's temper tantrum super town, but mastin is excited and hyped about this game in some measure--which was, believe it or not, my intention in dragging her sorry ass into that hydra anyway. And I'm appealing to real life, but i don't think mastin would be able to be this enthusiastic about the game given the mental health issues if everyone was right. Like, I know this is a horrible argument but I'm very well-in-touch with emotional thinking.
But haven't re-analyzed anything nor did you show a willingness to.In post 271, Nachomamma8 wrote:At least I'm willing to reanalyze them. You aren't willing to reanalyze. Bro won't reanalyze. f-16 won't reanalyze. Etc, etc.In post 268, Desperado wrote:^cuz if your actions at deadline are any indication your reads are pretty shitty anyway, so
It would have nice if you spent actual effort talking to people like you usually do instead of passing blame. You claim that Muffin is a lost cause and he is the one whose actions you passionately defend.In post 279, Nachomamma8 wrote:I know Muffin is a lost cause. Muffin is very self-absorbed at times, he stirs up shit and he doesn't really care about stirring up shit. Other people in your hydra normally can be dragged out of vitriol lane before everything gets too horrible.
Okay, and telling Muffin to stop insulting half the playerlist might have led to a more calm day. Why didn't you consider it?In post 282, Nachomamma8 wrote:that wasn't a fair statement, you're correctIn post 280, Desperado wrote:if you believe that yesterday wasn't conducive to determining anyone's alignment why were you trying to redirect the discussion on to your reads just now?In post 277, Nachomamma8 wrote:BRO doesn't have an anxiety attack? We have a yesterday that's actually beneficial to determining the alignments of anyone?
yesterday wasn't a day where reads were formed in a fun way. reads were formed by reading emotional breakdowns and reading people who are literally far past their limit, which isn't a fun way to form reads (which is what i mean by an unhealthy gamestate).
This is fake because it doesn't make any sense and here's why:In post 314, Nachomamma8 wrote:This is frustration I'm referring to and townreading: it is muffin's frustration, not Nati's.Rancid Broderick Drake wrote:I would actually like to be lynched (just because I literally do not want town to win this, which is why I'm stepping back and giving full control of play to Nati because I cannot play to win con)
And then I would like for mastin to be lynched after us just so town is in a really shit position
I have told Nati what he should do if he still cares about winning - it's a cheap tactic (and i don't think it's a rule violation but i told him to check with cabd before he does it), but if you still think we're scum after it happens, you literally have no idea how to scum hunt
If you have any sense you'll wait to see whether he decides to do what I told him to do. I don't care either way, though.
Except Tammy and I were analyzing the game and moving it forward. Mastin and AP were shittalking. A rational human being isn't ever going to prefer Mastin's/AP's back and forth over ours. Nati is a rational human being.In post 316, Nachomamma8 wrote:first, i don't think nati preferring ap and mastin over f-16 is anymore significant than f-16 liking you over ap and mastinIn post 315, Desperado wrote:nati showed up and blamed f-16 and titan for causing her eyes to bleed and hailing ap and mastin for their brevity.
F-16, can you post this over and over again tomorrow?In post 330, F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:3) He spent an extraordinary amount of effort into avoiding his lynch which if he really gave up, he wouldn't have.
didn't RBD already say they weren't intending to play the game seriouslyIn post 318, Nachomamma8 wrote:here's why i wouldn't care: muffin normally gets more serious when people vote him
i get more serious when people vote me (see: xenogears, too many heads) and i think a lot of players are that way regardless of alignment so
trololololololololoIn post 347, borkjerfkin wrote:But hey actually having one role flip with information is a welcome fucking change from that one game that just ended *grumble fewfhkjewwdjhefkl*