Page 14 of 111
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 12:45 am
by shortaru
Thor is using content from an ongoing game to meta Gamma, and Gamma is baiting Thor into sharing details about that content which would get Thor in trouble with the site mods if he were to do so.
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 1:03 am
by Carcalilly
oh
can you use another game..??
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 1:09 am
by shortaru
... you've been in a lot more games than I have.
Surely you know what's allowed to be discussed & what isn't.
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 1:17 am
by ThoseInCharge
Ok so I wanted Ari to post for a while, but then I realised that his V/LA overlaps with my V/LA :/
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 1:34 am
by ThoseInCharge
This only makes you scummier, because it means you have done less sorting on page 5, because posts 103 and 117 don't do much for you in your reads, but also 106, which I saw as either questioning short or convincing him of scum!Gamma, which is not in line with your stances on both of them.
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 1:40 am
by ThoseInCharge
I am going to sheep RC's townread on Carca, because I have modded one of the games RC is basing the meta off.
Speaking of RC, why are you so convinced I'm scum? I think you should know better about me.
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 1:44 am
by ThoseInCharge
In post 246, BBmolla wrote: In post 229, BBmolla wrote:RC I see where you’re coming from but I’m not sure it’s scummy, just weird.
This was supposed to be at TiC I mixed up players
BnL always reads like a robot to me
I don’t even remember your posts before last page RC one sec
Btw why are you saying this when you dont have any games with me?
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 1:51 am
by ThoseInCharge
Will analyse the rest tomorrow
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 2:09 am
by Gamma Emerald
In post 325, shortaru wrote:
Thor is using content from an ongoing game to meta Gamma, and Gamma is baiting Thor into sharing details about that content which would get Thor in trouble with the site mods if he were to do so.
Lolno
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 3:52 am
by Flubbernugget
In post 325, shortaru wrote:
Thor is using content from an ongoing game to meta Gamma, and Gamma is baiting Thor into sharing details about that content which would get Thor in trouble with the site mods if he were to do so.
Yeah, I have to trace who egged who on to start that mess, but even then I dont really think Gamma makes cunning plays akin to Thor's accusation
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 3:53 am
by Flubbernugget
Btw shortaru do you have scum reads other than thor?
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 3:58 am
by Flubbernugget
In post 255, Thor665 wrote:So my meta is correct but only if I'm up to date on you and because you can't recall any games we've played recently (and apparently have decided I never read other games) then you're going to question my call on this correct meta and even back Sortaru on his really clumsy and (as far as I can tell) misreading what I'm saying attack on the meta as though he had a valid point.
Woah
Uhhh
There's a lot of really subtle use of "correct meta" here that tries to hand wave when or when not that meta was of good use
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 3:59 am
by Flubbernugget
I suggest people reread that part of 255, also reading what it is a direct response to
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:03 am
by Flubbernugget
In post 277, Thor665 wrote:You and I both know even if stuff is {redacted} I'm not only able to pull from a distant past with you, and maybe if I'm not pulling from a distant past I might have done more recent research.
Your issue here is blatant hogwash.
This is the first reference to doing the naughty thing that I caught onto. Maybe there was something more subtle or I skimmed too carelessly?
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:07 am
by Flubbernugget
Uh yeah thor, that's not baiting you. It's doubting your meta on gamma. Which if you cant talk about, I am going to doubt too. If you're this confident in gamma being scum you should be able to sell a case with tells outside of this meta conversation.
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:08 am
by Flubbernugget
There was other stuff I wanted to look at but now I forget what it was
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:41 am
by shortaru
I'm not scumreading Thor.
Catch up before you question me, please.
![:]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png "Cheerful Smile")
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:00 am
by Flubbernugget
Uh, thanks I guess
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:06 am
by shortaru
Oh oops, forgot the other part of your question. Sorry!
Gamma. Figured my vote being there told that story.
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:14 am
by Flubbernugget
In post 313, Gamma Emerald wrote:Hm
Recalled something wrong, I thought among his list of meta theories was one about not interacting with scumreads being stupid
What is this in reference to?
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:15 am
by Flubbernugget
Specifically, what post?
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:16 am
by Flubbernugget
In post 325, shortaru wrote:
Thor is using content from an ongoing game to meta Gamma, and Gamma is baiting Thor into sharing details about that content which would get Thor in trouble with the site mods if he were to do so.
Why is the bating more wrong then trying to use ongoing meta in the first place?
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:23 am
by shortaru
In post 346, Flubbernugget wrote: In post 325, shortaru wrote:
Thor is using content from an ongoing game to meta Gamma, and Gamma is baiting Thor into sharing details about that content which would get Thor in trouble with the site mods if he were to do so.
Why is the bating more wrong then trying to use ongoing meta in the first place?
Using the ongoing is a site rules issue.
Baiting to undermine the ongoing meta/trigger moderation action is both a site rules issue and alignment indicative.
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:54 am
by Flubbernugget
I'd argue that pushing a case you cant talk about is just as AI as calling that out, if not more AI
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 6:07 am
by Performer
Hi all,
friendly reminder to please not refer to ongoing games . Doesn't look like anyone was trying to do that but just wanted to be clear.
Thanks .
-Performer