Mafiascum.net

In post 241, Non lmh wrote:I'm still a newb, so I'm milking the status for all it's worth. 5 complete games, that's the goal rn, leave me be.

In post 327, Nicholai wrote:@Gjt: are you leaning town on anyone? also, being cryptic with reads is not a great look for you, and won't help us much if you're town

In post 294, SausasaurusRex wrote:I think Nicholai is town now, so UNVOTE:
Pisskop’s 261 doesn’t contribute to the discussion in any way, as does Invisibility’s 281.
However, I’m really not liking what Winpy’s saying, so VOTE: Wimpy.

In post 286, Nicholai wrote:can you link the game where your signature quote is from invis?

In post 306, Nicholai wrote:

In post 284, Invisibility wrote:VOTE: bob

so why this invis? bob's a pretty cool guy you know

In post 217, bob3141 wrote:

In post 206, Wimpy wrote:Mislynch day 1 is actually preferable

I actualy dont get why if your town, that you woudl think this. As scum lynchs are always preferable to mislynches. Especially day one scum lynches as the scum are put on the back foot very early. If as town we lynch one of their number

In post 307, SausasaurusRex wrote:

In post 304, Nicholai wrote:

In post 294, SausasaurusRex wrote:I think Nicholai is town now, so UNVOTE:
Pisskop’s 261 doesn’t contribute to the discussion in any way, as does Invisibility’s 281.
However, I’m really not liking what Winpy’s saying, so VOTE: Wimpy.

are you reading "idk" and "lol" as scummy? i've had quite a few filler posts too.

No, I don't tink it was scummy. I was just pointing out they didn't contribute. I pointed out those specifically because Invisibility asked a question, and was responded to with a useless reply.

In post 303, Wimpy wrote:

In post 294, SausasaurusRex wrote:I think Nicholai is town now

Also please explain the weird 180

I voted Nicholai for treating members unfairly and, as a result of that, illogically. However, this is a very minor infraction, and I have since seen nothing that indicates he could be scum. I did make a slight mistype though - I meant to say "town - leaning", as I treat all players who I don't think are scum, due to the statistical likelihood of them being town.

In post 302, Wimpy wrote:What about what I’m saying don’t you like and why does that make me scum? Don’t be vague

In post 297, Kanna wrote:

In post 294, SausasaurusRex wrote:I think Nicholai is town now, so UNVOTE:
Pisskop’s 261 doesn’t contribute to the discussion in any way, as does Invisibility’s 281.
However, I’m really not liking what Winpy’s saying, so VOTE: Wimpy.

I mean, those aren’t their only posts that don’t contribute to discussion, but why is what Wimpy said worse + what don’t you like that Wimpy has said?

Sorry, I'd thought that this was more clear than it was. In 206, Wimpy says "Mislynch day 1 is actually preferable". This stood out as scummy to me over all other posts, which is why I am currently voting him. If someone does something I find more scummy, my vote will change accordingly. This argument was used by Salamence, and was called misrepresentation. I don't see how this is misrepresentation, as it is a direct quote, and so cannot be misrepresented.
It appears what he was saying was intended to say that it is a less optimal play, but I'm not seeing the logic in that. If someone explained it to me and I feel the logic is satisfactory, I will change my vote, but until then, my vote remains.

In post 339, Invisibility wrote:feels like scum calling out things that aren’t scummy
though this might just be bad town, bob’s account is only a few months old eyes

In post 346, Invisibility wrote:anyway when can we bring emojis to ms

In post 347, Nicholai wrote:

In post 346, Invisibility wrote:anyway when can we bring emojis to ms

what do you mean, there's a decent collection already :?: