Page 14 of 257

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 12:49 pm
by Almost50
In post 306, Dunnstral wrote:Alright let me break this one down for you

[Titus, Lapsa]
[Boem_u_dusi, implosion, Wake88]
[Nosferatu, Performer, Varsoon, Mirhawk]
[Airick10, Agar, podoboq, PeregrineV, shannon]
[Transcend, Almost50]
[Zachstralkita, Sickofit1138]

Right. Now let ME break it down for you:

[Titus, Lapsa]
[Boem_u_dusi, implosion,
Wake88
]
[
Nosferatu
, Performer, Varsoon, Mirhawk]
[Airick10, Agar,
podoboq
, PeregrineV,
shannon
]
[
Transcend
,
Almost50
]
[
Zachstralkita
,
Sickofit1138
]

In just 26 posts you voted 6 & stated suspicion of 2 = 8 total players thus far. Those you voted are marked in
red
, and those you FoS'd but didn't vote in
blue
.

P.S. Before you ask: Your in response to Titus implies you ARE scum reading Wake, but can't vote him bc you only have one vote. You didn't say something along the lines of "I'm not scum reading him" or "I'm not sure about him" either. You implied willingness to vote there if you could.

As for Nos:
In post 171, Dunnstral wrote:Probably because your reads suck
and/or you're mafia
hardly suggests you're town reading him too.

I can hardly see 6 scum in the setup (unless it's MB which I have no means to decide whether it is the case or not). 6 is too much IMHO, and 8 is like you're suspecting 42% of the player list already.

You know what? I'll leave you be for now. You do as you wish. Just letting you know that spreading suspicion about as many players is a scumtell of my own (i.e. I'm scum reading you now for that particular reason, as it looks like you just want to lynch someone regardless).

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 12:51 pm
by Almost50
Oh, and just for the record: You've totally ignored me on the PV wagon (not that anyone else acknowledged it, but still..) despite the fact he's right between two of your previously vote targets on your reads.

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 12:56 pm
by Zachstralkita
Almost50 wrote:
In post 306, Dunnstral wrote:Alright let me break this one down for you

[Titus, Lapsa]
[Boem_u_dusi, implosion, Wake88]
[Nosferatu, Performer, Varsoon, Mirhawk]
[Airick10, Agar, podoboq, PeregrineV, shannon]
[Transcend, Almost50]
[Zachstralkita, Sickofit1138]

Right. Now let ME break it down for you:

[Titus, Lapsa]
[Boem_u_dusi, implosion,
Wake88
]
[
Nosferatu
, Performer, Varsoon, Mirhawk]
[Airick10, Agar,
podoboq
, PeregrineV,
shannon
]
[
Transcend
,
Almost50
]
[
Zachstralkita
,
Sickofit1138
]

In just 26 posts you voted 6 & stated suspicion of 2 = 8 total players thus far. Those you voted are marked in
red
, and those you FoS'd but didn't vote in
blue
.

P.S. Before you ask: Your in response to Titus implies you ARE scum reading Wake, but can't vote him bc you only have one vote. You didn't say something along the lines of "I'm not scum reading him" or "I'm not sure about him" either. You implied willingness to vote there if you could.

As for Nos:
In post 171, Dunnstral wrote:Probably because your reads suck
and/or you're mafia
hardly suggests you're town reading him too.

I can hardly see 6 scum in the setup (unless it's MB which I have no means to decide whether it is the case or not). 6 is too much IMHO, and 8 is like you're suspecting 42% of the player list already.

You know what? I'll leave you be for now. You do as you wish. Just letting you know that spreading suspicion about as many players is a scumtell of my own (i.e. I'm scum reading you now for that particular reason, as it looks like you just want to lynch someone regardless).
That post was beautifully executed, but you deciding to "let him go"... is a bit dismaying and defeats the purpose, no?

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 1:15 pm
by Almost50
"for now" is a key word in the context, my friend ;)

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 1:23 pm
by podoboq
325 - 328 makes me like both of these players a lot more.

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 1:53 pm
by Dunnstral
I don't like 325 because:

I never suspected Wake
I never suspected Nosferatu
My vote on podoboq was clearly an rvs wagon vote
My stuff on shannon is only if Zach is mafia

You can say I implied whatever but it's not true

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 1:54 pm
by Zachstralkita
Dunnstral wrote: My stuff on shannon is only if Zach is mafia
Must be wrong then.

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 2:01 pm
by Transcend
God that Shannon philosophy is stupid as fuck.

Let's rope boem, imo.

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 2:05 pm
by Almost50
In post 330, Dunnstral wrote:I don't like 325 because:

I never suspected Wake
I never suspected Nosferatu
My vote on podoboq was clearly an rvs wagon vote
My stuff on shannon is only if Zach is mafia

You can say I implied whatever but it's not true
Not gonna address the first 2 bc I've already said what I want to say in that post.

