Page 14 of 164
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2018 1:25 pm
by Raskolnikov
Hitalt have I played with your main btw
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2018 1:33 pm
by Raskolnikov
In post 176, brassherald wrote:I'm going to advertise how I've correctly scum read duckling very quickly at least one time.
So far, I've been okay with him.
He'll be obvtown by the end of day 1 if he's town, and I think he is
Actually kinda like this from brass regardless of duck
What little I know from games I've read supports this as likely true (the he should get obvtown if town part, I think it's too soon to actually judge though) and my experience is most scum don't feel comfortable straight vouching for their partner like this even if duck turns out scum
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2018 1:52 pm
by Raskolnikov
In post 196, MagnaofIllusion wrote:@Rask
- why did you try to suggest my observation about Inferno was a criticism when it was an attempt to see if others would vouch for what looked like a deliberate play style and see who responded?
Huge tangents of twisted logic does read critical, though there admittedly there is the distinction of saying the logic is bad and making any AI judgment based on it.
Questioning for meta is valid but the phrasing there read a bit exaggerated so I wondered if maybe part of that may have been asked to discredit or make him look bad.
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2018 2:04 pm
by Raskolnikov
Dramonic posting strikes me as very cagey here
Has to go into more why the progression by inferno is fake given I don't think anyone else sees ingame agrees (gustavo having had problem with inferno on something entirely different)
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2018 2:09 pm
by Raskolnikov
Actually elbirn kinda did though he dropped it
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2018 2:18 pm
by Raskolnikov
VOTE: skygazer
flub wagon is okay but kinda whatever
Sky I think is closest here to pushing an agenda given the conclusions don't make sense to me and feel forced
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2018 3:20 pm
by Elbirn
What have I done? I'm having difficulty parsing your posts and I don't know if it's just me or idk
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2018 3:31 pm
by Inferno390
He means that one point you said my posts felt fake.
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2018 3:39 pm
by Raskolnikov
No I get that sometimes (difficulty to parse)
It was in referring to
328 but I remembered your spoiler posting on inferno
As a side note I probably should have joined a geriatric or something, have to get used to this pace here (also the number of names to keep track of)
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2018 3:40 pm
by Inferno390
I'm not really sure what to say now that the thread has more or less died. I'm gonna probably ISO a few people and see if I can form some early reads and generate some discussion.
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2018 3:50 pm
by Raskolnikov
You think sky's read given on my entrance is genuine?
otherwise I can maybe see flub but gustavo looks like red herring/VI imo (as opposed to superflailing)
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2018 3:53 pm
by Flubbernugget
Read up to page 11.
All this "liar"talk gives me a feeling that Gustavo is being a pedant wrt inferno. I will have to confirm via iso eventually
The case on me is weak sauce. Something about coasting being scummy but not willing to call scum over it. As a rule of thumb, voting someone over one tell is a bad idea
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2018 4:49 pm
by dramonic
?
Not sure what that means, even after google define.
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2018 5:11 pm
by Raskolnikov
Tight lipped
Aside from on inferno I don't know much of what you're thinking this game (okay it's early)
and there I kinda want to know more of what your read is now after his exchange (I have to try to guess at your meaning in
222, I mean the implication is you don't like it)
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2018 5:23 pm
by davesaz
Disagree heartily. I'd agree with lynching someone over one tell can be a bad idea, but even that is situational. Certain contexts it's absolutely the right thing to do.
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2018 5:27 pm
by Pine
With 17 votes in play, it's 9 to lynch!
Sometimes, in a game of Risk, people make bold moves early, and try to seize enemy territory before it gets fully consolidated. Not so this time. Black decided to give up on Asia and dig into South America, but those gray idiots are still slugging it out in Asia, this time with green. Everyone else is fortifying their borders. A few quiet "back room" deals go down, and with a wink and a nod, Central America becomes a demilitarized zone as a resurgent black focuses on the blue Africans, and the red North Americans seal their borders after picking off the last stragglers of opposing armies. Meanwhile, Pine's yellow forces slowly creep up out of Australia to menace, but not engage, the combatants in Asia from a position of strength.
Elbirn -
MagnaofIllusion -
Ausuka -
brassherald - davesaz
the worst - HeWhoSwims
dramonic - HitAlt
HitAlt -
Skygazer - Raskolnikov
Inferno390 - dramonic
Chickadee -
xyzzy -
HeWhoSwims -
Flubbernugget - MagnaofIllusion, Ausuka, brassherald
Raskolnikov - the worst, xyzzy, Skygazer
davesaz -
Gustavo - Elbirn, Inferno390, Profii, Gustavo
Profii -
Nursing their beer (Not voting)
- Chickadee, Flubbernugget
Deadline in (expired on 2018-07-09 15:40:00)
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2018 5:28 pm
by Chickadee
I will catch up on this...at some point. Probably tomorrow.
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2018 6:05 pm
by profii
Ok so now we have Rask content... easily town
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2018 7:35 pm
by HeWhoSwims
In post 301, Gustavo wrote:I just read flubber’s 180. I don’t see how that’s worse than profli’s sayung rask is playing against his win condition by no lynching tbh.
Point me to the 180? Couldn't spot it... Then again it's early morning here
In post 304, Ausuka wrote:That makes sense to me though w/profii? nolynching d1 definitely doesn't help the town. Like, I agree Rask's actions weren't scummy but I feel profii's actions weren't either.
Exactly - this is the point profii (and I) are making
In post 322, Gustavo wrote:Y’all can go ahead and lynch me. My earlier statement about the people in this game stands.
VOTE: gustavo
Self votes are bad
![:]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png "Cheerful Smile")
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2018 7:38 pm
by HeWhoSwims
In post 328, Raskolnikov wrote:Dramonic posting strikes me as very cagey here
Has to go into more why the progression by inferno is fake given I don't think anyone else sees ingame agrees (gustavo having had problem with inferno on something entirely different)
I can agree with this. Don't see a whole lot of read forming in there upon a re read.
I still don't scumread Inferno for the entire ordeal
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2018 7:43 pm
by HitAlt
I'd say..likely yes.
Or at least I've read a game with you in it.
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2018 7:52 pm
by HitAlt
I checked Gus, and they seem to often get into arguments.
What pinged me though, was the one who outright called them toxic etc.
It felt like intentional provocation with the aim of getting people to dislike them..
Not sure why but that is how I feel.
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2018 12:47 am
by Gustavo
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2018 1:14 am
by the worst
In post 232, Elbirn wrote:@Both of you, What made that post notable or good when it was nothing? Like it's really self serving for Rasko to like it so lul
Fwiw this was about when I decided Inferno was an early townread. I don't really think you're interested in why I found the post noteworthy though? Like let me know if you're after something here.
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2018 1:16 am
by the worst
In post 166, the worst wrote: In post 156, profii wrote:then a wagon formed on Rask - I think we will find opportunistic scum in there, but I'm just popping by on my lunch break so I'll check the VC later.
hmm do you think Rask is town or being bussed?
Profii where was your mind at in 156 and why did you neglect to answer this?
