Mafiascum.net

In post 321, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 315, profii wrote:

In post 303, Nictis wrote:

In post 302, profii wrote: So I’m giving him a chance here. I guess his gambit is make himself so untrustable he gets himself copped and has the luxury of being conf town until scum decide we can’t have a conf town in the game.

Idk but overall if you are intentionally putting yourself in the position of “you are all so unsure of me you need to cop me” then I am guessing town

But idk because that is the weirdest claim

Eh, even if it is just a joke claim (Which I hear he does on a regular basis) it's one that makes it a bit more unlikely for him to get copped. Plenty of other people for the cop to check instead of the guy who's saying he can't be investigated or will turn up guilty if he is.

Right now I mostly don't like how he claimed that I was saying something I never did.

yea the last sentence of my post is me agreeing with all of your post

I get to a point where I think if I keep lynching FLs fake claims then it beccomes
Policy: stop FL being an idiot

It’s the particular role that really bugs me on this one but I want to leave him alone, it’s like a scab you’re not supposed to pick !

I s2g you guys are all out of your gourds. I know why he claimed it and it was to poke fun at me. Stop obsessing over a meme.

I don't care much for the claim, but he still tried to discredit me for no discernible reason. The joke caught my attention, his response holds it. Check post 69.

@Egg - Okay, I apologize for the salt. Maybe it's just that I'm hardwired to take it personally when someone is up in my business when I'm doing work scumhunting. You do come off as Town to me, I just didn't find your questions especially useful. Most of them were fairly self-evident. If you can pare it down to just a couple of meaningful queries, I'll reply.

In post 325, Nictis wrote:

In post 321, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 315, profii wrote:

In post 303, Nictis wrote:

In post 302, profii wrote: So I’m giving him a chance here. I guess his gambit is make himself so untrustable he gets himself copped and has the luxury of being conf town until scum decide we can’t have a conf town in the game.

Idk but overall if you are intentionally putting yourself in the position of “you are all so unsure of me you need to cop me” then I am guessing town

But idk because that is the weirdest claim

Eh, even if it is just a joke claim (Which I hear he does on a regular basis) it's one that makes it a bit more unlikely for him to get copped. Plenty of other people for the cop to check instead of the guy who's saying he can't be investigated or will turn up guilty if he is.

Right now I mostly don't like how he claimed that I was saying something I never did.

yea the last sentence of my post is me agreeing with all of your post

I get to a point where I think if I keep lynching FLs fake claims then it beccomes
Policy: stop FL being an idiot

It’s the particular role that really bugs me on this one but I want to leave him alone, it’s like a scab you’re not supposed to pick !

I s2g you guys are all out of your gourds. I know why he claimed it and it was to poke fun at me. Stop obsessing over a meme.

I don't care much for the claim, but he still tried to discredit me for no discernible reason. The joke caught my attention, his response holds it. Check post 69.

idk like his logic seems fine to me in that post. He's basically saying "you think xyz is what you would do so it's what I would do, but it's not".

In post 320, Egg wrote:Nosferatu, read my post. I don't like his focus on Boon and nothing else. The vote itself felt opportunistic and fake and all he's done is harp on that.

yeah i can read i knew that
i was asking why you voted him over pine when pine had more votes on him

In post 319, Inferno390 wrote:I could low-key swear that this is a PR softclaim.

you're supposed to save that for the scum pt fam

In post 327, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 325, Nictis wrote: I don't care much for the claim, but he still tried to discredit me for no discernible reason. The joke caught my attention, his response holds it. Check post 69.

idk like his logic seems fine to me in that post. He's basically saying "you think xyz is what you would do so it's what I would do, but it's not".

Except that absolutely none of what he posted applied to my own post?

In post 69, Flavor Leaf wrote:

In post 32, Nictis wrote: Ascetic Miller. That's... Interesting.

So if I'm reading this right and not mixing up terms, you're claiming to come up guilty to investigations, and that anyone who visits you will be roleblocked (Including investigators)

and

you are sharing a chat with someone.

