re: notty
it's fine if you wanna keep doing that but when you get tired of doing it please sign your posts
and don't say im stupid, im actually stupid
re: the miller business
forget it
please
im sorry i even brought it up
re: PFoS vs CB
i don't like CB being so lynch-happy, see 94 / 158 or that slight push on notty pr
but i don't really see the exchange as TvS, it reads more TvT (esp. "god i hope u are scum" stuff)
re: maxous/itlepip/spiffeh
i dont really see anything alignment indicative in that exchange apart from spiffeh's vroom vroom push on itle (i kinda like the IC votes, so obv reaction bait)
re: varsoon
why would you complain about other people posting a lot
so atm i wanna
FoS: CB, Spiffeh
VOTE: Suzune
that is all.
(by the court jester's decree)
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2015 4:02 am
by Maxous
↑3dicerolling wrote:Maxous's TLDR says that it appears Spiffeh is just trying to paint Itlepip as scum rather than determine his alignment. Spiffeh tells Maxous his main, (and from what I read)only point against Itlepip, and Maxous believes it is a good point. I don't think it makes sense to believe the only point on the wagon is good, and still believe it's only goal is to paint someone else as scum.
go back to #227
I layed out that Spiffeh misrepped a very reasonable reaction from itlepip
Spiffeh
retroactively
made a point about itlepip that I can agree with.
not the same thing
to answer: would probably lean-scum with how weakly he dropped the miller issue.
"hey guys should we make a thing out of this? no? no..? errr ok, lemme quietly drop the issue >.> "
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2015 4:11 am
by Maxous
regarding CB vs Sunshine hydra - CB is looking a lot better out of the exchanges
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2015 4:14 am
by pirate mollie
↑Maxous wrote:regarding CB vs Sunshine hydra - CB is looking a lot better out of the exchanges
↑Maxous wrote:regarding CB vs Sunshine hydra - CB is looking a lot better out of the exchanges
explain
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2015 4:48 am
by Maxous
CB has made an active effort to engage and understand where your reads are coming while your side of the interactions have been standoffish and overly vague
it's far easier to see where CB is coming from and TBQH i'm having a hard time fully understanding why you have the reads you do because they were *not* explained clearly
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2015 6:57 am
by PocketFullofSunshine
↑Maxous wrote:CB has made an active effort to engage and understand where your reads are coming while your side of the interactions have been standoffish and overly vague
it's far easier to see where CB is coming from and TBQH i'm having a hard time fully understanding why you have the reads you do because they were *not* explained clearly
I just wanna get this straight.
So lying about meta which hey! you can check for yourself and dodging my question and omgus voting are your examples of "active engagement and understanding of the game???????
[] yes
[] no
cos I will never measure up to your standards then since I have a town role pm.
btw, I think ank wld try to talk to me more but he isn't is he.
since when has a neg utility claim EVER been a towntell to you?
it wasn't in doa.
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2015 7:44 am
by CharlotteBebe
alright.
pocket wrote:So lying about meta which hey! you can check for yourself and dodging my question and omgus voting are your examples of "active engagement and understanding of the game???????
do tell how im lying about meta.
because lying is a very strong word. and me saying that i read part of your iso and saw your push on titus in that game and noted how it was similarly devoid of content as your push on me has been this game is pretty farfetched to push as a lie.
or are you saying that i didnt read the ff game? in which case you would have to think as scum, im a moron who would lie about actually reading something. which im not.
i think you pushing this lying angle is fucking nasty.
and im really just leaning that youre trying to emanate your town meta of aggressive headbutting except here it comes across way harder like a caricature of that play, rather than anything actually genuine. theres no engagement on your end. youre just reaching the conclusion and then pushing it without even having tried to probe for motivation behind our play.
what question am i dodging?
how in the world am i just omgusing?
i was initially a little hesitant in wanting to push this because i know i find it hard to read people when theyre pushing me, but taking a step back for a day and seeing mollie continue to push angles that just arent at all based in anything just make me feel like shes full of shit here.
and ank feels similarly so yay!
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2015 7:46 am
by CharlotteBebe
anti can you vote pocket?
can anyone townreading pocket please actually read what shes pushing right now and tell me how it's not coming from scum?
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2015 7:47 am
by CharlotteBebe
like seriously,
pockets last post is the biggest load of hot air.
theres literally nothing behind anything shes saying there.
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2015 7:50 am
by pirate mollie
↑CharlotteBebe wrote:like seriously,
pockets last post is the biggest load of hot air.
theres literally nothing behind anything shes saying there.
YOU ARE LYING ABOUT MY META
THAT IS SCUMMY AS FUCK
IT IS WHAT I DO WHEN I AM SCUM
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2015 7:52 am
by pirate mollie
you what
fuck this shit
I cannot handle another game where anti is a total dick and lynches me on d1