Mafiascum.net

Natsu, Arthur's been criticising people for "bad play" a lot this game, whereas he did none of that in his other game. CTR-F "bad" in his ISO there and then here to see for yourself. It's also just how he's less uncertain and tentative. Though, there are other reasons he could be switching up his playstlye which I won't mention right now. Really, I just need him to come back and post more.

I'm not tunnelling btw, tunnelling is when you hone in on one person being scum and leave no alternatives and don't think about anyone else. I'm scumreading him.

In what way did my bickering with Pikachu seem manufactured, Natsu?

Meta with regards to newbies has to be taken with a huge grain of salt; they are in the process of developing their style and can be completely different from one game to the next.

I almost made the mistake of SR’ing dsjstr on these grounds in our previous game together, because his play-style was unrecognizable from his first game, but his alignment turned out to be the same.

In post 327, Luca Blight wrote:In what way did my bickering with Pikachu seem manufactured, Natsu?

You start it in a really plain way (your RVS vote was too serious). Most of the conversation is filler and it seems to absolve you of two criticisms that people have had: Lurking and not answering the query.

So your theory is that Scum!Pikachu accuses scum!Luca of x, y and z, and then scum!Luca responds by doing x, y and z, thus removing the reason for being scumread?

Is that correct?

can everyone die except me kthx

I notice you both TR Koba for being irritated with Pikachu’s gimmick. Could you explain why this is Town-indicative?

In post 332, Luca Blight wrote:

@Hectic/72

I notice you both TR Koba for being irritated with Pikachu’s gimmick. Could you explain why this is Town-indicative?

It was at a point where the Detective was only talking in pikas. Town's more likely to be annoyed because it makes it much harder to read him.

I mean, obviously the annoyance can be faked, but scum's probably more fine to let that happen and not try and shut it down.

In post 331, ROUND ONE wrote:can everyone die except me kthx

Give us some arguments for scum Luca, Hectic, Pikachu, and sure.

Easy game.

R1 can you expand on why you see hectic scum?

In post 338, Detective Pikachu wrote:R1 can you expand on why you see hectic scum?

no

In post 298, ROUND ONE wrote:catchup done
ama

In post 339, ROUND ONE wrote:

In post 338, Detective Pikachu wrote:R1 can you expand on why you see hectic scum?

no

What sort of ama is this?

R1:

In post 298, ROUND ONE wrote:catchup done
ama

Also R1:

In post 339, ROUND ONE wrote:

In post 338, Detective Pikachu wrote:R1 can you expand on why you see hectic scum?

no

Wow

DAT NINJA THOOOOO

i dont remember pog

In post 344, ROUND ONE wrote:i dont remember pog

What about Arthur for town?

Luca: Null - He was interactive in his scum game and distant in his town game, he is being a different kind of interactive this game... but he knows I know that(I know what you're trying to do)

Pikachu: Null - I don't see scum targeting each other like that

72o: Town - Was paranoid in his town game but I'd say it is more likely that he just feels more confident that his first game(I know I did)

Hectic/Natsu: Scum - Early on I saw them as a pair. I didn't see real attempts at trying to lynch each other, they then tried to distance themselves.

R1: Town - good boy

Arthur: Town - Just playing the odds; he seemed like he really wanted to be able to solve the game but we were too silly for him

Koba: Null - Sure

In post 347, dsjstr wrote:Hectic/Natsu: Scum - Early on I saw them as a pair. I didn't see real attempts at trying to lynch each other, they then tried to distance themselves.

Why would I try to lynch someone I townlean? Can you point to examples of what you didn't like?

pagebottom