Mafiascum.net

So you're an Innocent Child then? I still would like your opinions in that case.

In post 323, Kaede Akamatsu wrote:Oh GIF's not around, now that comment ended up being kinda anti climatic.
I guess I'll have to prove my townyness later.

Well, I think I know what's coming up, so, in anticipation of the Innocent Child reveal that I'm sure you are talking about.

UNVOTE:

Ok my partner wants to pressure verylazy but don't all derail Ramcius please he's still scum and the more people who stay on him the less I gotta burn my mental energy to kill him.

This is Kaede she may or may not be scum but it's barely AI

Not sure how you think this is the most productive way to spend D1

In post 324, Alchemist21 wrote:

@Kaede

What are all your current thoughts on the game?

Havent changed from:

In post 300, Kaede Akamatsu wrote:It's more of im supposed to be a shining beacon of guidance.
And I feel more confused about what's going on.

Ok, since ppl dont seem to get the memo ill just hard claim IC.
There, now you can stop worrying about me.

In post 327, Ouroboros wrote:Ok my partner wants to pressure verylazy but don't all derail Ramcius please he's still scum and the more people who stay on him the less I gotta burn my mental energy to kill him.

I'm doubtful about him being scum at this point. The way he's explained his actions have made them understandable and I don't want to fall for lynchbait.

In post 327, Ouroboros wrote:Ok my partner wants to pressure verylazy but don't all derail Ramcius please he's still scum and the more people who stay on him the less I gotta burn my mental energy to kill him.

I was going back because I forgot the name of the scummy guy I was voting before. I have no name and no memory for names.

VOTE: Ramcius

Why would you do that

Why don't you trust me to protect you from being lynched

Alchemist it was never about what he did but about the scumminess of the rationale he provided for the Tchill read.

Having a plausible explanation for something doesn't make him locktown

What does it even matter, i've been softing it since my first post

Anyway, now that you know that, i feel more obligated to try to make sense of what's going on in this game.

You were never the NK, protectives would have been on me, easy game

Now I'm basically guaranteed N1

In post 333, Ouroboros wrote:Why would you do that

Why don't you trust me to protect you from being lynched

Alchemist it was never about what he did but about the scumminess of the rationale he provided for the Tchill read.

Having a plausible explanation for something doesn't make him locktown

I'm not calling him locktown, I'm just saying I can see how what he did could come from Town and it's nowhere near as scummy as I originally thought especially considering his record for getting himself mislynched D1.

In post 332, ManWithNoName wrote:

In post 327, Ouroboros wrote:Ok my partner wants to pressure verylazy but don't all derail Ramcius please he's still scum and the more people who stay on him the less I gotta burn my mental energy to kill him.

I was going back because I forgot the name of the scummy guy I was voting before. I have no name and no memory for names.

VOTE: Ramcius

10/10 post

In post 334, Kaede Akamatsu wrote:What does it even matter, i've been softing it since my first post

You don't need to soft a role that can be mod-confirmed. Lol

In post 337, Alchemist21 wrote:

In post 333, Ouroboros wrote:Why would you do that

Why don't you trust me to protect you from being lynched

Alchemist it was never about what he did but about the scumminess of the rationale he provided for the Tchill read.

Having a plausible explanation for something doesn't make him locktown

I'm not calling him locktown, I'm just saying I can see how what he did could come from Town and it's nowhere near as scummy as I originally thought especially considering his record for getting himself mislynched D1.

Do I need to go back and point out that in Timeshift and Kingdom Hearts I locktowned him very early while he was getting scumread by the whole playerlist?

Or can you take my word on that?

I have no issues reading lynchbait

@Ouroboros and Alchemist, I'm having trouble following this conversation. Who are you talking about?

@Rc, I can take your word for it that you read him correctly in a previous game. At this point I could switch back there if needed later in the Day but I'm seriously thinking he's lynchbait right now.

@Man, Ramcius.

On second thought I think I will go back on Ram for now. Half the reason I didn't want to unvote him earlier is because I don't have a better place for my vote right now and I still don't so I'll put it back just to keep up some pressure.

VOTE: Ramcius

In post 343, Alchemist21 wrote:On second thought I think I will go back on Ram for now. Half the reason I didn't want to unvote him earlier is because I don't have a better place for my vote right now and I still don't so I'll put it back just to keep up some pressure.

VOTE: Ramcius

It's not how pressure works - you don't tell people you vote just for pressure

also, why you townreading both millers and hider claimants?

What are the thoughts on Nero so far, by the way? I'm having a hard time really making what I am thinking (A scumlean) go from abstract thoughts to actual words.

In post 344, Ramcius wrote:

In post 343, Alchemist21 wrote:On second thought I think I will go back on Ram for now. Half the reason I didn't want to unvote him earlier is because I don't have a better place for my vote right now and I still don't so I'll put it back just to keep up some pressure.

VOTE: Ramcius

It's not how pressure works - you don't tell people you vote just for pressure

also, why you townreading both millers and hider claimants?

A lot of votes is still pressure, even if they know so. At best you're still null to me, I just don't see your actions as omgscum anymore.

I don't think Dave is the type of player to try to gambit with a Miller claim as scum. Wilky I keep waffling on and have decided to just let the game progress and try to reas him on non-Miller based stuff. I have my own line of reasoning for the Hider claim but I don't want to go into it right now.

VOTE: Ventriloquist

Actually can I get team support here this intrigues me

In post 345, ManWithNoName wrote:What are the thoughts on Nero so far, by the way? I'm having a hard time really making what I am thinking (A scumlean) go from abstract thoughts to actual words.

I think he looks worse after the 1v1 with Maria but I think they might have more to say to each other that will help solidify my thoughts there.

I don't think anyone has expressed that all of {TChill, Davesaz, and Wilky} are town.