Mafiascum.net

Still want NotNova

In post 323, Persivul wrote:

In post 149, Lamees wrote:We're lynching rb. I've seen this happen too much and lost games as town because of it. Not letting it go. My vote is on rb for the entire game until one of us gets lynched.

In post 322, Lamees wrote:It's 1 to vote lamees
2 to vote lamees

I want an example where town has ever tunnel like this and what would the reason be. I have been in this situation before and was scum doing it.

So you're scum claiming.

That's a bold strategy, Cotton.

I'm saying after seeing rbs push on me I now know rb is scum.

I have been tunneled like this and let it go. Town ended up losing. This time no.

I know what you're saying. Point is that you did the same, so by your own criteria you're scum.

If you know what I'm saying then you're just trolling. Because it's not a scum claim nor am I scum by my own criteria. I did not start random tunneling anyone. And then still admit it's "not serious"

In post 325, DVa wrote:Still want NotNova

Why?

In post 330, Leodanny wrote:

In post 325, DVa wrote:Still want NotNova

Why?

Maybe because they're on VLA...

It's Thursday

Can do this too though

VOTE: Persivul

Holy OMGUS Batman!

Wow so lamees first and dva next

mafia so easy imo

I rolled angel though

In post 331, Persivul wrote:Maybe because they're on VLA...

This is white knighting a slot that should by all rights be null to you and shading me for pushing a null slot that is coming back from V/LA is anti-town. Unless you are explicitly townreading NN that was a 'undead-friendly' post.

That being said I reread your iso so I'm going back here

VOTE: NotNova

Could also do Mala today

In post 317, Auro wrote:Agreements or not aside, my paraphrasing of your case; is it correct?

If you take out the 'I don't know what the motive is' part and replace it with 'I see a motive to do this as scum, but not one to do it as town' then yes.

In post 318, Persivul wrote:What I don't get is why Thor keeps on about it.

What experience do you have with me that would expect me to let something go if I thought it was scum indicative?

In post 336, Lamees wrote:I rolled angel though

pls no one counterclaim this fake claim imo

wow real power roles stay quiet imo

i hope thor isn't scum because i don't wanna have to start reading his posts

wow can we cop check thor and auro just because i started reading their interactions and now i have depression imo

In post 342, rb wrote:wow can we cop check thor and auro just because i started reading their interactions and now i have depression imo

Good

I'm out hope replacement is good

Bye then

In post 342, rb wrote:wow can we cop check thor and auro just because i started reading their interactions and now i have depression imo

You actually read that?

i tried

too hard tbh

cop checks on both imo

In post 347, rb wrote:i tried

too hard tbh

cop checks on both imo

How do you know a cop exists? Feels a bit like TMI.
If you're scum who knows cop exists, these posts make me think you have a framer as well.
If you didn't bother reading our exchange properly, why do you not think it could be TvT?

In post 314, Auro wrote:And your attack on me is that you can't see what town motivation my efforting would have, but see scum motivation; but I would try to cover my non-efforting up as scum instead of admitting that I am not efforting. Correct? Gosh.

Cool, so that's your attack. I think it's pretty convoluted and plays around with definitions and semantics.
Multiple people echoed what Persivul said even out of this game, about me arguing out of stubbornness. I'm still not able to judge the interaction properly. From games I've read, Thor makes these kind of pushes as town too.
If people actually *buy* what he said, I'll go into this further.