Mafiascum.net

Why are you trying to game the rules?

Letting the mod sort this one out since his ruleset is what it is, but not a fan of what S_S is trying to do.

UNVOTE:

Pending resolution.

I hate when no lynch isn't 50% so day should end even though no lynch is the wrong play

Lynching rules should be consistent across all forms, imo. If you go with a majority, it should all be majority. If you go with plurality, it is what it is.

A majority for a lynch, 50% for no lynch, or no majority for no lynch is not an ideal rule. As I said, it is what it is...but the mod didn't even realize it, so I question the intent.

That said, whatever it is it is. I don't like S_S calling out a rule "infraction" without any other commentary though.

Well if he believes day should already be over it would be hypocritical of him to post content

Really? Damn that twilight posting.

oh fucking hell...mod doesn't even have a twilight rule so I can't be snarky about it.

It's different to twilight as the mod has posted a VC that should have ended the day, as far as he's concerned the thread should already be locked and we should be in night

In post 334, Not_Mafia wrote:It's different to twilight as the mod has posted a VC that should have ended the day, as far as he's concerned the thread should already be locked and we should be in night

Mod didn't end it though, and ultimately mod has discretion.

*sigh* this is a No lynch.

I'm resigned.

I'm not arguing about whether day should be ended or not, I'm saying I don't think it's scummy that S_S just posted the rule

In post 336, Not_Mafia wrote:I'm not arguing about whether day should be ended or not, I'm saying I don't think it's scummy that S_S just posted the rule

Mod errors/corrections (outside of V/LA) should usually be handled via PM. Less impact to the game.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯ shoulda coulda woulda

Obv. Changes nothing right now. Just a bit miffed.

In post 329, PenguinPower wrote:Lynching rules should be consistent across all forms, imo. If you go with a majority, it should all be majority. If you go with plurality, it is what it is.

A majority for a lynch, 50% for no lynch, or no majority for no lynch is not an ideal rule. As I said, it is what it is...but the mod didn't even realize it, so I question the intent.

If 50% of the players want a lynch, and 50% of the players want a no-lynch, then no lynch can be achieved. If no-lynch is achieved by majority, the people who want no-lynch will have to stall the day out until deadline.

In post 331, Not_Mafia wrote:Well if he believes day should already be over it would be hypocritical of him to post content

Yep.

The whole point of no-lynching on evens is to give scum as little information as possible.

Not arguing rules, their basis, or what's best. If you took issue with the mod, it should have been done privately.

Thanks.

Wasn't taking issue with anything, just alerting him to something I thought he might have missed.

You corrected the mod on their ruleset publicly. That should have been done privately.

Whatever. We're going into the night.

Can you lock the thread?

I just view it as alerting mod they missed a hammer

Ok...

Let's use our time to chat about cornstarch