I'm not talking about your vote. You said "flicker seems a bit defensive but nothing concrete yet", then your next post you were like, odds are the mafia team doesn't include Flicker. That doesn't make sense if you actually suspected Flicker.
I'm not talking about your vote. You said "flicker seems a bit defensive but nothing concrete yet", then your next post you were like, odds are the mafia team doesn't include Flicker. That doesn't make sense if you actually suspected Flicker.
guess its kinda inconsistent with my logic but i was still going for the idea that maybe the reason why i wasnt getting any solid scumreads was because scum weren't talking
The votes moved from FF to Flicker and who FF and Flicker are voting for.
FF might have gotten caught early and then talked his way out of things. That said, I have known him to be lynchbait, but a really good player, so I have a Null read on that dynamic of the game, however, because both Flicker and FF are voting the same person who seems to have produced a wagon out of nowhere seems pretty suspect to me.
Also, Nacy's post on this page seem to have Town tone and I know Nancy to be a pretty good Town player and they are voting for Flicker. I need to look into Stan1ey's progression and vote on Flicker more, but that is where I am at atm.
I'm not talking about your vote. You said "flicker seems a bit defensive but nothing concrete yet", then your next post you were like, odds are the mafia team doesn't include Flicker. That doesn't make sense if you actually suspected Flicker.
guess its kinda inconsistent with my logic but i was still going for the idea that maybe the reason why i wasnt getting any solid scumreads was because scum weren't talking
Ok.
Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2018 6:41 pm
by nancy
In post 337, Quick wrote:The votes moved from FF to Flicker and who FF and Flicker are voting for.
FF might have gotten caught early and then talked his way out of things. That said, I have known him to be lynchbait, but a really good player, so I have a Null read on that dynamic of the game, however, because both Flicker and FF are voting the same person who seems to have produced a wagon out of nowhere seems pretty suspect to me.
Also, Nacy's post on this page seem to have Town tone and I know Nancy to be a pretty good Town player and they are voting for Flicker. I need to look into Stan1ey's progression and vote on Flicker more, but that is where I am at atm.
What are Tone Reads lmao
Pls explain the FF talking his way out of things thing, thank
Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2018 6:43 pm
by nancy
In post 337, Quick wrote:That said, I have known him to be lynchbait, but a really good player, so I have a Null read on that dynamic of the game, however, because both Flicker and FF are voting the same person who seems to have produced a wagon out of nowhere seems pretty suspect to me.
In post 337, Quick wrote:The votes moved from FF to Flicker and who FF and Flicker are voting for.
FF might have gotten caught early and then talked his way out of things. That said, I have known him to be lynchbait, but a really good player, so I have a Null read on that dynamic of the game, however, because both Flicker and FF are voting the same person who seems to have produced a wagon out of nowhere seems pretty suspect to me.
Also, Nacy's post on this page seem to have Town tone and I know Nancy to be a pretty good Town player and they are voting for Flicker. I need to look into Stan1ey's progression and vote on Flicker more, but that is where I am at atm.
What are Tone Reads lmao
Pls explain the FF talking his way out of things thing, thank
Stuff like saying lmao for no Scum motive would be a Town tone read.
I haven't read the thread, just going based on the VCs alone at this point.
In post 337, Quick wrote:That said, I have known him to be lynchbait, but a really good player, so I have a Null read on that dynamic of the game, however, because both Flicker and FF are voting the same person who seems to have produced a wagon out of nowhere seems pretty suspect to me.
How is this a sentence lmao
What do you mean? How is it NOT a sentence?
Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2018 6:46 pm
by Quick
Basically I think there's a good chance of Scum in FF and Flicker, don't know why that is difficult to understand.
Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2018 6:46 pm
by OkaPoka
also started to scumread flicker more cuz peer pressure and my solid town were scumreading him
Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2018 6:46 pm
by OkaPoka
guess im kinda a sheep
Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2018 6:47 pm
by Formerfish
In post 337, Quick wrote:The votes moved from FF to Flicker and who FF and Flicker are voting for.
Not quite, VC1.02 has Oka, Ice and Trinity on me, but those are all RVS votes. VC1.03 still the same 3. 1.04 no change. 1.05 Oka and Ice change their vote and only trinity is left on.
Flicker wasnt even on the board til 1.04 when nancy and stan voted her. She finally voted in 1.05 for Oka, and I could see a possibility for a bus vote from her on her partner here. Especially if she thought it could put some distance between the two of them.
FF might have gotten caught early and then talked his way out of things.
Nothing to get caught from when the votes are all hellos of sorts. I guess I am a likeable guy and have played a lot of newbie games recently so I am a player that they are going to remember and poke during rvs.
That said, I have known him to be lynchbait
O rly? have we played together? Where have you seen me as lynchbait?
, but a really good player
totally correct here
, so I have a Null read on that dynamic of the game, however, because both Flicker and FF are voting the same person who seems to have produced a wagon out of nowhere seems pretty suspect to me.
Nah dont sweat it. Heres what I see. Either my read on Flicker is wrong, and she is pushing a legit scum read in Oka, which I also happen to share, or she is scum with him and she is trying to distance herself with a fake blow up between the two and then a bus vote. Like I said, I came to a scum read on Oka dependent on my own variables. If flicker is helping achieve the goals I want to, it doesnt matter what her alignment is yet.
In post 337, Quick wrote:The votes moved from FF to Flicker and who FF and Flicker are voting for.
FF might have gotten caught early and then talked his way out of things. That said, I have known him to be lynchbait, but a really good player, so I have a Null read on that dynamic of the game, however, because both Flicker and FF are voting the same person who seems to have produced a wagon out of nowhere seems pretty suspect to me.
Also, Nacy's post on this page seem to have Town tone and I know Nancy to be a pretty good Town player and they are voting for Flicker. I need to look into Stan1ey's progression and vote on Flicker more, but that is where I am at atm.
What are Tone Reads lmao
Pls explain the FF talking his way out of things thing, thank
Stuff like saying lmao for no Scum motive would be a Town tone read.
I haven't read the thread, just going based on the VCs alone at this point.
Oh, that wasn't a question, lmao
Also I say lmao a lot, I'm pretty sure it has nothing to do with my alignment because I say lmao when I'm scum too, and I am actually laughing IRL it's not just a word, lmao
In post 337, Quick wrote:That said, I have known him to be lynchbait, but a really good player, so I have a Null read on that dynamic of the game, however, because both Flicker and FF are voting the same person who seems to have produced a wagon out of nowhere seems pretty suspect to me.
How is this a sentence lmao
What do you mean? How is it NOT a sentence?
You said a thing is null, then said the same thing is suspect? I can't follow your words at all. What or who is suspect? It's like you were having one thought then broke off in the middle and finished a separate thought or something lmao
Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2018 6:50 pm
by nancy
In post 344, Quick wrote:Basically I think there's a good chance of Scum in FF and Flicker, don't know why that is difficult to understand.