https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
Ironically, if you'd read the posts you were criticizing, you wouldn't make this post.In post 322, Alduskkel wrote:isn't it weird that miss lynch is attacking auro way more than the person she's voting for
Where do you expect this information to lead you?In post 325, Alduskkel wrote:Well, what's your read on Auro?
In the same way, telling you what I'm doing defeats the purpose of doing what I'm doing.In post 329, Alduskkel wrote:Telling you what response what result in what read defeats the purpose of asking the question.
You repeatedly bringing up the things that I'm doing is scummy. Call it whatever you'd like.In post 333, Auro wrote:So I'm scummy because I couldn't find said reasoning and asked you to please quote it because I seem to have missed it?
I'm not relentlessly asking "why", I'm asking "what"; since you claimed there were solid reasons/cases blah blah.
You and me being on the same page about a certain player only matters if I'm trying to get you on the same page as me about that player or if I'm trying to get you to read me a specific way. Given that I've already made it clear that I don't care how you read me or whether or not you're on the same page as me about that specific player at this point in time, I don't understand why you expect any sort of response here.I expected it to lead to you quoting said cases and me saying "Oh yeah, okay". Right now with my line of questioning I'm expecting you to either back down on your push of me (and by this I mean the specific attacks you made on me), or attempt to justify it more.
In post 328, Miss Lane wrote:Just give me one. Please. I want one reason for one of your posts. One reason that the post is actually productive, and not just some reactionary question because you play the game on auto-pilot. Just give me one snippet that displays you've put even the slightest amount of thought into the questions you ask.
Can you tone down the hostility? It's fine if you think I'm scum, but please don't act like I'm brainless.In post 330, Miss Lane wrote:I'm starved for faith here, give me some reason to believe you're worth my time.
I would have thought that you would be able to deduce the fact that I don't care about your stance on me or your stance on the player in question considering I haven't shared this information. If I wanted you on the same page as me, I'd ask you to be on the same page as me. Or I would respond amiably when you asked me for information that would help you get on the same page as me.In post 333, Auro wrote:I expected it to lead to you quoting said cases and me saying "Oh yeah, okay". Right now with my line of questioning I'm expecting you to either back down on your push of me (and by this I mean the specific attacks you made on me), or attempt to justify it more.
Ok. Stop asking stupid questions that have already been answered.In post 336, Alduskkel wrote:In post 328, Miss Lane wrote:Just give me one. Please. I want one reason for one of your posts. One reason that the post is actually productive, and not just some reactionary question because you play the game on auto-pilot. Just give me one snippet that displays you've put even the slightest amount of thought into the questions you ask.Can you tone down the hostility? It's fine if you think I'm scum, but please don't act like I'm brainless.In post 330, Miss Lane wrote:I'm starved for faith here, give me some reason to believe you're worth my time.
How I read your posting:In post 319, Miss Lane wrote:I would like to see a defense of any purpose you can assign to your line of questioning other than the conclusion I have reached, Auro. Unless your argument is that it is all pointless, and you ask for the sake of asking. Then I'd just like you to acknowledge that and we'll both be on our ways.
Do you believe that I'm lying about myself?In post 311, popsofctown wrote:It's kind of about the way you tied you account gimmick to the fact you were beginning a mafia gameIn post 304, Yshtola Rhul wrote:I think it's polite to introduce yourself to a group of people that don't know you when you first meet them. Is this wrong?In post 301, popsofctown wrote:be more cautious and slow on the trigger and exploit meta to get generally accurate reads because all of you are almost as bad as smurfs ALL OF YOUIn post 298, Yshtola Rhul wrote:What is your idea of how an alt would approach this game?In post 296, popsofctown wrote:Hm I think I would not townread yshtola if I really thought she was a main
If hecticgenie grants my wish that she is a main against literally all indications and reason she would not be townread she would be HYPERTOWNREAD HER
(but more seriously my townread of her is based on my idea of how an alt would approach this game)
but also your weird nai initial post becomes a seasoned cynicism worthy of its own threadvisit rather than a genuine visit to the thread and attempt to contribute with a joke and a read drafted and the read backspaced out because it might be scummy (the word joke used lightly here it was more like a poetry/irony thing? idk)
It my hinge somewhat on my apprehension or misapprehension of yshtola though.
