Mafiascum.net

In post 324, Alisae wrote:

Intent to Hammer

Please no until Gamma claims

Claim VT
Don’t lynch Ari after this though

Why not?

In post 289, Gamma Emerald wrote:I was suspecting your slot but you’ve definitely been an improvement
I don’t like how TTTT seems to be hardcore double talking the me vs Alisae situation

This is the only place you've stated a townread(?) on Ari so you're definitely going to have to expand on this.

VOTE: Ari

I'll be back before EOD to hammer
but I'd like Pers to take a stand
like I asked before

In post 329, TTTT wrote:VOTE: Ari

I'll be back before EOD to hammer

Huh...scum trying to get off a mislynch maybe, assuming it will go through anyway due to looming deadline?

but I'd like Pers to take a stand
like I asked before

I took a stand in 236: Jumble/Ari, then Gamma. Ari has done nothing to change that.

Why do you pretend that I haven't taken a stand.

you haven't voted

In post 326, Gamma Emerald wrote:Claim VT
Don’t lynch Ari after this though

Okay now Gamma dies for sure.
VOTE: Gamma
This is probably a wolfclaim.
This read makes absolutely no sense and is just a wolf throwing wine at this point.
It’s to fuck with people.

Like Idunno I have a hard time seeing town write something like this it’s because I expect there to be more to it.

In post 331, TTTT wrote:you haven't voted

There was no need to, as there was already L-1 and intent on someone in my lynch pool.

At least that was the case before you flip-flopped your vote for no reason.

I'll be available until 4pm Eastern.

But if you insist on a vote before then...

VOTE: TTTT

Why did you change your vote?

In post 326, Gamma Emerald wrote:Claim VT
Don’t lynch Ari after this though

Pers thoughts on this

In post 334, Alisae wrote:

In post 326, Gamma Emerald wrote:Claim VT
Don’t lynch Ari after this though

Pers thoughts on this

Those are my top two scum reads. But, they're 1 and 2 on your wagon. That would be unusual for scum, so I'm doubtful they're both scum. If Gamma's lynched and flips red, I'll be less suspicious of Ari. If Gamma flips green, then Ari isn't looking good.

I was really hoping Ari would come in with some more content. He basically posted some banter, put a scum read on you which I disagree with, and disappeared. He was on site for some time last night but didn't post in this game.

In post 332, Alisae wrote:

In post 326, Gamma Emerald wrote:Claim VT
Don’t lynch Ari after this though

Okay now Gamma dies for sure.
VOTE: Gamma
This is probably a wolfclaim.
This read makes absolutely no sense and is just a wolf throwing wine at this point.
It’s

meant

to fuck with people.

Like Idunno I have a hard time seeing town write something like this it’s because I expect there to be more to it.

Agreed
I don't see town posting this and leaving

In post 335, Persivul wrote:That would be unusual for scum,

Given the context I actually don't think so.
They're both pushing the quickhammer, so I feel like from a wolf's PoV, that's a lynch that can take off pretty well. The opportunity and potential for a mislynch is definitely there.

But I think if Gamma is indeed scum I think it leads to Ari being town, because looking at the Gamma/Ari interactions they are so bad I think Gamma is intentionally setting Ari up.

Btw I won't be at deadline and I'll probably be here for 1-2 hours at max

Anything else asides from that last post?
Also how would that explain Ari's reads, who seem like they're kinda trying to work with Gamma.

In post 339, singletonking wrote:Btw I won't be at deadline and I'll probably be here for 1-2 hours at max

That's fine I wouldn't mind using those 1 or 2 hours to talk.

What do you think about TTTT's vote change with less than a day to deadline?

In post 340, Alisae wrote:Anything else asides from that last post?
Also how would that explain Ari's reads, who seem like they're kinda trying to work with Gamma.

Eh
I dislike their mutual townreads, but that was a red flag to me as trying to intentionally form bad associatives

In post 342, Persivul wrote:What do you think about TTTT's vote change with less than a day to deadline?

In post 329, TTTT wrote:VOTE: Ari

I'll be back before EOD to hammer

but I'd like Pers to take a stand
like I asked before

Single I'm down to talk but I want you to drive the conversation since I feel like most if not all of my cards are pratically flat out on the table so I'm not exactly sure where to start.
Aside from my GL read and strongly believing in the fact I feel like I solved the game now, I feel like practically everything I feel like I've had to say I've practically said.

pedit: I honestly don't care dude.
He probs just wants more information out of the day.
Like I get it he's weird but like
Idunno I just don't feel like its scummy weird

But TTTT's someone going into my lynch list if Gamma flips town
His vote on Gamma was the worst

In post 345, Alisae wrote:Single I'm down to talk but I want you to drive the conversation since I feel like most if not all of my cards are pratically flat out on the table so I'm not exactly sure where to start.
Aside from my GL read and strongly believing in the fact I feel like I solved the game now, I feel like practically everything I feel like I've had to say I've practically said.

pedit: I honestly don't care dude.
He probs just wants more information out of the day.
Like I get it he's weird but like
Idunno I just don't feel like its scummy weird

Idk my reads line up with yours

Except I still have a bit of paranoia of you, while you have been towny I feel you may be able to do this as scum given my perceived experience of you, and there's lingering thoughts of that quickhammer

In post 343, singletonking wrote:

In post 340, Alisae wrote:Anything else asides from that last post?
Also how would that explain Ari's reads, who seem like they're kinda trying to work with Gamma.

Eh
I dislike their mutual townreads, but that was a red flag to me as trying to intentionally form bad associatives

Okay but from Gamma's PoV, he thinks he is going to die for sure.
So he's either going to make you think that to either protect his buddy or setup bad associatives.
It's wine, so I'm ignoring it. But I'm wondering why you think he's moreso just trying to setup bad associatives over using something like that to protect his buddy.

In post 347, singletonking wrote:scum given my perceived experience of you

Putting alignment aside, what are those?