So... Why shouldn't I think you're mafia here?
VOTE: Flavor Leaf

This is projecty and false advertising. I don’t really know what i mean when I say false advertising. But this is it.

VOTE: Nicitis

Basically, they’re saying exactly what is the “right” way of playing, and using it in terms of pushing without taking in facts otherwise.

I’m not strong on this, and I’ll likely change my mind next page, but I want to see where it goes. I need a better sense of who Nic is before I go too hard.

What part of saying what his claim meant is false advertising? What part of voting him for a contradictory claim is projecting? How is calling someone out on bullshit telling them the "right" way to play mafia? And 'pushing without taking in facts otherwise' is an awfully interesting thing to say I'm doing when I show what his claim means, and in the post that I quoted he said he wasn't going to provide any other info?

Instead of responding to my question, he lied about what I said and put both suspicion and a vote on me. Painting suspicion on someone who calls you out on a fakeclaim doesn't seem like a very innocent thing to do does it?

@Egg - yeah, that’s two for you. Annoying, isn’t it?

I'll take being an annoying player who catches scum.

In post 263, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 262, TwoInAMillion wrote:

In post 256, Flavor Leaf wrote:@Gamma - Answering to the Flubber question, I can see Flubber doing that as town, and for some reason I always town read Flubber. He’s one of the players I misread the most on site. But yes, it is very similar to that game.

@Egg - that’s just what Two does. He votes me. I’ve never played with scumTwo, I might have once, and I was inactive the majority of that game and he died before I was in really, but this is the same townTwo I always want to lynch.

You're not scumhunting. And you're not giving me a good reason not to vote you.

The content of the quoted post and 2iam's response pings me. 2iam should know why, he shouts about it any time he gets pushed

2iam you haven't responded to this yet

Flavor is listening about being caught scum.

Whining

In post 331, Flavor Leaf wrote:@Egg - yeah, that’s two for you. Annoying, isn’t it?

so a read on two and nictis is all you got outta that gambit earlier?
Where are you on nictis now?

Don't dodge the question.

I don't see a question mark anywhere

Let me rephrase then:
What do you think is wrong with your push on Flavor?

In post 297, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:

In post 203, Flubbernugget wrote:Anyway, everyone with the exception of Firebringer and flavor seems town atm.

Maaaaybe Gamma scum too? Didn't actually check is links to see what he's going on about

No one did

He's not doing much and has enough experience as scum to be able to do a post by post analysis imo. That's the majority of what he's done. My biggest reservation is that Gamma's always been kinda lynchbait-y

I wanted to do links because I didn't want a massive quote wall, but no one pays attention to links it seems. Unfortunately as I said a wall will also make people ignore my thoughts, and multiple individual quotes will come off as spam. So I guess my verdict on the new playstyle is that there is no good way to engage people with my thoughts.

[align=][/align]

In post 312, Nosferatu wrote:what would we call it?

Something witty about our propensity just to correct things rather than play

In post 341, Gamma Emerald wrote:I wanted to do links because I didn't want a massive quote wall, but no one pays attention to links it seems. Unfortunately as I said a wall will also make people ignore my thoughts, and multiple individual quotes will come off as spam. So I guess my verdict on the new playstyle is that there is no good way to engage people with my thoughts.

Try summaries

I think north side might be scum btw

why is anyone voting nictis?

boon's vote is bullshit

In post 339, Gamma Emerald wrote:Let me rephrase then:
What do you think is wrong with your push on Flavor?

Nothing.

In post 336, Nosferatu wrote:

In post 331, Flavor Leaf wrote:@Egg - yeah, that’s two for you. Annoying, isn’t it?

so a read on two and nictis is all you got outta that gambit earlier?
Where are you on nictis now?

Nah, I got plenty of reads. Probably town.

In post 346, Nosferatu wrote:why is anyone voting nictis?

boon's vote is bullshit

I’m not voting Nictis