Because I haven't played her source FF game, I only have seen her card in Puzzles and Dragons, and it has no attack stats but lots of abilities which makes me think it's probably scholarly.
But like if that's inaccurate it could change things the Liliana card in PAD has a low healing stat and that's definitely wrong they just usually get it right
Why must my every mafia game include the totality of my life experiences
I am not aware of any post where you have claimed whether to be a main or an alt.In post 342, Yshtola Rhul wrote:Do you believe that I'm lying about myself?In post 311, popsofctown wrote:It's kind of about the way you tied you account gimmick to the fact you were beginning a mafia gameIn post 304, Yshtola Rhul wrote:I think it's polite to introduce yourself to a group of people that don't know you when you first meet them. Is this wrong?In post 301, popsofctown wrote:be more cautious and slow on the trigger and exploit meta to get generally accurate reads because all of you are almost as bad as smurfs ALL OF YOUIn post 298, Yshtola Rhul wrote:What is your idea of how an alt would approach this game?In post 296, popsofctown wrote:Hm I think I would not townread yshtola if I really thought she was a main
If hecticgenie grants my wish that she is a main against literally all indications and reason she would not be townread she would be HYPERTOWNREAD HER
(but more seriously my townread of her is based on my idea of how an alt would approach this game)
but also your weird nai initial post becomes a seasoned cynicism worthy of its own threadvisit rather than a genuine visit to the thread and attempt to contribute with a joke and a read drafted and the read backspaced out because it might be scummy (the word joke used lightly here it was more like a poetry/irony thing? idk)
It my hinge somewhat on my apprehension or misapprehension of yshtola though.
Because I haven't played her source FF game, I only have seen her card in Puzzles and Dragons, and it has no attack stats but lots of abilities which makes me think it's probably scholarly.
But like if that's inaccurate it could change things the Liliana card in PAD has a low healing stat and that's definitely wrong they just usually get it right
Why must my every mafia game include the totality of my life experiences
Because that has a worse reaction than responding to him does. At least in the past, ignoring players that questioned everything I did lead only to those players throwing a fits in the thread about how they're ignored, and the same (if not worse) negative response resulted to the point where anything I might have been doing before was ruined by the egos of players who'd rather ask a question when they don't know something than just watch and see if anything worthwhile happens. At least if I respond to him and repeat the same thing over and over again, he remains at least somewhat appeased and there is hope that eventually he'll shut up and allow himself to read the thread and ask the questions: "What purpose does me asking a question here serve? Could allowing this to play out result in a better game state for town through one way or another? What do I lose by allowing this person to do what they're doing? What do I gain by immediately interrupting everything and calling attention to my own lack of understanding?" At this point there is hope that the game might continue in a way that is more beneficial than the other method.In post 340, Alduskkel wrote:If you don't care about Auro's stance on you or me, then why keep replying to him?
If you read my posts that way, feel free to continue to do so, but this isn't a response, it's a defensive attempt to spit back at me because I called you out for playing without thinking.In post 341, Auro wrote:How I read your posting:In post 319, Miss Lane wrote:I would like to see a defense of any purpose you can assign to your line of questioning other than the conclusion I have reached, Auro. Unless your argument is that it is all pointless, and you ask for the sake of asking. Then I'd just like you to acknowledge that and we'll both be on our ways.
"Stop questioning me because I said I won't respond amicably to any of your questions! And stop scumreading me as well! Here are a ton of clues which tell you why I'm acting this way, but I also think you're scummy, and don't question me about that either. Anyone who questions me is stupid."
What are you hoping to gain from this? It's not likely to get you anything and will cause more damage to what you're trying to do than just leaving it alone.In post 318, Miss Lane wrote:Multiple times throughout the game I have pointed you in the direction you can look if you'd like to find the reasoning for my vote. Several times I've made it blatantly clear I have no intention of explaining it right now. I think you'd have a very hard time making an argument for my immediate lynch due to voting without an immediate explanation. I think your current train of questioning leads absolutely nowhere and you know it. If the statement before this one isn't true, please tell me where you do expect for it to lead. If you still are completely incapable of finding the long list of clues I've left you as to how you can find part of why I voted the way I voted, you will have to wait for the others. As it is, you have likely already ruined anything I trying to almost in its entirety. If, up until this point, I've been completely wrong about you and you fail to have the depth of understanding of mafia I had come to expect from you, I guess I will have learned the hard way.