Regarding podoq, you voted him then shannon then him again. It was the only time you voted shannon too, although you did state suspicion of her later on. So, are you telling me that your podoq-shannon-podoq were RVS? how about your Trabscend-Transcend double vote? Were these RVS or serious??

In fact, since you were kind enough to provide a full read list I would very much appreciate a line or two explaining each read. Why are Titus/Lapsa townier than Boem, Implosion & Wake? What links do you see between the "bottom six" (using term with a grain of salt) that makes you think some of them are scum with eachother?

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 2:07 pm
by Almost50
In post 332, Transcend wrote:Let's rope boem, imo.
Wait for Dunn's response, please. We may have better lynching options depending on the contents of said response.

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 2:08 pm
by Transcend
Dunn is a tough read for me.

I genuinely sr Boem.

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 2:32 pm
by Dunnstral
In post 334, Almost50 wrote:
In post 332, Transcend wrote:Let's rope boem, imo.
Wait for Dunn's response, please. We may have better lynching options depending on the contents of said response.
Why do you need my response if you've already said this :roll:

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 2:33 pm
by Dunnstral
In post 333, Almost50 wrote:
In post 330, Dunnstral wrote:I don't like 325 because:

I never suspected Wake
I never suspected Nosferatu
My vote on podoboq was clearly an rvs wagon vote
My stuff on shannon is only if Zach is mafia

You can say I implied whatever but it's not true
Not gonna address the first 2 bc I've already said what I want to say in that post.

Regarding podoq, you voted him then shannon then him again. It was the only time you voted shannon too, although you did state suspicion of her later on. So, are you telling me that your podoq-shannon-podoq were RVS? how about your Trabscend-Transcend double vote? Were these RVS or serious??

In fact, since you were kind enough to provide a full read list I would very much appreciate a line or two explaining each read. Why are Titus/Lapsa townier than Boem, Implosion & Wake? What links do you see between the "bottom six" (using term with a grain of salt) that makes you think some of them are scum with eachother?
Shannon and pobo both ignored me early

Transcend serious vote

Titus/Lapsa are town because I said so

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 2:56 pm
by Zachstralkita
In post 337, Dunnstral wrote: Titus/Lapsa are town because I said so
I told you he gets excited.

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 4:14 pm
by Almost50
What the FROG!! So, ignoring you = scum?? Bc you say so is town?? And your # is ridiculous and scummy on it's own. re-read what I said. I said "we may have better lynching options" but never specified whom these might be. For you to take to mean I already intended to vote YOU is basically a subconscious scum!claim. You could've provided "something" for me to read through and decide if it's convincing AT ALL.

Sorry, mate.. but you're obv!scum to me right now.

VOTE: Dunn

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 4:21 pm
by podoboq
In post 339, Almost50 wrote:VOTE: Dunn
I would be OK with this. He says he voted me because I ignored him early, but I didn't have a real conversation with anyone in the game until today.

Not the only thing he's said that's scummy, but it's a bulletpoint I wanted to point out.

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 5:10 pm
by GuyInFreezer
The VC will be more frequent during Monday~Wednesday, when I have no work/no stuff to do.


vc 1.04
Wake88 (1):
AGar
Zachstralkita (5):
shannon, Nosferatu, Dunnstral, Titus, Performer
Sickofit1138 (4):
PeregrineV, Boem_u_dusi, Mirhawk, podoboq
Mirhawk (1):
Sickofit1138
Boem_u_dusi (2):
Transcend, implosion
shannon (1):
Zachstralkita
Dunnstral (1):
Almost50

Not Voting:
Airick10, Wake88, Varsoon, Lapsa


With
19
votes,
10
to lynch.
Deadline: (expired on 2016-07-05 23:38:55)


Airick10 is
V/LA
until
6/27
.

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 5:35 pm
by Dunnstral
In post 10, Dunnstral wrote:Yeah uh

Next person to ignore my post 8 by not voting podo or me is getting voted, fair warning
Hey man I gave fair warning
Almost50 wrote:So, ignoring you = scum??
I never said that
Almost50 wrote:For you to take to mean I already intended to vote YOU
What are you talking about? Again, I never said that (whatever it means.)

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 5:53 pm
by Zachstralkita
@mod A50 is voting Dunn :)

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 6:09 pm
by Zachstralkita
VOTE: Dunnstral

Let's see if we can coerce you to use more than " because I said so " as a reason for anything.

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 6:16 pm
by Titus
Hmmm interesting wagon states

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 7:24 pm
by Lapsa
In post 309, podoboq wrote: ^ bad
^ bad

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 7:39 pm
by Lapsa
I got Macho role modifier

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 7:54 pm
by Dunnstral
:facepalm:

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 8:00 pm
by Titus
In post 347, Lapsa wrote:I got Macho role modifier
I love this gambit. Me too.